Right gastroepiploic artery length determined anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer- a prospective cohort study.
Journal
International journal of surgery (London, England)
ISSN: 1743-9159
Titre abrégé: Int J Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101228232
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Feb 2024
13 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
11
10
2023
accepted:
29
01
2024
medline:
13
2
2024
pubmed:
13
2
2024
entrez:
13
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This prospective cohort study, conducted at a high-volume esophageal cancer center from July 2019 to July 2022, aimed to investigate the link between the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) length and anastomotic leakage (AL) rates following minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Real-world data on stomach blood supply in the Chinese population were examined. A total of 516 cases were enrolled, categorized into two groups based on the Youden index-determined optimal cut-off value for the relative length of RGEA (length of RGEA/length of gastric conduit, 64.69%) through ROC analysis: Group SR (short RGEA) and Group LR (long RGEA). The primary observation parameter was the relationship between AL incidence and the ratio of direct blood supply from RGEA. Secondary parameters included the mean length of the right gastroepiploic artery, greater curvature, and the connection type between right and left gastroepiploic vessels. Patient data were prospectively recorded in electronic case report forms. The study revealed median lengths of 43.60 cm for greater curvature, 43.16 cm for the gastric conduit, and 26.75 cm for RGEA. AL, the most common postoperative complication, showed a significant difference between groups (16.88% vs. 8.84%, P=0.01). Multivariable binary logistic regression identified Group SR and LR (Odds ratio: 2.651, 95% CI: 1.124-6.250, P=0.03) and Neoadjuvant therapy (Odds ratio: 2.479, 95% CI: 1.374-4.473, P=0.00) as independent predictors of AL. The study emphasizes the crucial role of RGEA length in determining AL incidence in MIE for esophageal cancer. Preserving RGEA and fostering capillary arches between RGEA and LGEA are recommended strategies to mitigate AL risk.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This prospective cohort study, conducted at a high-volume esophageal cancer center from July 2019 to July 2022, aimed to investigate the link between the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) length and anastomotic leakage (AL) rates following minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Real-world data on stomach blood supply in the Chinese population were examined.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
A total of 516 cases were enrolled, categorized into two groups based on the Youden index-determined optimal cut-off value for the relative length of RGEA (length of RGEA/length of gastric conduit, 64.69%) through ROC analysis: Group SR (short RGEA) and Group LR (long RGEA). The primary observation parameter was the relationship between AL incidence and the ratio of direct blood supply from RGEA. Secondary parameters included the mean length of the right gastroepiploic artery, greater curvature, and the connection type between right and left gastroepiploic vessels. Patient data were prospectively recorded in electronic case report forms.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The study revealed median lengths of 43.60 cm for greater curvature, 43.16 cm for the gastric conduit, and 26.75 cm for RGEA. AL, the most common postoperative complication, showed a significant difference between groups (16.88% vs. 8.84%, P=0.01). Multivariable binary logistic regression identified Group SR and LR (Odds ratio: 2.651, 95% CI: 1.124-6.250, P=0.03) and Neoadjuvant therapy (Odds ratio: 2.479, 95% CI: 1.374-4.473, P=0.00) as independent predictors of AL.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The study emphasizes the crucial role of RGEA length in determining AL incidence in MIE for esophageal cancer. Preserving RGEA and fostering capillary arches between RGEA and LGEA are recommended strategies to mitigate AL risk.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38349216
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001181
pii: 01279778-990000000-01075
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.