Mood moderates the effects of prefrontal tDCS on executive functions: A meta-analysis testing the affective state-dependency hypothesis.

Affective state-dependency Meta-analysis Mood Non-invasive brain stimulation Prefrontal cortex Transcranial direct current stimulation

Journal

Journal of affective disorders
ISSN: 1573-2517
Titre abrégé: J Affect Disord
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7906073

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 05 09 2023
revised: 19 01 2024
accepted: 06 02 2024
medline: 11 2 2024
pubmed: 11 2 2024
entrez: 10 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In recent decades, numerous studies have investigated the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive functioning. However, results of these studies frequently display inconsistency and pose challenges regarding replicability. The present work aimed at testing the hypothesis of mood as potential moderator of prefrontal tDCS effects on executive functions (EF). This hypothesis refers to the relationship between mood and EF, as well as to the association of mood with the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) activity. We conducted a meta-analysis of 11 articles where the dlPFC was stimulated with anodal tDCS, EF were measured, and mood was assessed prior to the stimulation. We then conducted a meta-regression to examine whether mood moderated the tDCS effects on EF. While no significant effect of tDCS on EF emerged from the meta-analysis, the meta-regression indicated that mood plays a significant role as moderator, with greater tDCS effects on EF in individuals with higher depressive symptoms. The limited number of studies included, the heterogeneous samples considered, and the limited generalizability to other non-invasive brain stimulation techniques and affective states. Findings suggest that evaluating mood prior to stimulation could increase the sensitivity and specificity of tDCS application, and provide the first meta-analytic evidence in favor of the affective state-dependency hypothesis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In recent decades, numerous studies have investigated the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive functioning. However, results of these studies frequently display inconsistency and pose challenges regarding replicability. The present work aimed at testing the hypothesis of mood as potential moderator of prefrontal tDCS effects on executive functions (EF). This hypothesis refers to the relationship between mood and EF, as well as to the association of mood with the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) activity.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a meta-analysis of 11 articles where the dlPFC was stimulated with anodal tDCS, EF were measured, and mood was assessed prior to the stimulation. We then conducted a meta-regression to examine whether mood moderated the tDCS effects on EF.
RESULTS RESULTS
While no significant effect of tDCS on EF emerged from the meta-analysis, the meta-regression indicated that mood plays a significant role as moderator, with greater tDCS effects on EF in individuals with higher depressive symptoms.
LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
The limited number of studies included, the heterogeneous samples considered, and the limited generalizability to other non-invasive brain stimulation techniques and affective states.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Findings suggest that evaluating mood prior to stimulation could increase the sensitivity and specificity of tDCS application, and provide the first meta-analytic evidence in favor of the affective state-dependency hypothesis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38341155
pii: S0165-0327(24)00319-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.02.009
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Elisa Di Rosa (E)

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Italy. Electronic address: elisa.dirosa@unipd.it.

Fabio Masina (F)

IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.

Annachiara Pastorino (A)

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Italy.

Eleonora Galletti (E)

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Italy.

Filippo Gambarota (F)

Department of Developmental and Social Psychology - University of Padova, Italy.

Gianmarco Altoè (G)

Department of Developmental and Social Psychology - University of Padova, Italy.

Nicky Edelstyn (N)

School of Psychology, Keele University, UK.

Daniela Mapelli (D)

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Italy.

Classifications MeSH