The impact of renal function on clinical outcomes of patients with cancer-associated isolated distal deep vein thrombosis: Insights from the ONCO DVT study.
Cancer-associated thrombosis
Renal function
Venous thromboembolism
Journal
Thrombosis research
ISSN: 1879-2472
Titre abrégé: Thromb Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0326377
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Feb 2024
02 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
12
12
2023
revised:
15
01
2024
accepted:
25
01
2024
medline:
10
2
2024
pubmed:
10
2
2024
entrez:
9
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial ONCO DVT compared 3-month and 12-month edoxaban treatment regimens for isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and suggested potential benefits of prolonged edoxaban treatment in terms of thrombotic risk. However, the risk-benefit balance of prolonged edoxaban treatment in patients with renal function remains unclear. To compare the safety and efficacy of 3-month and 12-month edoxaban treatment regimens in patients with cancer-associated isolated distal DVT and different renal functions. This pre-specified subgroup analysis of the ONCO DVT study included 601 patients divided into subgroups according to renal function using a 50 mL/min creatinine clearance (Ccr) cutoff. The primary endpoint was symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE-related death at 12 months and the major secondary endpoint was major bleeding at 12 months. Among the 601 patients, 131 (21.8 %) comprised the renal dysfunction subgroup. The primary endpoint occurred in 6 (9.7 %) and 1 (1.4 %) patients in the 3-month and 12-month edoxaban groups in the renal dysfunction subgroup, respectively, and in 16 (6.6 %) and 2 (0.9 %) patients in the no renal dysfunction subgroup, respectively. The major secondary endpoint occurred in 9 (14.5 %) and 7 (10.1 %) patients in the 12-month and 3-month edoxaban groups in the renal dysfunction subgroup, and in 13 (5.3 %) and 21 (9.3 %) patients in the no renal dysfunction subgroup, respectively. A 12-month edoxaban regiment was superior to a 3-month treatment in terms of thrombotic risk irrespective of renal function. A higher bleeding risk was not identified in patients with renal dysfunction who received prolonged edoxaban treatment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial ONCO DVT compared 3-month and 12-month edoxaban treatment regimens for isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and suggested potential benefits of prolonged edoxaban treatment in terms of thrombotic risk. However, the risk-benefit balance of prolonged edoxaban treatment in patients with renal function remains unclear.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To compare the safety and efficacy of 3-month and 12-month edoxaban treatment regimens in patients with cancer-associated isolated distal DVT and different renal functions.
METHODS
METHODS
This pre-specified subgroup analysis of the ONCO DVT study included 601 patients divided into subgroups according to renal function using a 50 mL/min creatinine clearance (Ccr) cutoff. The primary endpoint was symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE-related death at 12 months and the major secondary endpoint was major bleeding at 12 months.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among the 601 patients, 131 (21.8 %) comprised the renal dysfunction subgroup. The primary endpoint occurred in 6 (9.7 %) and 1 (1.4 %) patients in the 3-month and 12-month edoxaban groups in the renal dysfunction subgroup, respectively, and in 16 (6.6 %) and 2 (0.9 %) patients in the no renal dysfunction subgroup, respectively. The major secondary endpoint occurred in 9 (14.5 %) and 7 (10.1 %) patients in the 12-month and 3-month edoxaban groups in the renal dysfunction subgroup, and in 13 (5.3 %) and 21 (9.3 %) patients in the no renal dysfunction subgroup, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A 12-month edoxaban regiment was superior to a 3-month treatment in terms of thrombotic risk irrespective of renal function. A higher bleeding risk was not identified in patients with renal dysfunction who received prolonged edoxaban treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38335565
pii: S0049-3848(24)00027-6
doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2024.01.021
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
107-115Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest Dr. Yamashita received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Daiichi Sankyo, and grant support from Bayer Healthcare and Daiichi Sankyo. Dr. Morimoto reports lecturer's fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Japan Lifeline, Kowa, Pfizer and Tsumura; manuscript fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer; advisory board for Novartis and Teijin. Dr. Nishimoto received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Daiichi Sankyo. Dr. Ogihara received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Daiichi Sankyo, and research funds from Bayer Healthcare and Daiichi Sankyo. Dr. Dohi received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Daiichi Sankyo, and research funds from Daiichi Sankyo. Dr. Ikeda N. received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Daiichi Sankyo. Dr. Tsubata received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kyowa Kirin, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical and Daiichi Sankyo, and grant support from Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca and Ono Pharmaceutical. Dr. Ikeda S. received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Daiichi Sankyo. Dr. Mo received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare. Dr. Tsujita received significant research grant from AMI Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Bristol-Myers K.K., EA Pharma Co., Ltd., MOCHIDA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., and scholarship fund from AMI Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Johnson & Johnson K.K., ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and honoraria from Amgen K.K., Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Kowa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Novartis Pharma K.K., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., and belongs to the endowed departments donated by Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Boston Scientific Japan K.K., Fides-one, Inc., GM Medical Co., Ltd., ITI Co., Ltd., Kaneka Medix Co., Ltd., NIPRO CORPORATION, TERUMO Co, Ltd., Abbott Medical Co., Ltd., Cardinal Health Japan, Fukuda Denshi Co., Ltd., Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd., Medical Appliance Co., Ltd., Medtoronic Japan Co., Ltd. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.