Real-Life Data on Efficacy and Safety of Letermovir for Primary Prophylaxis of Cytomegalovirus in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Recipients: Single-Center Analysis.
allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
antiviral prophylaxis
cytomegalovirus reactivation
letermovir
Journal
Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology
ISSN: 1308-5263
Titre abrégé: Turk J Haematol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 9606065
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Feb 2024
13 Feb 2024
Historique:
medline:
12
2
2024
pubmed:
12
2
2024
entrez:
12
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Introduction of letermovir (LMV) seems to improve post-transplant outcome, however delayed-onset CMV reactivations still remains a challenge. We retrospectively analyzed data of 93 adult CMV-seropositive recipients receiving LMV as CMV prophylaxis after HSCT for hematological malignancies between 2019 and 2023. Starting LMV dose was 480 mg daily, reduced to 240 mg daily in those with ciclosporin A (CsA) co-administration. CMV DNA in blood was measured using real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) weekly for the first 2 months after transplantation, then bi-weekly till the end of immunosuppressive treatment. LMV was continued to day +100 or to CMV reactivation. Median recipient age at transplant was 51 years (range 20-71). All patients received grafts from peripheral blood, mostly for myeloid acute leukemias (60%). Median time from transplantation to LMV initiation was 3 days (range 0-24). 55% of patients were transplanted from matched related donors, 32% from unrelated donors whereas 13% underwent haploidentical HSCT. Four patients (4%) had CMV "blips" while on LMV, yet drug was continued and repeated assays were negative. Only 2 patients (2%) reactivated CMV while on LMV: on days 48 and 34 after HSCT, respectively. Seven patients (7%) developed late-onset CMV reactivation after median of 124 days after HSCT (range 118-152) and were successfully treated with ganciclovir (GCV). CMV disease was not observed. Grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) occurred in 6 patients (6%) during LMV. LMV treatment was free of side effects. LMV prophylaxis was effective in preventing CMV reactivation with favorable safety profile. CMV reactivation occurred mostly after LMV discontinuation, thus extending duration of prophylaxis beyond 100 days could be beneficial.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Introduction of letermovir (LMV) seems to improve post-transplant outcome, however delayed-onset CMV reactivations still remains a challenge.
Patients and methods
UNASSIGNED
We retrospectively analyzed data of 93 adult CMV-seropositive recipients receiving LMV as CMV prophylaxis after HSCT for hematological malignancies between 2019 and 2023. Starting LMV dose was 480 mg daily, reduced to 240 mg daily in those with ciclosporin A (CsA) co-administration. CMV DNA in blood was measured using real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) weekly for the first 2 months after transplantation, then bi-weekly till the end of immunosuppressive treatment. LMV was continued to day +100 or to CMV reactivation.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Median recipient age at transplant was 51 years (range 20-71). All patients received grafts from peripheral blood, mostly for myeloid acute leukemias (60%). Median time from transplantation to LMV initiation was 3 days (range 0-24). 55% of patients were transplanted from matched related donors, 32% from unrelated donors whereas 13% underwent haploidentical HSCT. Four patients (4%) had CMV "blips" while on LMV, yet drug was continued and repeated assays were negative. Only 2 patients (2%) reactivated CMV while on LMV: on days 48 and 34 after HSCT, respectively. Seven patients (7%) developed late-onset CMV reactivation after median of 124 days after HSCT (range 118-152) and were successfully treated with ganciclovir (GCV). CMV disease was not observed. Grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) occurred in 6 patients (6%) during LMV. LMV treatment was free of side effects.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
LMV prophylaxis was effective in preventing CMV reactivation with favorable safety profile. CMV reactivation occurred mostly after LMV discontinuation, thus extending duration of prophylaxis beyond 100 days could be beneficial.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38345092
doi: 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2024.2024.0026
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM