Ostomy continence devices: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.
colostomy
meta-analysis
ostomy continence devices
systematic review
Journal
Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
ISSN: 1463-1318
Titre abrégé: Colorectal Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883611
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Feb 2024
15 Feb 2024
Historique:
revised:
11
01
2024
received:
03
11
2023
accepted:
14
01
2024
medline:
15
2
2024
pubmed:
15
2
2024
entrez:
15
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Colostomy complication rates range widely from 10% to 70%. The psychological burden on patients, leading to lifestyle changes and decreased quality of life (QoL), is one of the largest factors. The aim of this work was to assess the history and efficacy of ostomy continence devices in improving continence and QoL. In this PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and clinicaltrials.gov for studies on continence devices for all ostomies up to April 2023. Primary outcomes were continence and improvement in QoL. Secondary outcomes were leakage, patient's device preference and complications. Risk of Bias 2 and the revised tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-1) were used to assess risk of bias. Certainty of evidence was graded using GRADE. Twenty-two studies assessed devices from 1978 to 2022. The two main types identified were ball-valve devices and plug systems. Conseal and Vitala were the two main devices with significant evidence allowing for pooled analyses. Conseal, the only currently marketed device, had a pooled rate of continence of 67.4%, QoL improvement was 74.9%, patient preference over a traditional appliance was 69.1%, leakage was 10.1% and complications was 13.7%. Since 2011, five studies have investigated experimental devices on both human and animal models. Ostomy continence has been a long-standing goal without a consistently reliable solution. We propose that selective and short-term usage of continence devices may lead to improved continence and QoL in ostomy patients. Further research is needed to develop a reliable daily device for ostomy continence. Future investigation should include the needs of ileostomates.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
Références
Ambe PC, Kurz NR, Nitschke C, Odeh SF, Möslein G, Zirngibl H. Intestinal ostomy. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018;115:182-187. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2018.0182
Ayaz-Alkaya S. Overview of psychosocial problems in individuals with stoma: a review of literature. Int Wound J. 2019;16:243-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13018
Gleba J, Miller LR, Peck BM, Burgess-Stocks J. United Ostomy Associations of America's Ostomy and Continent Diversion Patient Bill of Rights: an examination of best-in-practice care for ostomy patients. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022;49:462-468. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000909
Sheetz KH, Waits SA, Krell RW, Morris AM, Englesbe MJ, Mullard A, et al. Complication rates of ostomy surgery are high and vary signifcantly between hospitals. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:632-637.
Krishnamurty DM, Blatnik J, Mutch M. Stoma complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017;30:193-200.
Shabbir J, Britton DC. Stoma complications: a literature overview. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:958-964.
Robertson I, Leung E, Hughes D, Spiers M, Donnelly L, Mackenzie I, et al. Prospective analysis of stoma related complications. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:279-285.
Pearson R, Knight SR, Ng JCK, Robertson I, McKenzie C, Macdonald AM. Stoma-related complications following ostomy surgery in 3 acute care hospitals. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2020;47:32-38.
Babakhanlou R, Larkin K, Hita AG, Stroh J, Yeung SC. Stoma-related complications and emergencies. Int J Emerg Med. 2022;15:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-022-00421-9
Davis JS, Svavarsdóttir MH, Pudlo M, Arena R, Lee Y, Jensen MK. Factors impairing quality of life for people with an ostomy. Gastrointest Nurs. 2011;9:14-18.
Aboulian A. Ostomy complications in Crohn's disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019;32:314-322.
Metcalf C. Managing moisture-associated skin damage in stoma care. Br J Nurs. 2018;27:6-14.
Arumugam PJ, Bevan L, Macdonald L, Watkins AJ, Morgan AR, Beynon J, et al. A prospective audit of stomas-analysis of risk factors and complications and their management. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5:49-52.
Kock NG. Intra-abdominal “reservoir” in patients with permanent ileostomy. Preliminary observations on a procedure resulting in fecal “continence” in five ileostomy patients. Arch Surg. 1969;99:223-231. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1969.01340140095014
Nessar G, Wu JS. Evolution of continent ileostomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:3479-3482. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3479
Maxwell TR, Taylor D, Durnal AM, Wills R, Kommala D, Wade S. Safety and efficacy of a novel continence device in colostomy patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1422-1431. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181e5e0c4
Wulff HB. Erfahrungen mit einem Ventilcolostomieverschluss [Experiences with a valvular colostomy plug]. Chirurgie. 1953;24:485-487.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.
Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:401-406.
Heiblum M, Cordoba A. An artificial sphincter: a preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum. 1978;21:562-566. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02586397
Pemberton JH, van Heerden JA, Beart RW Jr, Kelly KA, Phillips SF, Taylor BM. A continent ileostomy device. Ann Surg. 1983;197:618-626. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198305000-00016
Hadidi AT. An external device for faecal incontinence. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2006;16:109-114. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-923994
Goligher JC, Lee PW, McMahon MJ, Pollard M. The Erlangen magnetic colostomy control device: technique of use and results in 22 patients. Br J Surg. 1977;64:501-507. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800640715
Burcharth F, Ballan A, Kylberg F, Rasmussen SN. The colostomy plug: a new disposable device for a continent colostomy. Lancet. 1986;2:1062-1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90466-6
Down G, Leaper D. The Conseal continent colostomy appliance: Southmead Hospital experience. Bristol Med Chir J. 1989;104:59-60.
Clague MB, Heald RJ. Achievement of stomal continence in one-third of colostomies by use of a new disposable plug. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990;170:390-394. PMID: 2183370.
Cerdán FJ, Díez M, Campo J, Barbero MA, Balibrea J. Continent colostomy by means of a new one-piece disposable device. Preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34:886-890. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049702
Cesaretti IU, Santos VL, Vianna LA. Qualidade de vida de pessoas colostomizadas com e sem uso de métodos de controle intestinal [Quality of life of the colostomized person with or without use of methods of bowel control]. Rev Bras Enferm. 2010;63:16-21. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-71672010000100003
Soliani P, Carbognani P, Piccolo P, Sabbagh R, Cudazzo E. Colostomy plug devices: a possible new approach to the problem of incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35:969-974. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02253500
Waever E, Bülow S, Moesgaard FA. Kolostomiprop (Conseal systemet). Vurdering af tidlig postoperativ anvendelse [A colostomy plug (the Conseal system). Assessment of early postoperative use]. Ugeskr Laeger. 1993;155:797-799. Danish.
Codina Cazador A, Piñol M, Marti Rague J, Montane J, Nogueras FM, Suñol J. Multicentre study of a continent colostomy plug. Br J Surg. 1993;80:930-932. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800800748
Picón Pérez G, Calpena Rico R, Candela Polo F, Compañ Rosique A, García García S, Meroño Carbajosa E, et al. Manejo de las colostomías mediante obturador: aspectos clínicos y evaluación de los pacientes [Management of colostomies with plug: clinical aspects and patient evaluation]. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1994;85:95-98. Spanish.
Swan E. Colostomy, management and quality of life for the patient. Br J Nurs. 2011;20(22):24-28. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2011.20.Sup11.S22
Hoch J, Yang M, Yan S, van den Broek N, Xie J, Warusavitarne J. A health-related quality-of-life study comparing Vitala continence control device versus traditional pouch system only in patients with end colostomy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25:739-747. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835d5f3c
Durnal AM, Maxwell TR, Kiran RP, Kommala D. International study of a continence device with 12-hour wear times. Br J Nurs. 2011;20:S4-6-S8-11. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2011.20.Sup9.S4
Strigård K, Oresland T, Rutegård J, Gunnarsson U. Transcutaneous implant evacuation system: a new approach to continent stoma construction. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:e379-e782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02739.x
Lehur PA, Deguines JB, Montagliani L, Duffas JP, Bresler L, Mauvais F, et al. Innovative appliance for colostomy patients: an interventional prospective pilot study. Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23:853-859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02059-x
Zhang Q-a, Huang Z-h, Shi F-j, Chen F, Li J-g, Zou Z-w. Occlusion effect comparison of artificial silicone rubber closure devices with different diameters. Chin J Tissue Eng Res. 2012;16:1496-1500.
Chen F, Li ZC, Li Q, Liang FX, Guo XB, Huang ZH. A novel, intelligent, pressure-sensing colostomy plug for reducing fecal leakage. Artif Organs. 2015;39:514-519. https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.12412
Johansson ML, Hultén L, Jonsson O, Ben Amara H, Thomsen P, Edwin B. Achieving stomal continence with an ileal pouch and a percutaneous implant. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2022;33:7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-021-06633-4
Hubbard G, Taylor C, Beeken B, Campbell A, Gracey J, Grimmett C, et al. Research priorities about stoma-related quality of life from the perspective of people with a stoma: a pilot survey. Health Expect. 2017;20:1421-1427. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12585
Claessens I, Probert R, Tielemans C. The Ostomy Life Study the everyday challenges faced by people living with a stoma in a snapshot. Gastrointest Nurs. 2015;13:18-25. https://doi.org/10.12968/gasn.2015.13.5.18
Hedegaard C, Ajslev T, Zeeberg R, Hansen A. Leakage and peristomal skin complications influences user comfort and confidence and are associated with reduced quality of life in people with a stoma. World Counc Enteros Ther J. 2020;40:23-29. https://doi.org/10.33235/wcet.40.4.23-29
Jeppesen PB, Vestergaard M, Boisen EB, Ajslev TA. Impact of stoma leakage in everyday life: data from the Ostomy Life Study 2019. Br J Nurs. 2022;31:S48-S58. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2022.31.6.S48
Steinhagen E, Colwell J, Cannon LM. Intestinal stomas-postoperative stoma care and peristomal skin complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017;30:184-192.