Plant invasion and naturalization are influenced by genome size, ecology and economic use globally.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Feb 2024
13 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
12
07
2023
accepted:
31
01
2024
medline:
14
2
2024
pubmed:
14
2
2024
entrez:
13
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Human factors and plant characteristics are important drivers of plant invasions, which threaten ecosystem integrity, biodiversity and human well-being. However, while previous studies often examined a limited number of factors or focused on a specific invasion stage (e.g., naturalization) for specific regions, a multi-factor and multi-stage analysis at the global scale is lacking. Here, we employ a multi-level framework to investigate the interplay between plant characteristics (genome size, Grime's adaptive CSR-strategies and native range size) and economic use and how these factors collectively affect plant naturalization and invasion success worldwide. While our findings derived from structural equation models highlight the substantial contribution of human assistance in both the naturalization and spread of invasive plants, we also uncovered the pivotal role of species' adaptive strategies among the factors studied, and the significantly varying influence of these factors across invasion stages. We further revealed that the effects of genome size on plant invasions were partially mediated by species adaptive strategies and native range size. Our study provides insights into the complex and dynamic process of plant invasions and identifies its key drivers worldwide.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38351066
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45667-4
pii: 10.1038/s41467-024-45667-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1330Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : 32171588
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Bellard, C., Cassey, P. & Blackburn, T. M. Alien species as a driver of recent extinctions. Biol. Lett. 12, 20150623 (2016).
pubmed: 26888913
pmcid: 4780541
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0623
Blackburn, T. M., Bellard, C. & Ricciardi, A. Alien versus native species as drivers of recent extinctions. Front. Ecol. Environ. 17, 203–207 (2019).
doi: 10.1002/fee.2020
Sax, D. F. & Gaines, S. D. Species invasions and extinction: The future of native biodiversity on islands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 105, 11490–11497 (2008).
pubmed: 18695231
pmcid: 2556416
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802290105
Capinha, C., Essl, F., Seebens, H., Moser, D. & Pereira, H. M. The dispersal of alien species redefines biogeography in the Anthropocene. Science 348, 1248–1251 (2015).
pubmed: 26068851
doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8913
Yang, Q. et al. The global loss of floristic uniqueness. Nat. Commun. 12, 7290 (2021).
pubmed: 34911960
pmcid: 8674287
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27603-y
Diagne, C. et al. High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Nature 592, 571–576 (2021).
pubmed: 33790468
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03405-6
IPBES. Summary for policymakers of the thematic assessment report on invasive alien species and their control of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. In (eds. Roy, H. E. et al.) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7430692 (IPBES Secretariat, 2023).
Novoa, A. et al. Global costs of plant invasions must not be underestimated. NeoBiota 69, 75–78 (2021).
doi: 10.3897/neobiota.69.74121
Seebens, H. et al. No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nat. Commun. 8, 14435 (2017).
pubmed: 28198420
pmcid: 5316856
doi: 10.1038/ncomms14435
Seebens, H. et al. Projecting the continental accumulation of alien species through to 2050. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 970–982 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.15333
van Kleunen, M. et al. Economic use of plants is key to their naturalization success. Nat. Commun. 11, 3201 (2020).
pubmed: 32581263
pmcid: 7314777
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16982-3
Balestri, E., Vallerini, F., Menicagli, V., Barnaba, S. & Lardicci, C. Biotic resistance and vegetative propagule pressure co-regulate the invasion success of a marine clonal macrophyte. Sci. Rep. 8, 16621 (2018).
pubmed: 30413748
pmcid: 6226502
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35015-0
Lockwood, J. L., Cassey, P. & Blackburn, T. M. The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Divers. Distrib. 15, 904–910 (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00594.x
Kubešová, M., Moravcová, L., Suda, J., Jarošík, V. & Pyšek, P. Naturalized plants have smaller genomes than their non-invading relatives: A flow cytometric analysis of the Czech alien flora. Preslia 82, 81–96 (2010).
Lopes, S. et al. Genome size variation in Cactaceae and its relationship with invasiveness and seed traits. Biol. Invasions 23, 3047–3062 (2021).
doi: 10.1007/s10530-021-02557-w
Pyšek, P. et al. Small genome separates native and invasive populations in an ecologically important cosmopolitan grass. Ecology 99, 79–90 (2018).
pubmed: 29313970
doi: 10.1002/ecy.2068
Pyšek, P. et al. Small genome size and variation in ploidy levels support the naturalization of vascular plants but constrain their invasive spread. New Phytol. 239, 2389–2403 (2023).
pubmed: 37438886
doi: 10.1111/nph.19135
Knight, C. A., Molinari, N. A. & Petrov, D. A. The large genome constraint hypothesis: Evolution, ecology and phenotype. Ann. Bot. 95, 177–190 (2005).
pubmed: 15596465
pmcid: 4246716
doi: 10.1093/aob/mci011
Simonin, K. A. & Roddy, A. B. Genome downsizing, physiological novelty, and the global dominance of flowering plants. PLOS Biol. 16, e2003706 (2018).
pubmed: 29324757
pmcid: 5764239
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003706
Beaulieu, J. M. et al. Correlated evolution of genome size and seed mass. New Phytol. 173, 422–437 (2007).
pubmed: 17204088
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01919.x
Carta, A., Mattana, E., Dickie, J. & Vandelook, F. Correlated evolution of seed mass and genome size varies among life forms in flowering plants. Seed Sci. Res. 32, 46–52 (2022).
doi: 10.1017/S0960258522000071
Bennett, M. D. Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 181, 109–135 (1972).
pubmed: 4403285
doi: 10.1098/rspb.1972.0042
Sinjushin, A. A. The duration of the life cycle is associated with C-value and affects reproductive features in the Fabeae, the tribe with largest genomes in Fabaceae. Flora 285, 151954 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2021.151954
Pellicer, J., Hidalgo, O., Dodsworth, S. & Leitch, I. J. Genome size diversity and its impact on the evolution of land plants. Genes 9, 88 (2018).
pubmed: 29443885
pmcid: 5852584
doi: 10.3390/genes9020088
Suda, J., Meyerson, L. A., Leitch, I. J. & Pyšek, P. The hidden side of plant invasions: The role of genome size. New Phytol. 205, 994–1007 (2015).
pubmed: 25323486
doi: 10.1111/nph.13107
te Beest, M. et al. The more the better? the role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. Ann. Bot. 109, 19–45 (2012).
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr277
Parker, J. D. Do invasive species perform better in their new ranges? Ecology 94, 985–994 (2013).
pubmed: 23858639
doi: 10.1890/12-1810.1
van Kleunen, M., Weber, E. & Fischer, M. A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol. Lett. 13, 235–245 (2010).
pubmed: 20002494
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01418.x
Jenkins, C. & Keller, S. R. A phylogenetic comparative study of preadaptation for invasiveness in the genus Silene (Caryophyllaceae). Biol. Invasions 13, 1471–1486 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s10530-010-9907-4
Fristoe, T. S. et al. Dimensions of invasiveness: Links between local abundance, geographic range size, and habitat breadth in Europe’s alien and native floras. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 118, 1–11 (2021).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021173118
Pierce, S. et al. A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide. Funct. Ecol. 31, 444–457 (2017).
doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12722
Pierce, S., Maffi, D., Faoro, F., Cerabolini, B. E. L. & Spada, A. The leaf anatomical trade-offs associated with plant ecological strategy variation. Plant Ecol. 223, 1233–1246 (2022).
doi: 10.1007/s11258-022-01270-5
Díaz, S. et al. The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529, 167–171 (2016).
pubmed: 26700811
doi: 10.1038/nature16489
Guo, W.-Y. et al. Domestic gardens play a dominant role in selecting alien species with adaptive strategies that facilitate naturalization. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 28, 628–639 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/geb.12882
Guo, W. et al. The role of adaptive strategies in plant naturalization. Ecol. Lett. 21, 1380–1389 (2018).
pubmed: 29974602
doi: 10.1111/ele.13104
Freckleton, R. P. & Watkinson, A. R. Asymmetric competition between plant species. Funct. Ecol. 15, 615–623 (2001).
doi: 10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00558.x
Grime, J. P. & Pierce, S. The Evolutionary Strategies that Shape Ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118223246 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2012).
Wingler, A. & Sandel, B. Relationships of the competitor, stress tolerator, ruderal functional strategies of grass species with lifespan, photosynthetic type, naturalization and climate. AoB PLANTS 15, 1–10 (2023).
doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plad021
Pyšek, P., Křivánek, M. & Jarošík, V. Planting intensity, residence time, and species traits determine invasion success of alien woody species. Ecology 90, 2734–2744 (2009).
pubmed: 19886483
doi: 10.1890/08-0857.1
Pyšek, P. et al. Naturalization of central European plants in North America: Species traits, habitats, propagule pressure, residence time. Ecology 96, 762–774 (2015).
pubmed: 26236872
doi: 10.1890/14-1005.1
Rejmánek, M. A theory of seed plant invasiveness: The first sketch. Biol. Conserv. 78, 171–181 (1996).
doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(96)00026-2
Liao, H. et al. The role of functional strategies in global plant distribution. Ecography 44, 493–503 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/ecog.05476
van Kleunen, M., Johnson, S. D. & Fischer, M. Predicting naturalization of southern African Iridaceae in other regions. J. Appl. Ecol. 44, 594–603 (2007).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01304.x
Dawson, W., Burslem, D. F. R. P. & Hulme, P. E. Factors explaining alien plant invasion success in a tropical ecosystem differ at each stage of invasion. J. Ecol. 97, 657–665 (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01519.x
Divíšek, J. et al. Similarity of introduced plant species to native ones facilitates naturalization, but differences enhance invasion success. Nat. Commun. 9, 4631 (2018).
pubmed: 30401825
pmcid: 6219509
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06995-4
Essl, F. et al. Drivers of the relative richness of naturalized and invasive plant species on Earth. AoB PLANTS 11, 1–13 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plz051
Omer, A. et al. The role of phylogenetic relatedness on alien plant success depends on the stage of invasion. Nat. Plants 8, 906–914 (2022). 2022 88.
pubmed: 35953709
doi: 10.1038/s41477-022-01216-9
Blackburn, T. M. et al. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 333–339 (2011).
pubmed: 21601306
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023
Pyšek, P. et al. Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (2nd edition): Checklist update, taxonomic diversity and invasion patterns. Preslia 84, 155–255 (2012).
Richardson, D. M., Pyšek, P. & Carlton, J. T. A Compendium of Essential Concepts and Terminology in Invasion Ecology. In Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton 409–420 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444329988.ch30 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).
Richardson, D. M. & Pyšek, P. Naturalization of introduced plants: Ecological drivers of biogeographical patterns. New Phytol. 196, 383–396 (2012).
pubmed: 22943470
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04292.x
Pyšek, P. et al. MAcroecological Framework for Invasive Aliens (MAFIA): disentangling large-scale context dependence in biological invasions. NeoBiota 62, 407–461 (2020).
doi: 10.3897/neobiota.62.52787
van Kleunen, M., Dawson, W. & Maurel, N. Characteristics of successful alien plants. Mol. Ecol. 24, 1954–1968 (2015).
pubmed: 25421056
doi: 10.1111/mec.13013
Palma, E., Vesk, P. A., White, M., Baumgartner, J. B. & Catford, J. A. Plant functional traits reflect different dimensions of species invasiveness. Ecology 102, 1–14 (2021).
doi: 10.1002/ecy.3317
Banerjee, A. K., Prajapati, J., Bhowmick, A. R., Huang, Y. & Mukherjee, A. Different factors influence naturalization and invasion processes – A case study of Indian alien flora provides management insights. J. Environ. Manag. 294, 113054 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113054
Guo, K. et al. Ruderals naturalize, competitors invade: Varying roles of plant adaptive strategies along the invasion continuum. Funct. Ecol. 36, 2469–2479 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.14145
Moodley, D., Geerts, S., Richardson, D. M. & Wilson, J. R. U. Different traits determine introduction, naturalization and invasion success in woody plants: Proteaceae as a Test Case. PLoS ONE 8, e75078 (2013).
pubmed: 24086442
pmcid: 3782508
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075078
Bürkner, P. C. brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J. Stat. Softw. 80, 1–28 (2017).
Grace, J. B. et al. Guidelines for a graph-theoretic implementation of structural equation modeling. Ecosphere 3, art73 (2012).
doi: 10.1890/ES12-00048.1
Gioria, M. et al. Persistent soil seed banks promote naturalisation and invasiveness in flowering plants. Ecol. Lett. 24, 1655–1667 (2021).
pubmed: 34031959
pmcid: 8361993
doi: 10.1111/ele.13783
Razanajatovo, M. et al. Plants capable of selfing are more likely to become naturalized. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–9 (2016). 2016 71.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms13313
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical J. Linn. Soc. 181, 1–20 (2016).
Pandit, M. K., White, S. M. & Pocock, M. J. O. The contrasting effects of genome size, chromosome number and ploidy level on plant invasiveness: a global analysis. New Phytol. 203, 697–703 (2014).
pubmed: 24697788
doi: 10.1111/nph.12799
Dong B. et al. Naturalization of introduced plants is driven by life‐form‐dependent cultivation biases. Divers. Distrib. 30, 55–70 (2023).
Bradley, B. A. et al. Global change, global trade, and the next wave of plant invasions. Front. Ecol. Environ. 10, 20–28 (2012).
doi: 10.1890/110145
Essl, F. et al. Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 108, 203–207 (2011).
pubmed: 21173227
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011728108
Seebens, H. et al. Global trade will accelerate plant invasions in emerging economies under climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 4128–4140 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.13021
Bjorkman, A. D. et al. Tundra Trait Team: A database of plant traits spanning the tundra biome. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 1402–1411 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/geb.12821
Brym, Z. T., Lake, J. K., Allen, D. & Ostling, A. Plant functional traits suggest novel ecological strategy for an invasive shrub in an understorey woody plant community. J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 1098–1106 (2011).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02049.x
Dayrell, R. L. C. et al. Ontogenetic shifts in plant ecological strategies. Funct. Ecol. 32, 2730–2741 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13221
Tavşanoǧlu, Ç. & Pausas, J. G. A functional trait database for Mediterranean Basin plants. Sci. Data 5, 1–18 (2018). 2018 51.
doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.135
Wang, H. et al. The China Plant Trait Database: toward a comprehensive regional compilation of functional traits for land plants. Ecology 99, 500 (2018).
pubmed: 29155446
doi: 10.1002/ecy.2091
Cayuela, L., Granzow-de la Cerda, Í., Albuquerque, F. S. & Golicher, D. J. taxonstand: An r package for species names standardisation in vegetation databases. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 1078–1083 (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00232.x
Pellicer, J. & Leitch, I. J. The Plant DNA C-values database (release 7.1): an updated online repository of plant genome size data for comparative studies. New Phytol. 226, 301–305 (2020).
pubmed: 31608445
doi: 10.1111/nph.16261
Greilhuber, J., Doležel, J., Lysák, M. A. & Bennett, M. D. The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms ‘genome size’ and ‘C-value’ to describe nuclear DNA contents. Ann. Bot. 95, 255–260 (2005).
pubmed: 15596473
pmcid: 4246724
doi: 10.1093/aob/mci019
Diazgranados, M. et al. World Checklist of Useful Plant Species. Knowl. Netw. Biocomplexity https://doi.org/10.5063/F1CV4G34 (2020).
POWO. Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Published on the Internet; http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/ (2023).
Govaerts, R., Nic Lughadha, E., Black, N., Turner, R. & Paton, A. The World Checklist of Vascular Plants, a continuously updated resource for exploring global plant diversity. Sci. Data 8, 215 (2021).
pubmed: 34389730
pmcid: 8363670
doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00997-6
Compositae Working Group. Global Compositae Database. https://www.compositae.org (2023).
GRIN. Germplasm resource information network. https://www.ars-grin.gov/ (2023).
IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. https://www.iucnredlist.org/ (2023).
Richardson, D. M. et al. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib. 6, 93–107 (2000).
doi: 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x
van Kleunen, M. et al. The Global Naturalized Alien Flora (GloNAF) database. Ecology 100, e02542 (2019).
pubmed: 30341991
doi: 10.1002/ecy.2542
CBD. Alien species that threaten ecosystems, habitats or species. https://www.cbd.int/kb/record/decision/7197?RecordType=decisionSubject=IAS (2000).
IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC), Invasive Species Specialist Group. Guidelines for the prevention of biodiversity loss caused by alien invasive species. (2000).
CABI. CABI Compendium. CABI Compendium. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. www.cabi.org/isc (2023).
Global Invasive Species Database. GISD. The Global Invasive Species Database http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/ (2015).
Weber, E. Invasive Plant Species of the World: A Reference Guide to Environmental Weeds (2nd edition) https://doi.org/10.1108/rr-06-2017-0133 (2017).
Smith, S. A. & Brown, J. W. Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny. Am. J. Bot. 105, 302–314 (2018).
pubmed: 29746720
doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1019
Zanne, A. E. et al. Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature 506, 89–92 (2014).
pubmed: 24362564
doi: 10.1038/nature12872
Jin, Y. & Qian, H. V.PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants. Ecography 42, 1353–1359 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/ecog.04434
Yu, G. Data integration, manipulation and visualization of phylogenetic trees. (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2022).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2022).
Paradis, E. & Schliep, K. ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35, 526–528 (2019).
pubmed: 30016406
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633
Bürkner, P. Estimating Phylogenetic Multilevel Models with BRMS. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/brms/vignettes/brms_phylogenetics.html (2021).
Byrnes J. Structural Equation Modeling for Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. https://jebyrnes.github.io/semclass/ (2019).
Guo, K. et al. Plant invasion and naturalization are influenced by genome size, ecology and economic use globally. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10113291 (2023).