Low rate of severe-end-stage kidney disease after SABR for localised primary kidney cancer.

Chronic kidney disease End-stage renal disease RCC Renal cell carcinoma SABR Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy

Journal

Radiation oncology (London, England)
ISSN: 1748-717X
Titre abrégé: Radiat Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265111

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 17 12 2023
accepted: 29 01 2024
medline: 15 2 2024
pubmed: 15 2 2024
entrez: 14 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is an emerging treatment for patients with primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, its impact on renal function is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate incidence and clinical factors predictive of severe to end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) after SABR for RCC. This was a Single institutional retrospective analysis of patients with diagnosed primary RCC receiving SABR between 2012-2020. Adult patients with no metastatic disease, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73 m Seventy-eight consecutive patients were included, with median age of 77.8 years (IQR 70-83), tumor size of 4.5 cm (IQR 3.9-5.8) and follow-up of 42.2 months (IQR 23-60). Baseline median eGFR was 58 mls/min; 55% (n = 43) of patients had baseline CKD stage 3 and the remainder stage 1-2. By last follow-up, 1/35 (2.8%) of baseline CKD 1-2, 7/27 (25.9%) CKD 3a and 11/16 (68.8%) CKD 3b had developed CKD stage 4-5. The estimated probability of freedom from CKD stage 4-5 at 1 and 5 years was 89.6% (CI 83.0-97.6) and 65% (CI 51.4-81.7) respectively. On univariable analysis, worse baseline CKD (p < 0.0001) and multi-fraction SABR (p = 0.005) were predictive for development of stage 4-5 CKD though only the former remained significant in multivariable model. In this elderly cohort with pre-existing renal dysfunction, SABR achieved satisfactory nephron sparing with acceptable rates of severe to end-stage CKD. It can be an attractive option in patients who are medically inoperable.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is an emerging treatment for patients with primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, its impact on renal function is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate incidence and clinical factors predictive of severe to end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) after SABR for RCC.
METHODS AND MATERIALS METHODS
This was a Single institutional retrospective analysis of patients with diagnosed primary RCC receiving SABR between 2012-2020. Adult patients with no metastatic disease, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73 m
RESULTS RESULTS
Seventy-eight consecutive patients were included, with median age of 77.8 years (IQR 70-83), tumor size of 4.5 cm (IQR 3.9-5.8) and follow-up of 42.2 months (IQR 23-60). Baseline median eGFR was 58 mls/min; 55% (n = 43) of patients had baseline CKD stage 3 and the remainder stage 1-2. By last follow-up, 1/35 (2.8%) of baseline CKD 1-2, 7/27 (25.9%) CKD 3a and 11/16 (68.8%) CKD 3b had developed CKD stage 4-5. The estimated probability of freedom from CKD stage 4-5 at 1 and 5 years was 89.6% (CI 83.0-97.6) and 65% (CI 51.4-81.7) respectively. On univariable analysis, worse baseline CKD (p < 0.0001) and multi-fraction SABR (p = 0.005) were predictive for development of stage 4-5 CKD though only the former remained significant in multivariable model.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In this elderly cohort with pre-existing renal dysfunction, SABR achieved satisfactory nephron sparing with acceptable rates of severe to end-stage CKD. It can be an attractive option in patients who are medically inoperable.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38355495
doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02413-w
pii: 10.1186/s13014-024-02413-w
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

23

Informations de copyright

© 2024. Crown.

Références

Ali M, Mooi J, Lawrentschuk N, McKay RR, Hannan R, Lo SS, et al. The role of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy in renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2022;82(6):613–22.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.06.017 pubmed: 35843777
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) Kidney Cancer. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/kidney.pdf .
Correa RJM, Louie AV, Zaorsky NG, Lehrer EJ, Ellis R, Ponsky L, et al. The emerging role of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for primary renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5(6):958–69.
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.06.002 pubmed: 31248849
Siva S, Ali M, Correa RJM, Muacevic A, Ponsky L, Ellis RJ, et al. 5-year outcomes after stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for primary renal cell carcinoma: an individual patient data meta-analysis from IROCK (the International Radiosurgery Consortium of the Kidney). Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(12):1508–16.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00656-8 pubmed: 36400098
Swaminath A, Cheung P, Glicksman RM, Donovan EK, Niglas M, Vesprini D, et al. Patient-reported quality of life following stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary kidney cancer—results from a prospective cohort study. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2021;33(7):468–75.
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.03.002 pubmed: 33775496
Bhindi B, Lohse CM, Schulte PJ, Mason RJ, Cheville JC, Boorjian SA, et al. Predicting renal function outcomes after partial and radical nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2019;75(5):766–72.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.021 pubmed: 30477983
Martini A, Cumarasamy S, Beksac AT, Abaza R, Eun DD, Bhandari A, et al. A nomogram to predict significant estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction after robotic partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2018;74(6):833–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.037 pubmed: 30224195
Lane BR, Babineau DC, Poggio ED, Weight CJ, Larson BT, Gill IS, et al. Factors predicting renal functional outcome after partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2008;180(6):2363–8; discussion 8–9.
Mason R, Kapoor A, Liu Z, Saarela O, Tanguay S, Jewett M, et al. The natural history of renal function after surgical management of renal cell carcinoma: results from the Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System. Urol Oncol. 2016;34(11):486.e1-487.e7.
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.05.025 pubmed: 27344410
Lane BR, Babineau DC, Poggio ED, Weight CJ, Larson BT, Gill IS, et al. Factors predicting renal functional outcome after partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2008;180(6):2363–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.036 pubmed: 18930264
Siva S, Chesson B, Bressel M, Pryor D, Higgs B, Reynolds HM, et al. TROG 15.03 phase II clinical trial of Focal Ablative STereotactic Radiosurgery for Cancers of the Kidney—FASTRACK II. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):1030.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4916-2 pubmed: 30352550 pmcid: 6199711
Saad AM, Gad MM, Al-Husseini MJ, Ruhban IA, Sonbol MB, Ho TH. Trends in renal-cell carcinoma incidence and mortality in the united states in the last 2 decades: a SEER-based study. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019;17(1):46-57.e5.
doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.10.002 pubmed: 30391138
Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(13):1296–305.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041031 pubmed: 15385656
Hamilton ZA, Capitanio U, Lane BR, Larcher A, Yim K, Dey S, et al. Should partial nephrectomy be considered “elective” in patients with stage 2 chronic kidney disease? A comparative analysis of functional and survival outcomes after radical and partial nephrectomy. World J Urol. 2019;37(11):2429–37.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02650-9 pubmed: 30710156
Scosyrev E, Messing EM, Sylvester R, Campbell S, Van Poppel H. Renal function after nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy: results from EORTC randomized trial 30904. Eur Urol. 2014;65(2):372–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.044 pubmed: 23850254
Leppert JT, Lamberts RW, Thomas IC, Chung BI, Sonn GA, Skinner EC, et al. Incident CKD after radical or partial nephrectomy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29(1):207–16.
doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017020136 pubmed: 29018140
Sharma P, McCullough K, Scotland G, McNamee P, Prescott G, MacLeod A, et al. Does stage-3 chronic kidney disease matter? A systematic literature review. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60(575):e266–76. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp10X502173 .
doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X502173 pmcid: 2887275
Liu P, Quinn RR, Lam NN, Al-Wahsh H, Sood MM, Tangri N, et al. Progression and regression of chronic kidney disease by age among adults in a population-based cohort in Alberta, Canada. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(6):e2112828-e.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12828
Baek SD, Baek CH, Kim JS, Kim SM, Kim JH, Kim SB. Does stage III chronic kidney disease always progress to end-stage renal disease? A ten-year follow-up study. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012;46(3):232–8.
doi: 10.3109/00365599.2011.649045 pubmed: 22545920
Takagi T, Kondo T, Iizuka J, Kobayashi H, Hashimoto Y, Nakazawa H, et al. Postoperative renal function after partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease: a comparison with radical nephrectomy. Int J Urol. 2011;18(6):472–6.
doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02765.x pubmed: 21481013
Palacios DA, Wilson B, Ascha M, Campbell RA, Song S, DeWitt-Foy ME, et al. New baseline renal function after radical or partial nephrectomy: a simple and accurate predictive model. J Urol. 2021;205(5):1310–20.
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001549
Park JS, Yu JI, Lim DH, Nam H, Kim YI, Lee J, et al. Impact of radiotherapy on kidney function among patients who received adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer: logistic and linear regression analyses. Cancers (Basel). 2020;13(1):59.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13010059 pubmed: 33379195
Ebbing J, Menzel F, Frumento P, Miller K, Ralla B, Fuller TF, et al. Outcome of kidney function after ischaemic and zero-ischaemic laparoscopic and open nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell cancer. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1):40.
doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1215-3 pubmed: 30717692 pmcid: 6362593
Volpe A, Blute ML, Ficarra V, Gill IS, Kutikov A, Porpiglia F, et al. Renal ischemia and function after partial nephrectomy: a collaborative review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2015;68(1):61–74.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.025 pubmed: 25703575
Gong DJ, Wang L, Yang YY, Zhang JJ, Liu XH. Diabetes aggravates renal ischemia and reperfusion injury in rats by exacerbating oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis. Ren Fail. 2019;41(1):750–61.
doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2019.1643737 pubmed: 31441362 pmcid: 6720228
Textor SC, Lerman L. Renovascular hypertension and ischemic nephropathy. Am J Hypertens. 2010;23(11):1159–69.
doi: 10.1038/ajh.2010.174 pubmed: 20864945
Klaus R, Niyazi M, Lange-Sperandio B. Radiation-induced kidney toxicity: molecular and cellular pathogenesis. Radiat Oncol. 2021;16(1):43.
doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01764-y pubmed: 33632272 pmcid: 7905925
Marks LB, Yorke ED, Jackson A, Ten Haken RK, Constine LS, Eisbruch A, et al. Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3 Suppl):S10–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1754 pubmed: 20171502 pmcid: 4041542
Siva S, Jackson P, Kron T, Bressel M, Lau E, Hofman M, et al. Impact of stereotactic radiotherapy on kidney function in primary renal cell carcinoma: establishing a dose-response relationship. Radiother Oncol. 2016;118(3):540–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.01.027 pubmed: 26873790
Yamamoto T, Kadoya N, Takeda K, Matsushita H, Umezawa R, Sato K, et al. Renal atrophy after stereotactic body radiotherapy for renal cell carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2016;11:72.
doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0651-5 pubmed: 27229710 pmcid: 4881181

Auteurs

Muhammad Ali (M)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. muhammad.ali@petermac.org.
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. muhammad.ali@petermac.org.

Kendrick Koo (K)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

David Chang (D)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Phil Chan (P)

Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

Sheng F Oon (SF)

Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

Daniel Moon (D)

Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

Declan G Murphy (DG)

Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

Renu Eapen (R)

Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

Jeremy Goad (J)

Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Nathan Lawrentschuk (N)

Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Arun A Azad (AA)

Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

Sarat Chander (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Mark Shaw (M)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

Nicholas Hardcastle (N)

Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

Shankar Siva (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Classifications MeSH