Saturated buffers: Improvements and issues.


Journal

Journal of environmental quality
ISSN: 1537-2537
Titre abrégé: J Environ Qual
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0330666

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 24 05 2023
accepted: 10 01 2024
medline: 13 2 2024
pubmed: 13 2 2024
entrez: 13 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Saturated buffers are a newly developed agricultural best management practice used to redirect tile flow away from waterways, thereby mitigating nutrient losses and downstream eutrophication. This study evaluated the potential benefits of a novel saturated buffer design, which included pitchfork-shaped (PF) dispersion lines and a backflow check valve, that was installed alongside a traditional or standard (ST) buffer on a field in Moultrie County, Illinois, in the spring of 2019. Daily flow measurements and routine water samples were used to monitor the movement of water through both buffers and estimate nutrient loads. During observation days in 2020 and 2021, the PF buffer diverted 35% and 1.9% of incoming tile flow, respectively, while the ST buffer increased effluent rates by 116% and 137% over the same period. Both the PF and ST buffers experienced backflow from 30% to 47% of the monitoring period, well above the often reported 5%. Ultimately, the efficacy of saturated buffers could be improved with minimal, low-cost additions to their designs. Check valves are a simple supplement to saturated buffer design that can enhance flow diversion and potential nutrient removal. Added dispersion lines provide more opportunity for diversion of tile flow; however, they require more land to be removed from agricultural production and could increase backflow volumes, so the costs and benefits should be weighed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38348512
doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20548
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Environmental Quality © 2024 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.

Références

Carstensen, M. V., Hashemi, F., Hoffmann, C. C., Zak, D., Audet, J., & Kronvang, B. (2020). Efficiency of mitigation measures targeting nutrient losses from agricultural drainage systems: A review. Ambio, 49(11), 1820-1837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01345-5
Chandrasoma, J. M., Christianson, R. D., & Christianson, L. E. (2019). Saturated buffers: What is their potential impact across the US Midwest? Agricultural & Environmental Letters, 4(1), 180059. https://doi.org/10.2134/ael2018.11.0059
Chandrasoma, J. M., Christianson, R. D., Cooke, R. A. C., Davidson, P. C., Lee, D., & Christianson, L. E. (2022). Saturated buffer design flow and performance in Illinois. Journal of Environmental Quality, 51, 389-398. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20344
Davis, M. P., Groh, T. A., Jaynes, D. B., Parkin, T. B., & Isenhart, T. M. (2018). Nitrous oxide emissions from saturated riparian buffers: Are we trading a water quality problem for an air quality problem? Journal of Environmental Quality, 48, 261-269. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2018.03.0127
Dickey, L. C., McEachran, A. R., Rutherford, C. J., Rehmann, C. R., Perez, M. A., Groh, T. A., & Isenhart, T. M. (2021). Slope stability of streambanks at saturated riparian buffer sites. Journal of Environmental Quality, 50, 1430-1439. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20281
Groh, T. A., Davis, M. P., Isenhart, T. M., Jaynes, D. B., & Parkin, T. B. (2019). In situ denitrification in saturated riparian buffers. Journal of Environmental Quality, 48, 376-384. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2018.0.0125
Hollander, M., Wolfe, D. A., & Chicken, E. (2014). Nonparametric statistical methods (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Illinois EPA. (2021). Illinois nutrient loss reduction strategy (NLRS) biennial report 2021. Illinois EPA. https://epa.illinois.gov/content/dam/soi/en/web/epa/topics/water-quality/watershed-management/excess-nutrients/documents/nlrs-biennial-report-2021_FINAL.pdf
Jacquemin, S. J., McGlinch, G., Dirksen, T., & Clayton, A. (2020). On the potential for saturated buffers in northwest Ohio to remediate nutrients from agricultural runoff. PeerJ, 2020(4), e9007. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9007
Jaynes, D. B., & Isenhart, T. M. (2014). Reconnecting tile drainage to riparian buffer hydrology for enhanced nitrate removal. Journal of Environmental Quality, 43(2), 631-638. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.08.0331
Jaynes, D. B., & Isenhart, T. M. (2019a). Performance of saturated riparian buffers in Iowa, USA. Journal of Environmental Quality, 48(2), 289-296. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2018.03.0115
Jaynes, D. B., & Isenhart, T. M. (2019b). Increasing infiltration into saturated riparian buffers by adding additional distribution pipes. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 74(6), 545-553. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.74.6.545
McEachran, A. R., Dicky, L. C., Rehmann, C. R., Groh, T. A., Isenhart, T. M., Perez, M. A., & Rutherford, C. J. (2019). Improving the effectiveness of saturated riparian buffers for removing nitrate from subsurface drainage. Journal of Environmental Quality, 49, 1624-1632. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20160
Pavelis, G. A. (1987). Farm drainage in the United States: History, status, and prospects (No. 1455). US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
Soil Survey Staff. (2023). Natural resources conservation service. Web Soil Survey, United States Department of Agriculture. https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
Streeter, M. T., & Schilling, K. E. (2021). Quantifying the effectiveness of a saturated buffer to reduce tile NO3-N concentrations in eastern Iowa. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193, 500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09297-3
Tomer, M. D., Porter, S. E., James, D. E., & VanHorn, J. D. (2017). Potential for saturated buffers to treat tile drainage among 32 watersheds representing Iowa landscapes. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 75(4), 453-459. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2020.00129
USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service. (2020). Conservation practice standard for saturated buffers (Code 604). USDA-NRCS. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/
Utt, N., Jaynes, D., & Albertsen, J. (2015). Demonstrate and evaluate saturated buffers at field scale to reduce nitrates and phosphorus from subsurface field drainage systems. http://www.saturatedbufferstrips.com/images/final_report.pdf
Weil, R. R., Islam, K. R., Stine, M. A., Gruver, J. B., & Samson-Liebig, S. E. (2003). Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: A simplified method for laboratory and field use. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 18, 3-17.

Auteurs

Emma E Eldridge (EE)

Department of Forestry, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, USA.

Jon E Schoonover (JE)

Department of Forestry, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, USA.

Karl W J Williard (KWJ)

Department of Forestry, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, USA.

Amir Sadeghpour (A)

Department of Plant, Soil, and Agricultural Systems, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, USA.

Jackie C Gillespie (JC)

Department of Forestry, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, USA.

Classifications MeSH