A strategy to implement the American College of Sports Medicine's Exercise is Medicine® (EIM) initiative in a community oncology clinic.

Barriers Exercise is Medicine (EIM) in oncology Facilitators Feasibility Implementation Organizational context Physical activity

Journal

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
ISSN: 1433-7339
Titre abrégé: Support Care Cancer
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9302957

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 25 06 2023
accepted: 16 01 2024
medline: 14 2 2024
pubmed: 13 2 2024
entrez: 13 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Despite proven benefits, few cancer patients exercise during chemotherapy. The American College of Sports Medicine's Exercise is Medicine® (EIM) initiative describes a model to integrate exercise into oncology care, based upon assessing patients' ability to exercise safely, advising on exercise benefits, and referring patients to exercise. We developed and tested a strategy to implement EIM in a community-based oncology clinic, to assess-advise-refer 20 patients undergoing chemotherapy to a 3-month online exercise class, and measured implementation outcomes. Using a community-based provider participation in research (CBPPR) model, researchers and staff co-designed and tested a 4-level implementation strategy, with a goal of assessing-advising-referring 20 cancer patients to exercise. Surveys and interviews were conducted with 12 (100%) staff at baseline and post-implementation on acceptability/appropriateness/feasibility, perceptions of individual implementation roles, and organizational strengths/conditions. Data were analyzed using correlations, t-tests, and content analysis. The proposed strategy was revised in collaboration with staff who requested assistance for recruitment and data collection. EIM was successfully implemented with 41 (92%) patients assessed, 37 (90%) advised, and 22 (60%) referred to exercise classes. Barriers to implementation were staff shortages and time constraints; facilitators included research team supports. Staff's perceived organizational strengths were positively correlated with exercise promotion acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. There were no statistically significant changes in implementation outcomes (acceptability/appropriateness/feasibility) post-implementation. Using a collaborative model, EIM was successfully implemented in a community oncology clinic; however, the clinic required significant support from the research team. Adaptations to the EIM process may be required to improve implementation outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38349581
doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08330-8
pii: 10.1007/s00520-024-08330-8
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

156

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Global Health and Health Services
ID : No ID

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Schmitz KH et al (2019) Exercise is medicine in oncology: engaging clinicians to help patients move through cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 69(6):468–484
doi: 10.3322/caac.21579 pubmed: 31617590
Campbell KL et al (2019) Exercise guidelines for cancer survivors: consensus statement from international multidisciplinary roundtable. Med Sci Sports Exerc 51(11):2375–2390
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002116 pubmed: 31626055
Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee (2018) 2018 Physical activity guidelines advisory committee scientific report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC
Department of Health-Quality Health, Quality of life of cancer survivors in England—report on a pilot survey using patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) (2012) Crown Copyright
Blanchard CM, Courneya KS, Stein K (2008) Cancer survivors’ adherence to lifestyle behavior recommendations and associations with health-related quality of life: results from the American Cancer Society’s SCS-II. J Clin Oncol 26(13):2198–2204
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.6217 pubmed: 18445845
Webb J, Foster J, Poulter E (2016) Increasing the frequency of physical activity very brief advice for cancer patients. Development of an intervention using the behaviour change wheel. Public Health 133:45–56
doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.12.009 pubmed: 26822162
Mayer D, Terrin N, Menon U (2007) Health behaviors in cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum 34:643–651 (e.a.)
doi: 10.1188/07.ONF.643-651 pubmed: 17573323
Nyrop KA et al (2016) Physical activity communication between oncology providers and patients with early-stage breast, colon, or prostate cancer. Cancer 122(3):470–476
doi: 10.1002/cncr.29786 pubmed: 26566177
ACSM (2021) Exercise is Medicine. April 9, 2021; 2021:[Available from: https://www.exerciseismedicine.org/
Greenwood JL, Joy EA, Stanford JB (2010) The physical activity vital sign: a primary care tool to guide counseling for obesity. J Phys Act Health 7(5):571–576
doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.5.571 pubmed: 20864751
Golightly YM et al (2017) Physical activity as a vital sign: a systematic review. Prev Chronic Dis 14:E123
doi: 10.5888/pcd14.170030 pubmed: 29191260
Azam F et al (2019) Performance status assessment by using ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) score for cancer patients by oncology healthcare professionals. Case Rep Oncol 12(3):728–736
doi: 10.1159/000503095 pubmed: 31616281
Eccles MP, Mittman BS (2006) Welcome to implementation science. Implement Sci 1(1):1–3
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-1
Teal R et al (2012) Implementing community-based provider participation in research: an empirical study. Implement Sci 7:41
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-41 pubmed: 22568935
Weiner BJ et al (2017) Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci 12(1):108
doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3 pubmed: 28851459
Proctor E et al (2011) Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health 38:65–76
doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7 pubmed: 20957426
Kim E et al (2022) Organizational contexts, implementation processes, and capacity outcomes of multicultural, multilingual home-based programs in public initiative: a mixed-method study. J Adv Nurs 78:3409–3426
doi: 10.1111/jan.15276 pubmed: 35986591
Ferlie E et al (2005) The nonspread of innovations: the mediating role of professionals. Acad Manag J 48(1):117–134
doi: 10.5465/amj.2005.15993150
Weiner BJ, Lewis MA, Linnan LA (2009) Using organization theory to understand the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs. Health Educ Res 24(2):292–305
doi: 10.1093/her/cyn019 pubmed: 18469319
Weiner BJ (2009) A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implement Sci 4:67
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-67 pubmed: 19840381
Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Green LW (2018) Building capacity for evidence-based public health: reconciling the pulls of practice and the push of research. Annu Rev Public Health 39:27–53
doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014746 pubmed: 29166243
Lala D et al (2016) Developing a model of care for healing pressure ulcers with electrical stimulation therapy for persons with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 22(4):277–287
doi: 10.1310/sci2204-277 pubmed: 29339869
Witmer H, Mellinger MS (2016) Organizational resilience: nonprofit organizations’ response to change. Work 54(2):255–265
doi: 10.3233/WOR-162303 pubmed: 27232060
Agarwal S, Garg A (2012) The importance of communication within organizations: a research on two hotels in Uttarakhand. IOSR J Bus Manag 3(2):40–49
doi: 10.9790/487X-0324049
Rajhans K (2018) Effective communication management: a key to stakeholder relationship management in project-based organizations. IUP J Soft Skills 12(4):47–66
Bryson SA et al (2017) What are effective strategies for implementing trauma-informed care in youth inpatient psychiatric and residential treatment settings? A realist systematic review. Int J Ment Health Syst 11:36
doi: 10.1186/s13033-017-0137-3 pubmed: 28503194
Brock DP et al (2019) Building and sustaining community capacity to address childhood obesity: a 3-year mixed-methods case study of a community-academic advisory board. Fam Community Health 42(1):62–79
doi: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000212 pubmed: 30431470
Powell BJ et al (2015) A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci 10(1):21
doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1 pubmed: 25889199
Constantin A (2018) Human subject research: international and regional human rights standards. Health Human Rights J 20(2):137–148
Kantur D, Iseri-Say A (2015) Measuring organizational resilience: a scale development. J Bus Econ Finance 4(3):456–472
Shea CM et al (2014) Organizational readiness for implementing change: a psychometric assessment of a new measure. Implement Sci 9:7
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-7 pubmed: 24410955
IBM (2023) IBM SPSS Statistics. [cited 2023 feb 24]; Available from: https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics
Prior L (2020) Content Analysis, In The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research P. Leavy., Editor. Oxford University Press. p. 541–568
Hardcastle SJ et al (2018) Factors influencing non-participation in an exercise program and attitudes towards physical activity amongst cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 26(4):1289–1295
doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3952-9 pubmed: 29090387
Kirkham AA et al (2018) Effectiveness of oncologist-referred exercise and healthy eating programming as a part of supportive adjuvant care for early breast cancer. Oncologist 23(1):105–115
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0141 pubmed: 28982801
Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard RJ (1992) Revision of the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q). Can J Sport Sci 17(4):338–345
pubmed: 1330274
Kennedy MA et al (2022) Implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review. J Cancer Surviv 16(4):865–881
doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01080-0 pubmed: 34510366
Ball TJ et al (2016) Predictive validity of an adult physical activity “vital sign” recorded in electronic health records. J Phys Act Health 13(4):403–408
doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0210 pubmed: 26445164
Eide S, Feng ZP (2020) Doxorubicin chemotherapy-induced “chemo-brain”: meta-analysis. Eur J Pharmacol 881:173078
doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173078 pubmed: 32505665
Weiner BJ, Amick H, Lee SY (2008) Conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness for change: a review of the literature in health services research and other fields. Med Care Res Rev 65(4):379–436
doi: 10.1177/1077558708317802 pubmed: 18511812

Auteurs

Eunjung Kim (E)

Child, Family and Population Health Nursing, University of Washington, Box 357262, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. eunjungk@uw.edu.

Catherine Duggan (C)

Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Christian Helfrich (C)

Health System and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.

Hyesang Yoon (H)

Child, Family and Population Health Nursing, University of Washington, Box 357262, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

Ben Chue (B)

Lifespring Cancer Treatment Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Anna Yeojin Moon (AY)

Lifespring Cancer Treatment Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Easter Ho (E)

Lifespring Cancer Treatment Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH