Comparative genomics and phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast genomes of Asian Caryodaphnopsis taxa (Lauraceae).

The genus Caryodaphnopsis, a member of the Lauraceae family, is characterized by seeds that are rich in oil, as well as highly exploitable fruits and wood. The Asian taxa within this genus exhibit complex morphological variations, posing challenges to their accurate classification and impeding their effective use and development as a resource. In this study, we sequenced the chloroplast genomes of 31 individuals representing nine Asian taxa within the Caryodaphnopsis genus. Our primary objectives were to reveal structural variations in these chloroplast genomes through comparative analyses and to infer the species' phylogenetic relationships. Our findings revealed that all chloroplast genomes had a tetrad structure, ranged in length from 148,828 to 154,946 bp, and harbored 128-131 genes. Notably, contraction of the IR region led to the absence of some genes in eight taxa. A comprehensive analysis identified 1,267 long repetitive sequences and 2,176 SSRs, 286 SNPs, and 135 indels across the 31 chloroplast genomes. The Ka/Ks ratio analysis indicated potential positive selection on the matK, rpl22, and rpoC2 genes. Furthermore, we identified six variable regions as promising barcode regions. Phylogenetic analysis grouped the nine Asian taxa into six branches, with C. henryi forming the basal group from which three distinct complexes emerged. This study contributes significantly to the current understanding of the evolutionary dynamics and phylogenetic relationships within the genus Caryodaphnopsis. Furthermore, the identified molecular markers hold potential for molecular barcoding applications in population genetics, providing valuable tools for future research and conservation efforts within this diverse genus.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.