Machine Learning Prediction Model for Neutrophil Recovery after Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation.

cord blood transplantation machine learning method neutrophil recovery

Journal

Transplantation and cellular therapy
ISSN: 2666-6367
Titre abrégé: Transplant Cell Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101774629

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 25 11 2023
revised: 27 01 2024
accepted: 01 02 2024
medline: 10 2 2024
pubmed: 10 2 2024
entrez: 9 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Delayed neutrophil recovery is an important limitation to the administration of cord blood transplantation (CBT) and leaves the recipient vulnerable to life-threatening infection and increases the risk of other complications. A predictive model for neutrophil recovery after single-unit CBT was developed by using a machine learning method, which can handle large and complex datasets, allowing for the analysis of massive amounts of information to uncover patterns and make accurate predictions. Japanese registry data, the largest real-world dataset of CBT, was selected as the data source. Ninety-eight variables with observed values for more than 80% of the subjects known at the time of CBT were selected. Model building was performed with a competing risk regression model with lasso penalty. Prediction accuracy of the models was evaluated by calculating area under curve (AUC) using a test dataset. The primary outcome was neutrophil recovery at day 28 (D28), and D14 and D42 were analyzed as secondary outcomes. The final cord blood engraftment prediction (CBEP) models included 2,991 single-unit CBT recipients with acute leukemia. Median AUC of a D28-CBEP lasso regression model run 100 times was 0.74, and those of D14 and D42 were 0.88 and 0.68, respectively. The D28-CBEP model predictivity was higher than four different legacy models that were separately constructed. A highly predictive model for neutrophil recovery by 28 days after CBT was constructed using machine learning techniques. However, identification of significant risk factors was insufficient for outcome prediction for an individual patient, which is necessary for improving therapeutic outcomes. Notably, the prediction accuracy for days 14, 28, and 42 post-transplant decreased, and the model became more complex with more associated factors with increased time after transplantation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Delayed neutrophil recovery is an important limitation to the administration of cord blood transplantation (CBT) and leaves the recipient vulnerable to life-threatening infection and increases the risk of other complications.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
A predictive model for neutrophil recovery after single-unit CBT was developed by using a machine learning method, which can handle large and complex datasets, allowing for the analysis of massive amounts of information to uncover patterns and make accurate predictions.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
Japanese registry data, the largest real-world dataset of CBT, was selected as the data source. Ninety-eight variables with observed values for more than 80% of the subjects known at the time of CBT were selected. Model building was performed with a competing risk regression model with lasso penalty. Prediction accuracy of the models was evaluated by calculating area under curve (AUC) using a test dataset. The primary outcome was neutrophil recovery at day 28 (D28), and D14 and D42 were analyzed as secondary outcomes.
RESULT RESULTS
The final cord blood engraftment prediction (CBEP) models included 2,991 single-unit CBT recipients with acute leukemia. Median AUC of a D28-CBEP lasso regression model run 100 times was 0.74, and those of D14 and D42 were 0.88 and 0.68, respectively. The D28-CBEP model predictivity was higher than four different legacy models that were separately constructed.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
A highly predictive model for neutrophil recovery by 28 days after CBT was constructed using machine learning techniques. However, identification of significant risk factors was insufficient for outcome prediction for an individual patient, which is necessary for improving therapeutic outcomes. Notably, the prediction accuracy for days 14, 28, and 42 post-transplant decreased, and the model became more complex with more associated factors with increased time after transplantation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38336299
pii: S2666-6367(24)00182-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.02.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest Yku reports institutional grant funding from the Ministry of Health. RY reports institutional grant funding from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development and the Ministry of Health; payment for manuscript writing, presentation and educational event from Amelieff Corporation; and lecture fee from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. MT reports grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical; honoraria from Abbvie GK., Kyowa-Kirin, Daiichi-Sankyo, Sumitomo Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Pfizer, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, MSD and Asahi Kasei Pharma. SI reports collaborative research grants from Daiichi Sankyo RD Novare Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., and BrightPath Biotherapeutics Co., Ltd.; payment for manuscript writing, presentation and educational event from Amelieff Corporation; and lecture fee from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. YA reports institutional grant funding from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development and the Ministry of Health; consulting fees from JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. and Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.; lecture fees from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Novartis Pharma KK, AbbVie GK; and honorarium from Meiji Seika Pharma Co, Ltd. ST reports institutional grant funding from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development the Ministry of Health, and Daiichi Sankyo RD Novare Co., Ltd. The other authors declare no competing financial interests.

Auteurs

Yachiyo Kuwatsuka (Y)

Department of Advanced Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

Rika Kasajima (R)

Division of Health Medical Intelligence, Human Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Molecular Pathology and Genetics Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, Yokohama, Japan.

Rui Yamaguchi (R)

Division of Health Medical Intelligence, Human Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Division of Cancer Systems Biology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan; Division of Cancer Informatics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Naoyuki Uchida (N)

Department of Hematology, Federation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Associations Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Takaaki Konuma (T)

Department of Hematology/Oncology, The Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Masatsugu Tanaka (M)

Department of Hematology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.

Naoki Shingai (N)

Hematology Division, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Shigesaburo Miyakoshi (S)

Department of Hematology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.

Yasuji Kozai (Y)

Department of Hematology, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Fuchu, Japan.

Yasufumi Uehara (Y)

Department of Hematology, Kitakyushu City Hospital Organization, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu, Japan.

Tetsuya Eto (T)

Department of Hematology, Hamanomachi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.

Masako Toyosaki (M)

Department of Hematology/Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.

Tetsuya Nishida (T)

Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

Fumihiko Ishimaru (F)

Japanese Red Cross Kanto-Koshinetsu Block Blood Center, Atsugi, Japan.

Koji Kato (K)

Central Japan Cord Blood Bank, Seto, Japan.

Takahiro Fukuda (T)

Department of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital.

Seiya Imoto (S)

Division of Health Medical Intelligence, Human Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Yoshiko Atsuta (Y)

Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Nagakute, Japan; Department of Registry Science for Transplant and Cellular Therapy, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan. Electronic address: y-atsuta@jdchct.or.jp.

Satoshi Takahashi (S)

Department of Hematology/Oncology, The Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Classifications MeSH