The validity and reliability of school-based fundamental movement skills screening to identify children with motor difficulties.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 14 11 2022
accepted: 27 12 2023
medline: 15 2 2024
pubmed: 15 2 2024
entrez: 15 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Assess whether school-based teacher-led screening is effective at identifying children with motor difficulties. Teachers tested 217 children aged between 5 and 11 years old, after a one hour training session, using a freely available tool (FUNMOVES). Four classes (n = 91) were scored by both researchers and teachers to evaluate inter-rater reliability. Researchers assessed 22 children using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC-2; considered to be the 'gold standard' in Europe for use as part of the diagnostic process for Developmental Coordination Disorder) to assess concurrent and predictive validity. Inter-rater reliability for all individual activities within FUNMOVES ranged from 0.85-0.97 (unweighted Kappa; with 95%CI ranging from 0.77-1). For total score this was lower (κ = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.68-0.84), however when incorporating linear weighting, this improved (κ = 0.94, 95%CI = 0.89-0.99). When evaluating FUNMOVES total score against the MABC-2 total score, the specificity (1, 95%CI = 0.63-1) and positive predictive value (1; 95%CI = 0.68-1) of FUNMOVES were high, whereas sensitivity (0.57, 95%CI = 0.29-0.82) and negative predictive values (0.57, 95%CI = 0.42-0.71) were moderate. Evaluating only MABC-2 subscales which are directly related to fundamental movement skills (Aiming & Catching, and Balance) improved these values to 0.89 (95%CI = 0.52-1) and 0.93 (95%CI = 0.67-0.99) respectively. Teacher-led screening of fundamental movement skills (via FUNMOVES) is an effective method of identifying children with motor difficulties. Such universal screening in schools has the potential to identify movement difficulties and enable earlier intervention than the current norm.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38359032
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297412
pii: PONE-D-22-29655
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0297412

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Eddy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Lucy H Eddy (LH)

Department of Psychology, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Centre for Applied Education Research, Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, United Kingdom.

Nick Preston (N)

Centre for Applied Education Research, Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Shania Boom (S)

Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.

Jessica Davison (J)

Centre for Applied Education Research, Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, United Kingdom.
School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Rob Brooks (R)

Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.

Daniel D Bingham (DD)

Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, United Kingdom.

Mark Mon-Williams (M)

Centre for Applied Education Research, Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, United Kingdom.
School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, United Kingdom.

Liam J B Hill (LJB)

Centre for Applied Education Research, Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, United Kingdom.
School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH