Doping of casted silk fibroin membranes with extracellular vesicles for regenerative therapy: a proof of concept.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 15 12 2023
accepted: 07 02 2024
medline: 13 2 2024
pubmed: 13 2 2024
entrez: 12 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Bioactive material concepts for targeted therapy have been an important research focus in regenerative medicine for years. The aim of this study was to investigate a proof-of-concept composite structure in the form of a membrane made of natural silk fibroin (SF) and extracellular vesicles (EVs) from gingival fibroblasts. EVs have multiple abilities to act on their target cell and can thus play crucial roles in both physiology and regeneration. This study used pH neutral, degradable SF-based membranes, which have excellent cell- and tissue-specific properties, as the carrier material. The characterization of the vesicles showed a size range between 120 and 180 nm and a high expression of the usual EV markers (e.g. CD9, CD63 and CD81), measured by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) and single-EV flow analysis (IFCM). An initial integration of the EVs into the membrane was analyzed using scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM) and vesicles were successfully detected, even if they were not homogeneously distributed in the membrane. Using direct and indirect tests, the cytocompatibility of the membranes with and without EVs could be proven and showed significant differences compared to the toxic control (p < 0.05). Additionally, proliferation of L929 cells was increased on membranes functionalized with EVs (p > 0.05).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38347108
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54014-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-54014-y
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3553

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Stevic, I., Buescher, G. & Ricklefs, F. L. Monitoring therapy efficiency in cancer through extracellular vesicles. Cells 9(1), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9010130 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/cells9010130 pubmed: 31935901 pmcid: 7017260
Babuta, M. & Szabo, G. Extracellular vesicles in inflammation: Focus on the microRNA cargo of EVs in modulation of liver diseases. J. Leukoc. Biol. 111(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/JLB.3MIR0321-156R (2021).
doi: 10.1002/JLB.3MIR0321-156R pubmed: 34755380
Batsali, A. K. et al. The role of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) in normal and abnormal hematopoiesis and their therapeutic potential. J. Clin. Med. 9(3), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030856 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/jcm9030856 pubmed: 32245055 pmcid: 7141498
Del Fattore, A. et al. Differential effects of extracellular vesicles secreted by mesenchymal stem cells from different sources on glioblastoma cells. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 15(4), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2015.997706 (2015).
doi: 10.1517/14712598.2015.997706 pubmed: 25539575
Zheng, G. et al. Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles: Regenerative and immunomodulatory effects and potential applications in sepsis. Cell Tissue Res. 374(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-018-2871-5 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s00441-018-2871-5 pubmed: 29955951
Dabrowska, S., Andrzejewska, A., Janowski, M. & Lukomska, B. Immunomodulatory and regenerative effects of mesenchymal stem cells and extracellular vesicles: Therapeutic outlook for inflammatory and degenerative diseases. Front. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.591065 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.591065 pubmed: 34194425 pmcid: 8236893
Görgens, A. et al. Identification of storage conditions stabilizing extracellular vesicles preparations. J. Extracell. Vesicles https://doi.org/10.1002/jev2.12238 (2022).
doi: 10.1002/jev2.12238 pubmed: 35716060 pmcid: 9206228
Trenkenschuh, E. et al. Enhancing the stabilization potential of lyophilization for extracellular vesicles. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 11(5), 2100538. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202100538 (2022).
doi: 10.1002/adhm.202100538
Alcaraz, M. J., Compañ, A. & Guillén, M. I. Extracellular vesicles from mesenchymal stem cells as novel treatments for musculoskeletal diseases. Cells 9(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9010098 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/cells9010098 pubmed: 31906087 pmcid: 7017209
Colao, I. L., Corteling, R., Bracewell, D. & Wall, I. Manufacturing exosomes: A promising therapeutic platform. Trends Mol. Med. 24(3), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2018.01.006 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2018.01.006 pubmed: 29449149
Gardiner, C. et al. Techniques used for the isolation and characterization of extracellular vesicles: Results of a worldwide survey. J. Extracell. Vesicles 5(1), 32945. https://doi.org/10.3402/jev.v5.32945 (2016).
doi: 10.3402/jev.v5.32945 pubmed: 27802845
Li, P., Kaslan, M., Lee, S. H., Yao, J. & Gao, Z. Progress in exosome isolation techniques. Theranostics 7(3), 789–804. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.18133 (2017).
doi: 10.7150/thno.18133 pubmed: 28255367 pmcid: 5327650
Momen-Heravi, F. et al. Current methods for the isolation of extracellular vesicles. bchm 394(10), 1253–1262. https://doi.org/10.1515/hsz-2013-0141 (2013).
doi: 10.1515/hsz-2013-0141
Patel, G. K. et al. Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 5335. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41800-2 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41800-2 pubmed: 30926864 pmcid: 6441044
Phinney, D. G. & Pittenger, M. F. Concise review: MSC-derived exosomes for cell-free therapy. Stem Cells 35(4), 851–858. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2575 (2017).
doi: 10.1002/stem.2575 pubmed: 28294454
Ramasubramanian, L., Kumar, P. & Wang, A. Engineering extracellular vesicles as nanotherapeutics for regenerative medicine. Biomolecules 10(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10010048 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/biom10010048 pubmed: 31905611 pmcid: 7023093
Riazifar, M., Pone, E. J., Lötvall, J. & Zhao, W. Stem cell extracellular vesicles: Extended messages of regeneration. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 57(1), 125–154. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-061616-030146 (2017).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-061616-030146 pubmed: 27814025
Théry, C. et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): A position statement of the international society for extracellular vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles 7(1), 1535750. https://doi.org/10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750 (2018).
doi: 10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750 pubmed: 30637094 pmcid: 6322352
Willis, G. R., Kourembanas, S. & Mitsialis, S. A. Toward exosome-based therapeutics: Isolation, heterogeneity, and fit-for-purpose potency. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2017.00063 (2017).
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2017.00063 pubmed: 29062835 pmcid: 5640880
Witwer, K. W. et al. Standardization of sample collection, isolation and analysis methods in extracellular vesicle research. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2(1), 20360. https://doi.org/10.3402/jev.v2i0.20360 (2013).
doi: 10.3402/jev.v2i0.20360
Zhu, X. et al. Comprehensive toxicity and immunogenicity studies reveal minimal effects in mice following sustained dosing of extracellular vesicles derived from HEK293T cells. J. Extracell. Vesicles 6(1), 1324730. https://doi.org/10.1080/20013078.2017.1324730 (2017).
doi: 10.1080/20013078.2017.1324730 pubmed: 28717420 pmcid: 5505007
Zhang, S. et al. Extracellular vesicles-loaded fibrin gel supports rapid neovascularization for dental pulp regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21(12), 4226. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124226 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/ijms21124226 pubmed: 32545804 pmcid: 7352754
Liu, Y. et al. Exosomes derived from stem cells from apical papilla promote craniofacial soft tissue regeneration by enhancing Cdc42-mediated vascularization. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 12(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02151-w (2021).
doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02151-w pubmed: 33482924 pmcid: 7821694
Qian, Z. et al. A moisturizing chitosan-silk fibroin dressing with silver nanoparticles-adsorbed exosomes for repairing infected wounds. J. Mater. Chem. B 8(32), 7197–7212. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TB01100B (2020).
doi: 10.1039/D0TB01100B pubmed: 32633312
Xian, X., Gong, Q., Li, C., Guo, B. & Jiang, H. Exosomes with highly angiogenic potential for possible use in pulp regeneration. J. Endod. 44(5), 751–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.12.024 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.12.024 pubmed: 29426641
Huang, C.-C., Narayanan, R., Alapati, S. & Ravindran, S. Exosomes as biomimetic tools for stem cell differentiation: Applications in dental pulp tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 111, 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.029 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.029 pubmed: 27728810 pmcid: 5293278
Wiklander, O. P. B. et al. Extracellular vesicle in vivo biodistribution is determined by cell source, route of administration and targeting. J. Extracell. Vesicles 4(1), 26316. https://doi.org/10.3402/jev.v4.26316 (2015).
doi: 10.3402/jev.v4.26316 pubmed: 25899407
Han, C. et al. Delivery of miR-675 by stem cell-derived exosomes encapsulated in silk fibroin hydrogel prevents aging-induced vascular dysfunction in mouse hindlimb. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 99, 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.122 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.122
Shi, Q. et al. GMSC-derived exosomes combined with a chitosan/silk hydrogel sponge accelerates wound healing in a diabetic rat skin defect model. Front. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00904 (2017).
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00904 pubmed: 29354065 pmcid: 5723328
Liu, X. et al. Integration of stem cell-derived exosomes with in situ hydrogel glue as a promising tissue patch for articular cartilage regeneration. Nanoscale 9(13), 4430–4438. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR00352H (2017).
doi: 10.1039/C7NR00352H pubmed: 28300264
Xu, N. et al. Wound healing effects of a Curcuma zedoaria polysaccharide with platelet-rich plasma exosomes assembled on chitosan/silk hydrogel sponge in a diabetic rat model. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 117, 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.066 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.066 pubmed: 29772339
Patil, P. P., Reagan, M. R. & Bohara, R. A. Silk fibroin and silk-based biomaterial derivatives for ideal wound dressings. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 164, 4613–4627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.041 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.041 pubmed: 32814099 pmcid: 7849047
Kopp, A. et al. Effect of process parameters on additive-free electrospinning of regenerated silk fibroin nonwovens. Bioact. Mater. 5(2), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.010 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.010 pubmed: 32123778 pmcid: 7036448
Kopp, A. et al. Production and characterization of porous fibroin scaffolds for regenerative medical application. In Vivo (Brooklyn) 33(3), 757–762. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11536 (2019).
doi: 10.21873/invivo.11536
Chouhan, D. & Mandal, B. B. Silk biomaterials in wound healing and skin regeneration therapeutics: From bench to bedside. Acta Biomater. 103, 24–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.050 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.050 pubmed: 31805409
Thangavel, P., Ramachandran, B., Kannan, R. & Muthuvijayan, V. Biomimetic hydrogel loaded with silk and <scp>l</scp> -proline for tissue engineering and wound healing applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 105(6), 1401–1408. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33675 (2017).
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33675
Buser, D., Brägger, U., Lang, N. P. & Nyman, S. Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 1(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010104.x (1990).
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010104.x pubmed: 2099209
Ricklefs, F. L. et al. Imaging flow cytometry facilitates multiparametric characterization of extracellular vesicles in malignant brain tumours. J. Extracell. Vesicles 8(1), 1588555. https://doi.org/10.1080/20013078.2019.1588555 (2019).
doi: 10.1080/20013078.2019.1588555 pubmed: 30949309 pmcid: 6442086
Tajirian, A. L. & Goldberg, D. J. A review of sutures and other skin closure materials. J. Cosmet. Laser Ther. 12(6), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2010.538413 (2010).
doi: 10.3109/14764172.2010.538413 pubmed: 21142740
Chen, K., Li, Y., Li, Y., Pan, W. & Tan, G. Silk fibroin combined with electrospinning as a promising strategy for tissue regeneration. Macromol. Biosci. 23(2), 2200380. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202200380 (2023).
doi: 10.1002/mabi.202200380
Kundu, B., Rajkhowa, R., Kundu, S. C. & Wang, X. Silk fibroin biomaterials for tissue regenerations. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65(4), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.043 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.043 pubmed: 23137786
Chen, C., Chuanbao, C., Xilan, M., Yin, T. & Hesun, Z. Preparation of non-woven mats from all-aqueous silk fibroin solution with electrospinning method. Polymer (Guildf) 47(18), 6322–6327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.07.009 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.07.009
Ha, S. W., Tonelli, A. E. & Hudson, S. M. Structural studies of Bombyx mori silk fibroin during regeneration from solutions and wet fiber spinning. Biomacromolecules 6(3), 1722–1731. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm050010y (2005).
doi: 10.1021/bm050010y pubmed: 15877399
Bayraktar, O., Malay, O., Ozgarip, Y. & Batigun, A. Silk fibroin as a novel coating material for controlled release of theophylline. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 60(3), 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2005.02.002 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2005.02.002 pubmed: 15996578
Srivastava, C. M., Purwar, R., Kannaujia, R. & Sharma, D. Flexible silk fibroin films for wound dressing. Fibers Polym. 16(5), 1020–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-015-1020-y (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s12221-015-1020-y
Song, Y. et al. Silk sericin patches delivering miRNA-29-enriched extracellular vesicles-decorated myoblasts (SPEED) enhances regeneration and functional repair after severe skeletal muscle injury. Biomaterials 287, 121630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121630 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121630 pubmed: 35816980
Cunnane, E. M. et al. Extracellular vesicles enhance the remodeling of cell-free silk vascular scaffolds in rat aortae. AC S Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12(24), 26955–26965. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c06609 (2022).
doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c06609
Kyung Kim, D., Lee, S., Kim, M., Jeong, Y. & Lee, S. Exosome-coated silk fibroin 3D-scaffold for inducing osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. Chem. Eng. J. 406, 127080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127080 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127080
Wang, Z. et al. Engineered multifunctional Silk fibroin cryogel loaded with exosomes to promote the regeneration of annulus fibrosus. Appl. Mater. Today 29, 101632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101632 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101632
Zhang, X., Cao, C., Ma, X. & Li, Y. Optimization of macroporous 3-D silk fibroin scaffolds by salt-leaching procedure in organic solvent-free conditions. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4476-3 (2012).
doi: 10.1007/s10856-011-4476-3 pubmed: 23183963
Kopp, A. et al. Influence of the casting concentration on the mechanical and optical properties of Fa/CaCl2-derived silk fibroin membranes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21(18), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21186704 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/ijms21186704
Shin, H., Ko, H. & Kim, M. Cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of Zirconia (Y-TZP) posts with various dental cements. Restor. Dent. Endod. 41(3), 167. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.3.167 (2016).
doi: 10.5395/rde.2016.41.3.167 pubmed: 27508157 pmcid: 4977346
Wang, M. O. et al. Evaluation of the in vitro cytotoxicity of cross-linked biomaterials. Biomacromolecules 14(5), 1321–1329. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm301962f (2013).
doi: 10.1021/bm301962f pubmed: 23627804 pmcid: 3670822
Brackett, M. G. et al. Cytotoxic response of three cell lines exposed in vitro to dental endodontic sealers. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 95B(2), 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31727 (2010).
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31727
Mandal, B. B. & Kundu, S. C. Cell proliferation and migration in silk fibroin 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials 30(15), 2956–2965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.006 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.006 pubmed: 19249094
Jiang, S. et al. Effects of different aperture-sized type I collagen/silk fibroin scaffolds on the proliferation and differentiation of human dental pulp cells. Regen. Biomater. https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbab028 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/rb/rbab028 pubmed: 34934509 pmcid: 8684499
Jung, O. et al. Improved in vitro test procedure for full assessment of the cytocompatibility of degradable magnesium based on ISO 10993-5/-12. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20020255 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/ijms20020255 pubmed: 31906014 pmcid: 6982081

Auteurs

Sandra Fuest (S)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Division of Regenerative Orofacial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. s.fuest@uke.de.

Amanda Salviano-Silva (A)

Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Cecile L Maire (CL)

Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Yong Xu (Y)

Department of Biohybrid and Medical Textiles (BioTex), AME - Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Helmholtz Institute of RWTH Aachen University and Hospital, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

Christian Apel (C)

Department of Biohybrid and Medical Textiles (BioTex), AME - Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Helmholtz Institute of RWTH Aachen University and Hospital, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

Audrey Laure Céline Grust (ALC)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Division of Regenerative Orofacial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Arianna Delle Coste (A)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Division of Regenerative Orofacial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Martin Gosau (M)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Franz L Ricklefs (FL)

Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Ralf Smeets (R)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Division of Regenerative Orofacial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH