Which model is more efficient in carbon emission prediction research? A comparative study of deep learning models, machine learning models, and econometric models.
Carbon emission
Comparative analysis
Deep learning
Econometric model
Heuristic neural network
STIRPAT
Journal
Environmental science and pollution research international
ISSN: 1614-7499
Titre abrégé: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9441769
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Feb 2024
15 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
27
09
2023
accepted:
15
01
2024
medline:
15
2
2024
pubmed:
15
2
2024
entrez:
14
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Accurately predicting future carbon emissions is of great significance for the government to scientifically promote carbon emission reduction policies. Among the current technologies for forecasting carbon emissions, the most prominent ones are econometric models and deep learning, but few works have systematically compared and analyzed the forecasting performance of the methods. Therefore, the paper makes a comparison for deep learning model, machine learning model, and the econometric model to demonstrate whether deep learning is an efficient method for carbon emission prediction research. In model mechanism, neural network for deep learning refers to an information processing model established by simulating biological neural system, and the model can be further extended through bionic characteristics. So the paper further optimizes the model from the perspective of bionics and proposes an innovative deep learning model based on the memory behavior mechanism of group creatures. Comparison results show that the prediction accuracy of the heuristic neural network is higher than that of the econometric model. Through in-depth analysis, the heuristic neural network is more suitable for predicting future carbon emissions, while the econometric model is more suitable for clarifying the impact of influencing factors on carbon emissions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38355857
doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32083-w
pii: 10.1007/s11356-024-32083-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Ang BW (2004) Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? Energy Policy 32:1131–1139
doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00076-4
Applegate MC, Aronov D (2022) Flexible use of memory by food-caching birds. Elife 11
Bednekoff PA (1997) Mutualism among safe, selfish sentinels: a dynamic game. Am Nat 150:373–392
doi: 10.1086/286070
pubmed: 18811295
Chai ZY, Yan YB, Simayi Z, Yang ST, Abulimiti M, Wang YQ (2022) Carbon emissions index decomposition and carbon emissions prediction in Xinjiang from the perspective of population-related factors, based on the combination of STIRPAT model and neural network. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:31781–31796
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17976-4
Dai DW, Li KX, Zhao SH, Zhou B (2022) Research on prediction and realization path of carbon peak of construction industry based on EGM-BP model. Front Energy Res 10:981097
doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.981097
Dietz T, Rosa EA (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Hum Ecol Rev 1:277–300
Dong J, Zong M, Chen J (2014) A method to predict the carbon emissions of civil aviation based on STIRPAT model. Environ Eng 32:165–169
Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science 171:1212–1217
doi: 10.1126/science.171.3977.1212
pubmed: 5545198
Fan D, Huang Y, Pu Y, Yang W (2017) CO_2 emission from fossil energy consumption in Chongqing and prediction of its peak. Journal of Southwest University. Nat Sci Ed 39:179–186
Gaur L, Afaq A, Arora GK, Khan N (2023) Artificial intelligence for carbon emissions using system of systems theory. Ecol Inform:102165
Gers FA, Schraudolph NN, Schmidhuber J (2003) Learning precise timing with LSTM recurrent networks. J Mach Learn Res 3:115–143
Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9:1735–1780
doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
pubmed: 9377276
Jimenez JJM, Stokes L, Moss C, Yang QP, Livina VN (2020) Modelling energy demand response using long short-term memory neural networks. Energy Effic 13:1263–1280
doi: 10.1007/s12053-020-09879-z
Jin H (2021) Prediction of direct carbon emissions of Chinese provinces using artificial neural networks. PLoS One 16
Lai Y, Papadopoulos S, Fuerst F, Pivo G, Sagi J, Kontokosta CE (2022) Building retrofit hurdle rates and risk aversion in energy efficiency investments. Appl Energy 306
Li W, Du L (2019) Assessment framework of provincial carbon emission peak prediction in China: an empirical analysis of Hebei province. Pol J Environ Stud 28:3753–3765
doi: 10.15244/pjoes/99302
Li W, Gao SB (2018) Prospective on energy related carbon emissions peak integrating optimized intelligent algorithm with dry process technique application for China’s cement industry. Energy 165:33–54
doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.152
Li Y (2019) Prediction of energy consumption: variable regression or time series? A case in China. Energy Sci Eng 7:2510–2518
doi: 10.1002/ese3.439
Li Y, Chen M (2021) Analysis of influencing factors and peak forecast of non-CO_2 greenhouse gas emissions from provincial agricultural sources in China. Acta Sci Circumst 41:5174–5189
Lu C, Li W, Gao SB (2020) Driving determinants and prospective prediction simulations on carbon emissions peak for China’s heavy chemical industry. J Clean Prod 251
Marquaridt DW (1970) Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation, and nonlinear estimation. Technometrics 12:591–612
doi: 10.1080/00401706.1970.10488699
Niu DX, Wang KK, Wu J, Sun LJ, Liang Y, Xu XM, Yang XL (2020) Can China achieve its 2030 carbon emissions commitment? Scenario analysis based on an improved general regression neural network. J Clean Prod 243
Pao HT, Tsai CM (2011) Modeling and forecasting the CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in Brazil. Energy 36:2450–2458
doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.01.032
Pu XF, Yao J, Zheng RY (2022) Forecast of energy consumption and carbon emissions in China’s building sector to 2060. Energies 15
Qu S, Guo C (2010) Forecast of China’s carbon emissions based on STIRPAT model. China Popul·Resourc Environ 20:10–15
Ran J, Su Y, Hu J, Tang H, Wang J, Cui P (2017) Temporal and spatial characteristics, peak value forecast and influencing factors of agricultural carbon emissions in Xinjiang. J China Agric Resourc Regional Plann 38:16–24
Ren F, Long DH (2021) Carbon emission forecasting and scenario analysis in Guangdong Province based on optimized fast learning network. J Clean Prod 317
Shaw RC, Harvey A (2020) Long-term memory for a learned behaviour in a wild bird. Biol Lett 16
Shi C, Zhi J, Yao X, Zhang H, Yu Y, Zeng Q, Li L, Zhang Y (2023) How can China achieve the 2030 carbon peak goal—a crossover analysis based on low-carbon economics and deep learning. Energy 269:126776
doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.126776
Stacho M, Herold C, Rook N, Wagner H, Axer M, Amunts K, Gunturkun O (2020) A cortex-like canonical circuit in the avian forebrain. Science 369:1585-+
doi: 10.1126/science.abc5534
Wang CH, Zhao MZ, Gong WF, Fan ZY, Li WW (2021) Regional heterogeneity of carbon emissions and peaking path of carbon emissions in the Bohai Rim Region. J Math
Wang D, He W, Shi R (2019) How to achieve the dual-control targets of China’s CO2 emission reduction in 2030? Future trends and prospective decomposition. J Clean Prod 213:1251–1263
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.178
Wang JJ, Cheng Q, Sun X (2022) Carbon price forecasting using multiscale nonlinear integration model coupled optimal feature reconstruction with biphasic deep learning. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:85988–86004
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16089-2
Wang P, Wu WS, Zhu BZ, Wei YM (2013) Examining the impact factors of energy-related CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model in Guangdong Province, China. Appl Energy 106:65–71
doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.01.036
Wen L, Shao HY (2019) Analysis of influencing factors of the carbon dioxide emissions in China’s commercial department based on the STIRPAT model and ridge regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:27138–27147
doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05929-x
Wu WQ, Ma X, Zhang YY, Li WP, Wang Y (2020) A novel conformable fractional non-homogeneous grey model for forecasting carbon dioxide emissions of BRICS countries. Sci Total Environ 707
Xu GY, Schwarz P, Yang HL (2019) Determining China’s CO2 emissions peak with a dynamic nonlinear artificial neural network approach and scenario analysis. Energy Policy 128:752–762
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.058
Xue J, Shen B (2020) A novel swarm intelligence optimization approach: sparrow search algorithm. Syst Sci Control Eng 8:22–34
doi: 10.1080/21642583.2019.1708830
Zhang C, Wang Y, Xu J, Shi C (2023) What factors drive the temporal-spatial differences of electricity consumption in the Yangtze River Delta region of China. Environ Impact Assess Rev 103:107247
doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107247
Zhang F, Wen N (2022) Carbon price forecasting: a novel deep learning approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:54782–54795
doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19713-x
Zhang LH, Ge RLT, Chai JX (2019) Prediction of China’s energy consumption based on robust principal component analysis and PSO-LSSVM optimized by the Tabu search algorithm. Energies 12
Zhang XW, Cao WJ (2017) Research on influence factors of carbon emission based on STIRPAT Model in Jilin Province, International Conference on Social Science, Public Health and Education (SSPHE). Advances in Social Science Education and Humanities Research, Guangzhou, PEOPLES R CHINA, pp 37–42