Vagus nerve stimulation allows to cease maintenance electroconvulsive therapy in treatment-resistant depression: a retrospective monocentric case series.

drug resistance electric stimulation therapy perception safety treatment outcome

Journal

Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN: 1664-0640
Titre abrégé: Front Psychiatry
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545006

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 02 10 2023
accepted: 11 12 2023
medline: 14 2 2024
pubmed: 14 2 2024
entrez: 14 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The use of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) to reduce or stop electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in treatment-resistant depression seems promising. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of VNS on the reduction of ECT sessions and mood stabilization. We conducted a monocentric retrospective case series of patients who suffered from treatment-resistant depression, treated with ECT and referred to our center for VNS. We investigated the number and the frequency of ECT sessions before and after VNS implantation. Secondary criteria consisted in the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score, number of medical treatments, dosage of the main treatment and length of hospital stays before and after VNS. Additionally, we sent an anonymous survey to psychiatrists and other physicians in our institution to investigate their knowledge and perception of VNS therapy to treat treatment-resistant depression. Seven patients benefited from VNS: six (86%) were female (mean age of 51.7 +/- 16.0 years at surgery), and five (71%) suffered from bipolar depression (three type I and two type II). All patients were followed up at least 2 years post-implantation (range: 27-68 months). Prior to VNS, six patients were treated by maintenance ECT. After VNS, three (43%) patients did not require maintenance ECT anymore, and three (43%) patients required less frequent ECT session with a mean 14.7 +/- 9.8 weeks between sessions after VNS vs. 2.9 +/- 0.8 weeks before VNS. At last follow-up, 4 (57%) patients had stopped ECT. Five (71%) patients implanted with VNS were good responders (50% decrease relative to baseline MADRS). According to the survey, psychiatrists had a significantly better perception and knowledge of ECT, but a worse perception and knowledge of VNS compared to other physicians. VNS is a good option for treatment-resistant depression requiring maintenance ECT dependence. Larger on-going studies will help broaden the implanted patients while strengthening psychiatrists' knowledge on this therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38352166
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1305603
pmc: PMC10861730
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1305603

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Aboubakr, Domenech, Heurtebise, Gaillard, Guy-Rubin, Carron, Duriez, Gorwood, Vinckier, Pallud and Zanello.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

MZ reports a relationship with LivaNova PLC that includes: travel reimbursement. RC reports a relationship with LivaNova PLC that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. PDo reports a relationship with LivaNova PLC that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Oumaima Aboubakr (O)

Department of Neurosurgery, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.
Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Paris, France.

Philippe Domenech (P)

Department of Psychiatry, Service Hospitalo-Universitaire, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.
Institut du Cerveau, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR7225 Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.

Isabelle Heurtebise (I)

Cardiology Department Centre Hospitalier de Bourges, Bourges, France.

Raphaël Gaillard (R)

Department of Psychiatry, Service Hospitalo-Universitaire, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.
Motivation, Brain, and Behavior (MBB) Lab, Paris Brain Institute (ICM) Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.

Aurore Guy-Rubin (A)

Clinique Villa Montsouris, Paris, France.

Romain Carron (R)

Department of Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France.
Aix Marseille Univ, APHM, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Timone Hospital, Epileptology Department, Marseille, France.

Philibert Duriez (P)

CMME Psychiatry Department, GHU PARIS Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.
Laboratoire de Physiopathologie des Maladies Psychiatriques, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris INSERM, Paris, France.

Philip Gorwood (P)

CMME Psychiatry Department, GHU PARIS Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.
Laboratoire de Physiopathologie des Maladies Psychiatriques, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris INSERM, Paris, France.

Fabien Vinckier (F)

Institut du Cerveau, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR7225 Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Cardiology Department Centre Hospitalier de Bourges, Bourges, France.

Johan Pallud (J)

Department of Neurosurgery, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.
Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Paris, France.

Marc Zanello (M)

Department of Neurosurgery, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Site Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.
Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Paris, France.

Classifications MeSH