Machine learning identifies esophageal luminal temperature patterns associated with thermal injury in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

atrial fibrillation catheter ablation endoscopically detected esophageal lesion multisensor probe

Journal

Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
ISSN: 1540-8167
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010756

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Feb 2024
Historique:
revised: 25 01 2024
received: 07 11 2023
accepted: 31 01 2024
medline: 15 2 2024
pubmed: 15 2 2024
entrez: 15 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is widely used to reduce the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal lesion (EDEL). We sought to assess whether specific patterns of LET variation are associated with EDEL. A high-fidelity multisensor probe was used to record LET in AF patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cryoballoon ablation (CBA). Explainable machine learning and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis were used to predict EDEL and assess feature importance. A total of 94 patients (38.3% persistent AF, 71.3% male, 72 RFA, and 22 CBA) were included. EDEL was detected in 11 patients (10 RFA and one CBA). In the RFA group, the highest LET recorded was similar between patients with and without EDEL (40.6 [40.1-41]°C vs. 40.2 [39.1-40.9]°C; p = .313), however, the rate of LET rise for the highest recorded peak was higher (0.08 [0.03-0.12]°C/s vs. 0.02 [0.01-0.05]°C/s; p = .033), and the area under the curve (AUC) for the highest peak was smaller (412.5 [206.8-634.1] vs. 588.6 [380.4-861.1]; p = .047) in patients who had EDEL. In case of CBA, the patient with EDEL had a faster LET decline (0.12 vs. 0.07 [0.02-0.14]°C/s), and a smaller AUC for the lowest trough (2491.3 vs. 2629.3 [1712.6-5283.2]). SHAP analysis revealed that a rate of LET change higher than 0.05°C/s and an AUC less than 600 were more predictive of EDEL in RFA. The rate of LET change and AUC for the recorded temperature predicted EDEL, whereas absolute peak temperatures did not.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38355929
doi: 10.1111/jce.16213
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Yarlagadda B, Deneke T, Turagam M, et al. Temporal relationships between esophageal injury type and progression in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16(2):204-212. doi:10.1016/J.HRTHM.2018.09.027
Mujović N, Marinković M, Lenarczyk R, Tilz R, Potpara TS. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: an overview for clinicians. Adv Ther. 2017;34(8):1897-1917. doi:10.1007/S12325-017-0590-Z
Zellerhoff S, Ullerich H, Lenze F, et al. Damage to the esophagus after atrial fibrillation ablation: just the tip of the iceberg? High prevalence of mediastinal changes diagnosed by endosonography. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(2):155-159. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.109.915918
Halm U, Gaspar T, Zachäus M, et al. Thermal esophageal lesions after radiofrequency catheter ablation of left atrial arrhythmias. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(3):551-556. doi:10.1038/ajg.2009.625
Halbfass P, Berkovitz A, Pavlov B, et al. Incidence of acute thermal esophageal injury after atrial fibrillation ablation guided by prespecified ablation index. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(11):2256-2261. doi:10.1111/JCE.14193
Miyazaki S, Nakamura H, Taniguchi H, et al. Esophagus-related complications during second-generation cryoballoon ablation-insight from simultaneous esophageal temperature monitoring from 2 esophageal probes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(9):1038-1044. doi:10.1111/JCE.13015
Neven K, Schmidt B, Metzner A, et al. Fatal end of a safety algorithm for pulmonary vein isolation with use of high-intensity focused ultrasound. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(3):260-265. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.109.922930
Ghia KK, Chugh A, Good E, et al. A nationwide survey on the prevalence of atrioesophageal fistula after left atrial radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009;24(1):33-36. doi:10.1007/s10840-008-9307-1
Kadado AJ, Akar JG, Hummel JP. Luminal esophageal temperature monitoring to reduce esophageal thermal injury during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a review. Trends Cardiovascul Med. 2019;29(5):264-271. doi:10.1016/J.TCM.2018.09.010
Tschabrunn CM, Silverstein J, Berzin T, et al. Comparison between single- and multi-sensor oesophageal temperature probes during atrial fibrillation ablation: thermodynamic characteristics. Europace. 2015;17(6):891-897. doi:10.1093/EUROPACE/EUU356
Knecht S, Sticherling C, Reichlin T, et al. Reliability of luminal oesophageal temperature monitoring during radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: insights from probe visualization and oesophageal reconstruction using magnetic resonance imaging. Europace. 2016;19(7):euw129. doi:10.1093/EUROPACE/EUW129
Di Biase L, Saenz LC, Burkhardt DJ, et al. Esophageal capsule endoscopy after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: documented higher risk of luminal esophageal damage with general anesthesia as compared with conscious sedation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2(2):108-112. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.108.815266
Abdulsalam NM, Sridhar AM, Tregoning DM, et al. Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring using a multi-sensor probe lowers the risk of esophageal injury in cryo and radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023;66:1-9. doi:10.1007/S10840-023-01492-1/METRICS
Chahine Y, Afroze T, Bifulco SF, et al. Cryoballoon temperature parameters during cryoballoon ablation predict pulmonary vein reconnection and atrial fibrillation recurrence. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022;66(0123456789):1367-1373. doi:10.1007/s10840-022-01429-0
Lakkireddy D. Intraluminal esophageal temperature monitoring using the CircaS-Cath™ temperature probe to guide left atrial ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Atr Fibrillation. 2020;13(4):2386. doi:10.4022/JAFIB.2386
Grosse Meininghaus D, Freund R, Kleemann T, Christoph Geller J. Calculated parameters of luminal esophageal temperatures predict esophageal injury following conventional and high-power short-duration radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022;33(6):1167-1176. doi:10.1111/jce.15509
Tschabrunn CM, Attalla S, Salas J, et al. Active esophageal cooling for the prevention of thermal injury during atrial fibrillation ablation: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022;63(1):197-205.
Lundberg SM, Lee SI. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2017;2017:4766-4775. doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.07874
Singh SM, d'Avila A, Doshi SK, et al. Esophageal injury and temperature monitoring during atrial fibrillation ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008;1(3):162-168. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.108.789552
Fürnkranz A, Bordignon S, Böhmig M, et al. Reduced incidence of esophageal lesions by luminal esophageal temperature-guided second-generation cryoballoon ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(2):268-274. doi:10.1016/J.HRTHM.2014.10.033
Ha FJ, Han HC, Sanders P, et al. Prevalence and prevention of oesophageal injury during atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EP Europace. 2019;21(1):80-90. doi:10.1093/EUROPACE/EUY121
Carroll BJ, Contreras-Valdes FM, Heist EK, et al. Multi-sensor esophageal temperature probe used during radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation is associated with increased intraluminal temperature detection and increased risk of esophageal injury compared to single-sensor probe. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24(9):958-964. doi:10.1111/JCE.12180
Kuwahara T, Takahashi A, Takahashi Y, et al. Incidences of esophageal injury during esophageal temperature monitoring: a comparative study of a multi-thermocouple temperature probe and a deflectable temperature probe in atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014;39(3):251-257. doi:10.1007/s10840-013-9868-5
Sause A, Tutdibi O, Pomsel K, et al. Limiting esophageal temperature in radiofrequency ablation of left atrial tachyarrhythmias results in low incidence of thermal esophageal lesions. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2010;10:52. doi:10.1186/1471-2261-10-52
Fürnkranz A, Bordignon S, Schmidt B, et al. Luminal esophageal temperature predicts esophageal lesions after second-generation cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(6):789-793. doi:10.1016/J.HRTHM.2013.02.021
Ahmed H, Neuzil P, d'Avila A, et al. The esophageal effects of cryoenergy during cryoablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(7):962-969. doi:10.1016/J.HRTHM.2009.03.051
Metzner A, Burchard A, Wohlmuth P, et al. Increased incidence of esophageal thermal lesions using the second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(4):769-775. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000228
Schoene K, Arya A, Grashoff F, et al. Oesophageal probe evaluation in radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation (OPERA): results from a prospective randomized trial. EP Europace. 2020;22(10):1487-1494. doi:10.1093/EUROPACE/EUAA209
Grubina R, Cha YM, Bell MR, Sinak LJ, Asirvatham SJ. Pneumopericardium following radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: insights into the natural history of atrial esophageal fistula formation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(9):1046-1049. doi:10.1111/J.1540-8167.2010.01740.X

Auteurs

Yaacoub Chahine (Y)

Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Tanzina Afroze (T)

Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Savannah F Bifulco (SF)

Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Demyan V Tekmenzhi (DV)

Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Mahbod Jafarvand (M)

Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Patrick M Boyle (PM)

Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Center for Cardiovascular Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Nazem Akoum (N)

Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Classifications MeSH