A trans-Canadian positive deviance seminar for paraesophageal hernia surgery: Reporting national postoperative outcomes and consensus recommendations.
adverse events
hospital stay
laparoscopic
paraesophageal hernia
positive deviance
Journal
World journal of surgery
ISSN: 1432-2323
Titre abrégé: World J Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7704052
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Feb 2024
15 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
01
11
2023
accepted:
06
01
2024
medline:
15
2
2024
pubmed:
15
2
2024
entrez:
15
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and length of stay (LOS) varies significantly following paraesophageal hernia surgery. We performed a Canadian multicenter positive deviance (PD) seminar to review individual center and national level data and establish holistic perioperative practice recommendations. A national virtual PD seminar was performed in October 2021. Recent best evidence focusing on AEs and LOS was presented. Subsequently, anonymized center-level AE and LOS data collected between 01/2017 and 01/2021 from a prospective, web-based database that tracks postoperative outcomes was presented. The top two performing centers with regards to these metrics were chosen and surgeons from these hospitals discussed elements of their treatment pathways that contributed to these outcomes. Consensus recommendations were then identified with participants independently rating their level of agreement. Twenty-eight surgeons form 8 centers took part in the seminar across 5 Canadian provinces. Of the 680 included patients included, Clavien-Dindo grade I and II/III/IV/V complications occurred in 121/39/12/2 patients (17.8%/5.7%/1.8%/0.3%). Respiratory complications were the most common (effusion 12/680, 1.7% and pneumonia 9/680, 1.3%). Esophageal and gastric perforation occurred in 7 and 4/680, (1.0% and 0.6% respectively). Median LOS varied significantly between institutions (1 day, range 1-3 vs. 7 days, 3-8, p < 0.001). A strong level of agreement was achieved for 10/12 of the consensus statements generated. PD seminars provide a supportive forum for centers to review best evidence and experience and generate recommendations based on expert opinion. Further research is ongoing to determine if this approach effectively accomplishes this objective.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and length of stay (LOS) varies significantly following paraesophageal hernia surgery. We performed a Canadian multicenter positive deviance (PD) seminar to review individual center and national level data and establish holistic perioperative practice recommendations.
METHODS
METHODS
A national virtual PD seminar was performed in October 2021. Recent best evidence focusing on AEs and LOS was presented. Subsequently, anonymized center-level AE and LOS data collected between 01/2017 and 01/2021 from a prospective, web-based database that tracks postoperative outcomes was presented. The top two performing centers with regards to these metrics were chosen and surgeons from these hospitals discussed elements of their treatment pathways that contributed to these outcomes. Consensus recommendations were then identified with participants independently rating their level of agreement.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Twenty-eight surgeons form 8 centers took part in the seminar across 5 Canadian provinces. Of the 680 included patients included, Clavien-Dindo grade I and II/III/IV/V complications occurred in 121/39/12/2 patients (17.8%/5.7%/1.8%/0.3%). Respiratory complications were the most common (effusion 12/680, 1.7% and pneumonia 9/680, 1.3%). Esophageal and gastric perforation occurred in 7 and 4/680, (1.0% and 0.6% respectively). Median LOS varied significantly between institutions (1 day, range 1-3 vs. 7 days, 3-8, p < 0.001). A strong level of agreement was achieved for 10/12 of the consensus statements generated.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
PD seminars provide a supportive forum for centers to review best evidence and experience and generate recommendations based on expert opinion. Further research is ongoing to determine if this approach effectively accomplishes this objective.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. World Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Surgery/Société Internationale de Chirurgie (ISS/SIC).
Références
O’Donnell, F. L., and S. B. Taubman. 2016. “Incidence of Hiatal Hernia in Service Members, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2005-2014.” MSMR 23(8): 11-15.
Yu, H.-Xiang, C.-Shan Han, J.-Ru Xue, Z.-Feng Han, and Hua Xin. 2018. “Esophageal Hiatal Hernia: Risk, Diagnosis and Management.” Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 12(4): 319-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2018.1441711.
Richter, Joel E., and Joel H. Rubenstein. 2018. “Presentation and Epidemiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.” Gastroenterology 154(2): 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.045.
Stylopoulos, Nicholas, G. Scott Gazelle, and David W. Rattner. 2002. “Paraesophageal Hernias: Operation or Observation?”. Annals of Surgery 236(4): 492-500. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200210000-00012.
Kohn, Geoffrey Paul, Raymond Richard Price, Steven R. DeMeester, Jörg Zehetner, Oliver J. Muensterer, Ziad Awad, Sumeet K. Mittal, William S. Richardson, Dimitrios Stefanidis, and Robert D. Fanelli. 2013. “Guidelines for the Management of Hiatal Hernia.” Surgical Endoscopy 27(12): 4409-4428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3173-3.
Velanovich, Vic. 2021. “Practice-Changing Milestones in Anti-reflux and Hiatal Hernia Surgery: a Single Surgeon Perspective over 27 Years and 1200 Operations.” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 25(11): 2757-2769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-04940-3.
Zevin, B., E. L. Jones, S. E. Martin del Campo, and K. A. Perry. 2017. “Omission of Preoperative Esophageal Manometry Does Not Alter Operative Approach or Postoperative Dysphagia Following Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair.” Diseases of the Esophagus 30(7): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/dox044.
Hosein, Salim, Tyson Carlson, Laura Flores, Priscila Rodrigues Armijo, and Dmitry Oleynikov. 2021. “Minimally Invasive Approach to Hiatal Hernia Repair Is Superior to Open, Even in the Emergent Setting: a Large National Database Analysis.” Surgical Endoscopy 35(1): 423-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07404-y.
Zhang, Chao, Diangang Liu, Fei Li, David I. Watson, Xiang Gao, Jan H. Koetje, Tao Luo, Chao Yan, Xing Du, and Zhonggao Wang. 2017. “Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Mesh versus Suture Repair of Hiatus Hernia: Objective and Subjective Outcomes.” Surgical Endoscopy 31(12): 4913-4922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5586-x.
Sathasivam, Rajeev, Gopinath Bussa, Yirupaiahgari Viswanath, R.-Bolton Obuobi, Talvinder Gill, Anil Reddy, Venkat Shanmugam, Andy Gilliam, and Prem Thambi. 2019. “‘Mesh Hiatal Hernioplasty’ versus ‘suture Cruroplasty’ in Laparoscopic Para-Oesophageal Hernia Surgery; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Asian Journal of Surgery 42(1): 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.05.001.
Müller-Stich, Beat P., Hannes G. Kenngott, Matthias Gondan, Christian Stock, Georg R. Linke, Franziska Fritz, Felix Nickel, Markus K. Diener, Carsten N. Gutt, Moritz Wente, Markus W. Büchler, and Lars Fischer. 2015. “Use of Mesh in Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis and Risk-Benefit Analysis.” PLoS One 10(10): e0139547. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139547.
Petric, Josipa, Tim Bright, David S. Liu, Melissa Wee Yun, and David I. Watson. 2022. “Sutured versus Mesh-Augmented Hiatus Hernia Repair.” Annals of Surgery 275(1): e45-e51. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000004902.
Angeramo, Cristian A., and Francisco Schlottmann. 2022. “Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair to Mesh or Not to Mesh. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Annals of Surgery 275(1): 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004913.
Molina, Juan Carlos, Ana María Misariu, Ioana Nicolau, Jonathan Spicer, David Mulder, Lorenzo E. Ferri, and Carmen L. Mueller. 2018. “Same Day Discharge for Benign Laparoscopic Hiatal Surgery: a Feasibility Analysis.” Surgical Endoscopy 32(2): 937-944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5769-5.
Gutierrez, Rigoberto, Colleen O’ Neill, Anshu Khanna, Andre Miller, and Farzaneh Banki. 2020. “Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair as Same Day Surgery: Feasibility, Short-Term Outcomes and Costs.” Americas Journal of Surgery 220(6): 1438-1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.09.009.
Mungo, Benedetto, Daniela Molena, Miloslawa Stem, Richard L. Feinberg, and Anne O. Lidor. 2014. “Thirty-day Outcomes of Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Using the NSQIP Database: Should Laparoscopy Be the Standard of Care?”. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 219(2): 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.02.030.
Wishik, S. M., and S. Vynckt. 1976. “The Use of Nutritional “Positive Deviants” to Identify Approaches for Modification of Dietary Practices.” American Journal of Public Health 66(1): 38-42. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.66.1.38.
Marsh, David R., Dirk G. Schroeder, Kirk A. Dearden, Jerry Sternin, and Monique Sternin. 2004. “The Power of Positive Deviance.” British Medical Journal 329(7475): 1177-1179. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7475.1177.
Bradley, Elizabeth H., Leslie A. Curry, Shoba Ramanadhan, Laura Rowe, Ingrid M. Nembhard, and Harlan M. Krumholz. 2009. “Research in Action: Using Positive Deviance to Improve Quality of Health Care.” Implementation Science 4(25): 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-25.
Ivanovic, Jelena, Andrew J. E. Seely, Caitlin Anstee, Patrick James Villeneuve, Sebastien Gilbert, Donna E. Maziak, Farid M. Shamji, Alan J. Forster, and Sudhir R. Sundaresan. 2014. “Measuring Surgical Quality: Comparison of Postoperative Adverse Events with the American College of Surgeons NSQIP and the Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality Classification System.” Journal of the American College of Surgeons 218(5): 1024-1031: Epub 2014 Jan 18. PMID: 24661854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.043.
Ivanovic, Jelena, Caitlin Anstee, Tim Ramsay, Sebastien Gilbert, Donna E. Maziak, Farid M. Shamji, R. Sudhir Sundaresan, P. James Villeneuve, and Andrew J. E. Seely. 2015. “Using Surgeon-specific Outcome Reports and Positive Deviance for Continuous Quality Improvement.” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 100(4): 1188-1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.012.
Meshikhes, A.-Wahed Nasir. 2015. “Evidence-based Surgery: The Obstacles and Solutions.” International Journal of Surgery 18: 159-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.071.
Baxter, Ruth, Natalie Taylor, Ian Kellar, and Rebecca Lawton. 2016. “What Methods Are Used to Apply Positive Deviance within Healthcare Organisations? A Systematic Review.” BMJ Quality and Safety 25(3): 190-201. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004386.
Mackintosh, U., D. Marsh, and D. Schroeder. 2002. “Sustained Positive Deviant Child Cre Practicies Nd Their Effect on Child Growth in Viet Nam.” Food and Nutrition Bulletin 23(4): 18-27.
Okrainec, Allan, Lorenzo E. Ferri, Liane S. Feldman, and Gerald M. Fried. 2011. “Defining the Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: A CUSUM Analysis.” Surgical Endoscopy 25(4): 1083-1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1321-6.
Neo, Eu Ling, Urs Zingg, Peter G. Devitt, Glyn G. Jamieson, and David I. Watson. 2010. “Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Repair of Very Large Hiatal Hernia.” Surgical Endoscopy 25(6): 1775-1782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1461-8.
Schlottmann, Francisco, Paula D. Strassle, Marco E. Allaix, and Marco G. Patti. 2017. “Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in the USA: Trends of Utilization Stratified by Surgical Volume and Consequent Impact on Perioperative Outcomes.” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 21(8): 1199-1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3469-z.
Ivanovic, Jelena, Fargol Mostofian, Caitlin Anstee, Sebastien Gilbert, Donna E. Maziak, Farid M. Shamji, Ramanadhan Sudhir Sundaresan, Patrick James Villeneuve, and Andrew J. E. Seely. 2018. “Impact of Surgeon Self-Evaluation and Positive Deviance on Postoperative Adverse Events after Non-cardiac Thoracic Surgery.” Journal for Healthcare Quality 40(4): e62-e70. https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000130.
Seely, Andrew J. E., Zubair Ahmadzai, Daniel G. French, Molly Gingrich, Daniel Jones, Caitlin Anstee, Najib Safieddine, Thomas K. Waddell, Richard Malthaner, Lorenzo Ferri, Christian Finley, and Gail Darling. 2023. “Multicentre Positive Deviance to Reduce Adverse Events and Length of Stay after Pulmonary Resection.” BMJ Open 12(1): e001997. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001997.
Hughes, Lesley, Laura Sheard, Lisa Pinkney, and Rebecca L. Lawton. 2020. “Excellence in Elective Hip and Knee Surgery: what Does it Look like? A Positive Deviance Approach.” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 25(1): 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819619867350.
Schwulst, Steven J., and John E. Mazuski. 2012. “Surgical Prophylaxis and Other Complication Avoidance Care Bundles.” Surgical Clinics of North America 92(2): 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2012.01.011.
Swanstrom, Lee L., Blair A. Jobe, Luke R. Kinzie, and Karen D. Horvath. 1999. “Esophageal Motility and Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair and Fundoplication.” Americas Journal of Surgery 177(5): 359-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00062-8.
Nagpal, AnishP., Harshad Soni, and Sanjiv Haribhakti. 2010. “Is Oesophageal Manometry a Must before Laparoscopic Fundoplication? Analysis of 46 Consecutive Patients Treated without Preoperative Manometry.” Journal of Minimal Access Surgery 6(3): 66-69. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.68581.
Wongkietkachorn, Apinut, Nuttapone Wongkietkachorn, and Peera Rhunsiri. 2018. “Preoperative Needs-Based Education to Reduce Anxiety, Increase Satisfaction, and Decrease Time Spent in Day Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” World Journal of Surgery 42(3): 666-674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4207-0.
Bramhall, Simon R., and Moustafa M. Mourad. 2019. “Wrap Choice during Fundoplication.” World Journal of Gastroenterology 25(48): 6876-6879. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6876.
Patti, Marco G., Thomas Robinson, Carlos Galvani, Maria V. Gorodner, Piero M. Fisichella, Lawrence W. Way, J. G. Hunter, and M. G. Patti. 2004. “Total Fundoplication Is Superior to Partial Fundoplication Even when Esophageal Peristalsis Is Weak.” Journal of the American College of Surgeons 198(6): 863-869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.01.029.