Utility of Structured Follow-up Imaging after Aortic Surgery.

BACKGROUND

Although postoperative follow-up after aortic surgery is recommended by guidelines, its clinical utility is not well documented. We hypothesized that structured follow-up imaging by an aortic program would improve outcomes. We then documented radiologic findings on asymptomatic postoperative imaging.

METHODS

All patients who survived to discharge after open thoracic aortic surgery between 01/2017-07/2021 were included, excluding endocarditis. Patients who followed at our center and received scheduled imaging were compared against patients who did not. Survival was analyzed by the method of Kaplan and Meier and reintervention was assessed using the Fine-Gray subhazard function. Routine imaging was reviewed for aortic growth, pseudoaneurysm, and perigraft density.

RESULTS

After aortic surgery, the cumulative incidence of follow-up was 38.6% at 3 years postoperatively. Patients with follow-up were more likely to have a dissection and fewer comorbidities, but were similar in regards to socioeconomic factors and distance to hospital. After matching and accounting for immortal time bias, patients with follow-up had a higher reintervention rate (26.0% vs. 9.0%) with similar survival (98.7% vs. 95.2%, p=0.110) at four years. The cumulative incidence of pseudoaneurysm, significant perigraft density, and growth ≥3 mm/year on routine imaging was 49.7% at three years.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of structured follow-up imaging by an aortic program resulted in low clinical compliance. Follow-up was associated with increased rates of aortic reintervention. Clinically relevant radiologic findings were common on asymptomatic imaging and increased throughout 5-year follow-up rather than plateauing in the early postoperative period.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.