Does the universal adhesive's film thickness affect dentin-bonding effectiveness?
Adhesive
Bonding
Class I
Durability
Interface
Journal
Clinical oral investigations
ISSN: 1436-3771
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Investig
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707115
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Feb 2024
15 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
24
11
2023
accepted:
19
01
2024
medline:
15
2
2024
pubmed:
15
2
2024
entrez:
15
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To investigate the influence of adhesive resin application modalities on the film thickness of the adhesive resin and the effectiveness of a two-step universal adhesive (UA) bonded in self-etch (SE) bonding mode to high C-factor class-I cavity-bottom dentin. After application of the primer of G2-Bond Universal (G2B, GC), the adhesive resin was applied into standard class-I cavities (human molars) following four application modalities: (1) one layer, strongly air-blown; (2) one layer, gently air-blown; (3) two layers, each gently air-blown; (4) one layer, not air-blown. After being restored with composite, each tooth was sectioned to obtain one micro-specimen (n = 10), of which the adhesive resin film thickness was measured using optical microscopy. The micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) was tested immediately or upon 100,000 thermocycles. Statistical analyses involved Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U testing (p < 0.05). G2B's μTBS was significantly affected by the adhesive resin application modality and aging. Gently air-blowing the adhesive resin resulted in significantly higher immediate μTBS than strong air-blowing or no air-blowing. No significant difference in μTBS was found between single or double gently air-blown adhesive resin applications. The adhesive resin film thickness significantly varied with the application modalities. A too thin or too thick adhesive resin film thickness adversely affected bond strength of the two-step UA applied in SE mode and high C-factor condition. The adhesive resin layer thickness can affect the bonding performance of two-step UAs in high C-factor cavities. Dental clinicians remain advised to avoid improper air-blowing of UAs and strictly follow the application instructions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38358575
doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05523-7
pii: 10.1007/s00784-024-05523-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
150Subventions
Organisme : China Scholarship Council
ID : No. 201906270273
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Cidreira Boaro LC, Pereira Lopes D, de Souza ASC, Lie Nakano E, Ayala Perez MD, Pfeifer CS, Gonçalves F (2019) Clinical performance and chemical-physical properties of bulk fill composites resin - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater 35(10):e249–e264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.007
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.007
pubmed: 31421957
Ferracane JL, Hilton TJ (2016) Polymerization stress–is it clinically meaningful? Dent Mater 32(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.020
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.020
pubmed: 26220776
Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1987) Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66(11):1636–1639. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660110601
doi: 10.1177/00220345870660110601
pubmed: 10872397
Van Ende A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B (2013) Bulk-filling of high C-factor posterior cavities: effect on adhesion to cavity-bottom dentin. Dent Mater 29(3):269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.002
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.002
pubmed: 23228335
De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B (2005) A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 84(2):118–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204
doi: 10.1177/154405910508400204
pubmed: 15668328
Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M (2020) From Buonocore’s pioneering acid-etch technique to self-adhering restoratives. A status perspective of rapidly advancing dental adhesive technology. J Adhes Dent 22(1):7–34. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a43994
doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a43994
pubmed: 32030373
Perdigão J (2020) Current perspectives on dental adhesion: (1) dentin adhesion - not there yet. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 56(1):190–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.08.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.08.004
pubmed: 34188727
pmcid: 8216299
Fujiwara S, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Imai A, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Nakatsuka T, Miyazaki M (2018) Effect of double-layer application on bond quality of adhesive systems. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 77:501–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.10.008
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.10.008
pubmed: 29040961
Zheng L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J (2001) Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 26(1):97–104
pubmed: 11203783
Lodovici E, Reis A, Geraldeli S, Ferracane JL, Ballester RY, Rodrigues Filho LE (2009) Does adhesive thickness affect resin-dentin bond strength after thermal/load cycling? Oper Dent 34(1):58–64. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-37
doi: 10.2341/08-37
pubmed: 19192838
D’Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Prosperi GD, Di Bussolo G, De Angelis F, D’Amario M, Caputi S (2009) The influence of adhesive thickness on the microtensile bond strength of three adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent 11(2):109–115
pubmed: 19492712
Gauthier MA, Stangel I, Ellis TH, Zhu XX (2005) Oxygen inhibition in dental resins. J Dent Res 84(8):725–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400808
doi: 10.1177/154405910508400808
pubmed: 16040730
Oyama K, Tsujimoto A, Otsuka E, Shimizu Y, Shiratsuchi K, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Miyazaki M (2012) Influence of oxygen inhibition on the surface free energy and enamel bond strength of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater J 31(1):26–31. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-162
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2011-162
pubmed: 22277602
Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH (1990) The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 69(10):1652–1658. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690100501
doi: 10.1177/00220345900690100501
pubmed: 2212209
Suh BI (2004) Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 16(5):316–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00060.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00060.x
pubmed: 15726800
Perdigão J, Araujo E, Ramos RQ, Gomes G, Pizzolotto L (2021) Adhesive dentistry: current concepts and clinical considerations. J Esthet Restor Dent 33(1):51–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12692
doi: 10.1111/jerd.12692
pubmed: 33264490
Cadenaro M, Antoniolli F, Sauro S, Tay FR, Di Lenarda R, Prati C, Biasotto M, Contardo L, Breschi L (2005) Degree of conversion and permeability of dental adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 113(6):525–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00251.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00251.x
pubmed: 16324144
Miyazaki M, Onose H, Iida N, Kazama H (2003) Determination of residual double bonds in resin-dentin interface by Raman spectroscopy. Dent Mater 19(3):245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00039-8
doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00039-8
pubmed: 12628438
Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1993) Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 72(10):1434–1442. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720101401
doi: 10.1177/00220345930720101401
pubmed: 8408887
Tang C, Ahmed MH, Yao C, Mercelis B, Yoshihara K, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B (2023) Experimental two-step universal adhesives bond durably in a challenging high C-factor cavity model. Dent Mater 39(1):70–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.11.021
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.11.021
pubmed: 36481302
Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL (1990) Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69(6):1240–1243. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690060301
doi: 10.1177/00220345900690060301
pubmed: 2141338
Ahmed MH, Yao C, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B (2020) Extra bonding layer compensates universal adhesive’s thin film thickness. J Adhes Dent 22(5):483–501. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a45179
doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a45179
pubmed: 33073780
Perdigão J, Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez IV, Staichak R, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2014) Immediate adhesive properties to dentin and enamel of a universal adhesive associated with a hydrophobic resin coat. Oper Dent 39(5):489–499. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-203-lr
doi: 10.2341/13-203-lr
pubmed: 24299446
Zecin-Deren A, Sokolowski J, Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Piwonski I, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Lapinska B (2019) Multi-layer application of self-etch and universal adhesives and the effect on dentin bond strength. Molecules 24(2):345. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24020345
doi: 10.3390/molecules24020345
pubmed: 30669394
pmcid: 6358738
Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G (1999) Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 15(2):128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00022-6
doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00022-6
pubmed: 10551104
El-Askary FS, Van Noort R (2011) Effect of air-drying pressure and distance on microtensile bond strength of a self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 13(2):147. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a18782
doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a18782
pubmed: 21594228
Hiraishi N, Breschi L, Prati C, Ferrari M, Tagami J, King NM (2007) Technique sensitivity associated with air-drying of HEMA-free, single-bottle, one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 23(4):498–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.007
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.007
pubmed: 16690113
Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J (2007) Effects of solvent drying time on micro-shear bond strength and mechanical properties of two self-etching adhesive systems. Dent Mater 23(9):1114–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.042
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.042
pubmed: 17113635
Armstrong S, Breschi L, Özcan M, Pfefferkorn F, Ferrari M, Van Meerbeek B (2017) Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) approach. Dent Mater 33(2):133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.015
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.015
pubmed: 28007396
R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing (version 4.0.3). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org
Tang C, Ahmed MH, Yao C, Mercelis B, Yoshihara K, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B (2023) Bonding performance of experimental HEMA-free two-step universal adhesives to low C-factor flat dentin. Dent Mater 39(6):603–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.04.008
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.04.008
pubmed: 37164892
Yao C, Ahmed MH, Li X, Nedeljkovic I, Vandooren J, Mercelis B, Zhang F, Van Landuyt KL, Huang C, Van Meerbeek B (2020) Zinc-calcium-fluoride bioglass-based innovative multifunctional dental adhesive with thick adhesive resin film thickness. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12(27):30120–30135. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c06865
doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c06865
pubmed: 32530270
Sakaguchi R, Ferracane J, Powers J (eds) (2019) Craig’s restorative dental materials. Elsevier, St. Louis, Missouri
Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL (2000) The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res 79(3):812–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790030501
doi: 10.1177/00220345000790030501
pubmed: 10765953
Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ (2005) Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 21(12):1150–1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.004
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.004
pubmed: 16040118
Braga RR, Ballester RY, Ferracane JL (2005) Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resin-composites: a systematic review. Dent Mater 21(10):962–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.018
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.018
pubmed: 16085301
Nikolaenko SA, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf M, Petschelt A, Dasch W, Frankenberger R (2004) Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater 20(6):579–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.08.001
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.08.001
pubmed: 15134946
Kim HJ, Park SH (2014) Measurement of the internal adaptation of resin composites using micro-CT and its correlation with polymerization shrinkage. Oper Dent 39(2):E57-70. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-378-l
doi: 10.2341/12-378-l
pubmed: 24111809
Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Peumans M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005) Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 84(2):183–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400214
doi: 10.1177/154405910508400214
pubmed: 15668338
De Munck J, Ermis RB, Koshiro K, Inoue S, Ikeda T, Sano H, Van Landuyt KL, Van Meerbeek B (2007) NaOCl degradation of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to enamel and dentin following two air-blowing techniques. J Dent 35(1):74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.05.001
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.05.001
pubmed: 16860455
Spreafico D, Semeraro S, Mezzanzanica D, Re D, Gagliani M, Tanaka T, Sano H, Sidhu SK (2006) The effect of the air-blowing step on the technique sensitivity of four different adhesive systems. J Dent 34(3):237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.06.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.06.004
pubmed: 16202499
Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Katoh Y (2006) Effect of air-blowing variables on bond strength of all-in-one adhesives to bovine dentin. Dent Mater J 25(4):664–668. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.664
doi: 10.4012/dmj.25.664
pubmed: 17338298
De Munck J, Arita A, Shirai K, Van Landuyt KL, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Microrotary fatigue resistance of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to dentin. J Adhes Dent 9(4):373–379. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a12483
doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a12483
pubmed: 17847640
Japiassú Resende Montes MA, de Goes MF, Bernardi da Cunha MR, Borges Soares A (2001) A morphological and tensile bond strength evaluation of an unfilled adhesive with low-viscosity composites and a filled adhesive in one and two coats. J Dent 29(6):435–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00037-9
doi: 10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00037-9
Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Yildiz E, Yücel T, Vanherle G (1996) The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 9(4):167–173
pubmed: 9002793
Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL (1990) Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 64(6):658–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90291-j
doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90291-j
pubmed: 2079671
Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2002) Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 30(2):83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00002-7
doi: 10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00002-7
pubmed: 12381407
Taschner M, Kümmerling M, Lohbauer U, Breschi L, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R (2014) Effect of double-layer application on dentin bond durability of one-step self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 39(4):416–426. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-168-l
doi: 10.2341/13-168-l
pubmed: 24191868
Morresi AL, D’Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D’Arcangelo C, Monaco A (2014) Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 29:295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.013
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.013
pubmed: 24135128