Translation, reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Norwich Patellar Instability score and The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0.
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Feb 2024
14 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
04
01
2024
accepted:
01
02
2024
medline:
15
2
2024
pubmed:
15
2
2024
entrez:
14
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Current treatment options for patellofemoral (PF) instability have required functional scoring systems. The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 and Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) scores were explicitly created to meet the need to evaluate PF instability. Different patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are used to evaluate anterior knee problems. To test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and NPI score. Fifty-one patients that operated for PF instability, older than eighteen years old, were included in this study. Turkish translation of the BPII 2.0 and NPI scores was undertaken through translation into Turkish by an independent translator. Two tests were repeated seven days apart. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for test-retest reliability. Internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha. Validity was assessed by correlating the Kujala and Lysholm knee scores. Fifty-one patients (34 females/17 males), the average age was 25 ± 7, were included in this study. Cronbach's alpha value was 0.829 for BPII 2.0 and 0.843 for NPI for the first time answered by patients. ICC values applied to evaluate test-retest reliability were 0.904 (p < 0.05) for BPII 2.0 and 0.915 (p < 0.05) for NPI. There was a moderate correlation between the BPII 2.0 Turkish version and the Kujala score. There was a very high correlation between the Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and Lysholm knee scores. An excellent negative correlation was found between Norwich and Kujala scores (r = -0.819, p < 0.05). The correlation coefficient between Norwich and Lysholm scores was -0.662, indicating a high negative correlation (p < 0.05). The correlation coefficients between the Turkish version of BPII 2.0 and NPI were -0.533 (p < 0.05). The Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and NPI score is a reliable and valid instrument for Turkish-speaking patients with patellofemoral instability.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Current treatment options for patellofemoral (PF) instability have required functional scoring systems. The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 and Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) scores were explicitly created to meet the need to evaluate PF instability. Different patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are used to evaluate anterior knee problems.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and NPI score.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
METHODS
Fifty-one patients that operated for PF instability, older than eighteen years old, were included in this study. Turkish translation of the BPII 2.0 and NPI scores was undertaken through translation into Turkish by an independent translator. Two tests were repeated seven days apart. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for test-retest reliability. Internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha. Validity was assessed by correlating the Kujala and Lysholm knee scores.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Fifty-one patients (34 females/17 males), the average age was 25 ± 7, were included in this study. Cronbach's alpha value was 0.829 for BPII 2.0 and 0.843 for NPI for the first time answered by patients. ICC values applied to evaluate test-retest reliability were 0.904 (p < 0.05) for BPII 2.0 and 0.915 (p < 0.05) for NPI. There was a moderate correlation between the BPII 2.0 Turkish version and the Kujala score. There was a very high correlation between the Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and Lysholm knee scores. An excellent negative correlation was found between Norwich and Kujala scores (r = -0.819, p < 0.05). The correlation coefficient between Norwich and Lysholm scores was -0.662, indicating a high negative correlation (p < 0.05). The correlation coefficients between the Turkish version of BPII 2.0 and NPI were -0.533 (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and NPI score is a reliable and valid instrument for Turkish-speaking patients with patellofemoral instability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38355539
doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04612-3
pii: 10.1186/s13018-024-04612-3
doi:
Types de publication
Letter
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
140Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Liebensteiner M, et al. Conservative versus tailored surgical treatment in patients with first time lateral patella dislocation: a randomized-controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):1–8.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02513-3
Pruneski J, et al. Changes in anatomic risk factors for patellar instability during skeletal growth and maturation. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(9):2424–32.
doi: 10.1177/03635465221102917
pubmed: 35763558
Sanchis-Alfonso V, Montesinos-Berry E. Is lateral retinacular release still a valid surgical option? From release to lengthening. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3(19):301.
pubmed: 26697461
pmcid: 4671865
Steiner TM, Torga-Spak R, Teitge RA. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in patients with lateral patellar instability and trochlear dysplasia. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(8):1254–61.
doi: 10.1177/0363546505285584
pubmed: 16567459
Nomura E, Inoue M. Hybrid medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using the semitendinous tendon for recurrent patellar dislocation: minimum 3 years’ follow-up. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2006;22(7):787–93.
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.078
Von Knoch F, et al. Trochleaplasty for recurrent patellar dislocation in association with trochlear dysplasia: a 4-to 14-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(10):1331–5.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B10.17834
Dennis ER, Marmor WA, Stein BES. Combined MPFL reconstruction with tibial tubercle osteotomy and repair of patellar cartilage defect with particulated juvenile articular cartilage. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2022;12(4):e21.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00013
pmcid: 9889293
Hiemstra LA, Page JL, Kerslake S. Patient-reported outcome measures for patellofemoral instability: a critical review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019;12:124–37.
doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09537-7
pubmed: 30835079
pmcid: 6542883
Barroso Rosa S, Grant A, McEwen P. Patient-reported outcome measures for patellofemoral disorders: a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143(7):3919–27.
doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04663-3
pubmed: 36260119
Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10(3):150–4.
doi: 10.1177/036354658201000306
pubmed: 6896798
Kujala UM, et al. Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 1993;9(2):159–63.
doi: 10.1016/S0749-8063(05)80366-4
Fulkerson JP, et al. Anteromedial tibial tubercle transfer without bone graft. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18(5):490–7.
doi: 10.1177/036354659001800508
pubmed: 2252090
Irrgang JJ, et al. Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(5):600–13.
doi: 10.1177/03635465010290051301
pubmed: 11573919
Kuru T, Dereli EE, Yaliman A. Validity of the Turkish version of the Kujala patellofemoral score in patellofemoral pain syndrome. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010;44(2):152–6.
doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2010.2252
pubmed: 20676018
Celik D, Coskunsu D, Kiliçoglu Ö. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Turkish Lysholm knee scale: ease of use, validity, and reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(8):2602–10.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3046-z
pubmed: 23666590
pmcid: 3705057
Smith TO, et al. The development, validation and internal consistency of the Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) score. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:324–35.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2359-x
pubmed: 23306714
Hiemstra LA, et al. Initial validity and reliability of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(7):1629–35.
doi: 10.1177/0363546513487981
pubmed: 23649006
Lafave MR, Hiemstra L, Kerslake S. Factor analysis and item reduction of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) Introduction of BPII 2.0. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(8):2081–6.
doi: 10.1177/0363546516644605
pubmed: 27166290
Becher C, et al. Successful adaption of the Banff patella instability instrument (BPII) 2.0 into German. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:2679–84.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4673-9
pubmed: 28785790
Galvão PHSAF, et al. Portuguese Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaption of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia. 2022;56:747–60.
Van Sambeeck JD, Van De Groes SA, Koëter S. Dutch translation and validation of the Norwich Patellar Instability score and Banff Patella Instability Instrument in patients after surgery for patellar instability. Acta Orthop Belg. 2020;86(3):470–81.
pubmed: 33581032
Rhatomy S, et al. The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument: validity and reliability of an Indonesian version. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023;33(3):617–22.
doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03336-6
pubmed: 35931873
Hysing-Dahl T, et al. Cross-cultural Validation of the NorwegianVersion of the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2023;11(5):23259671231168880.
doi: 10.1177/23259671231168881
pubmed: 37346778
pmcid: 10280527
Von Heideken J, et al. Adaptation of the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 into Swedish. Acta Orthopaedica. 2023;94:537.
doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.21194
Arrebola LS, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwich Patellar Instability score for use in Brazilian Portuguese. Sao Paulo Med J. 2019;137:148–54.
doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0393280119
pubmed: 31314875
pmcid: 9721228
Huang H, et al. Reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Lysholm Score and Tegner Activity Scale for knee arthroplasty. J Rehabil Med. 2022;54:jrm00317.
doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.2304
pubmed: 35583050
Wild D, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
pubmed: 15804318
Turhan E, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017;51(1):60–4.
doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.06.012
pubmed: 27956082
Irrgang JJ, Marx RG. Clinical outcomes in sport and exercise physical therapies. Physical therapies in sports and exercise. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2007. p. 206–19.
Terwee CB, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
pubmed: 17161752
Smith T, et al. The Norwich Patellar Instability Score: validity, internal consistency and responsiveness for people conservatively-managed following first-time patellar dislocation. Knee. 2016;23(2):256–60.
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.10.003
pubmed: 26794922
Hiemstra LA, et al. Concurrent validation of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument to the Norwich Patellar Instability Score and the Kujala Score in patients with patellofemoral instability. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4(5):2325967116646085.
pubmed: 27231700
pmcid: 4871207