Relative strength explains the differences in multi-joint rapid force production between sexes.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 18 04 2023
accepted: 21 12 2023
medline: 15 2 2024
pubmed: 15 2 2024
entrez: 15 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The primary aim of this study was to determine whether relative strength explains the differences in the rapid force production (force developed during first 150-, 200-, and 250 ms) of females and males, and to evaluate the relationships between peak force and rapid force production. Sixty-three team sport athletes (females: n = 25, age = 21.5 ± 1.3 years, stature = 166 ± 5 cm, body mass = 60.65 ± 10.04 kg; males: n = 38, age = 21.9 ± 1.1 years, stature = 178 ± 7 cm, body mass = 76.55 ± 12.88 kg) performed a series of isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) trials, with all participants' data used for correlational analysis. After testing, females and males were divided into 20 strength-matched pairs, based on their relative peak force (peak force ∙ body mass). There were no meaningful differences between sexes for relative force at 150 ms (g = 0.007 [95% CI -0.627, 0.648]), 200 ms (g = -0.059 [95% CI -0.695, 0.588]) and 250 ms (g = -0.156 [95% CI -0.778, 0.473]). Similarly, when expressed as a percentage of peak force there were no meaningful differences in force at 150 ms (g = -0.015 [95.0%CI -0.650, 0.680]), 200 ms (g = -0.099 [95.0%CI -0.714, 0.559]) or 250 ms (g = -0.272 [95.0%CI -0.856, 0.328]) between strength-matched females and males. Based on the correlations, there were very large to nearly perfect relationships (r = 0.77-0.94, p <0.001) between peak force and rapid force production, with peak force explaining 59%, 77% and 89% of the variance in force at 150-, 200- and 250 ms, respectively. When comparing females and males, relative strength (based on body weight or a percentage of peak force) should be considered, and practitioners should be aware of the role of peak force in rapid force production.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38359039
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296877
pii: PONE-D-23-10809
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0296877

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Comfort et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Paul Comfort (P)

Directorate of Psychology and Sport, University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom.
Strength and Power Research Group, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.

John J McMahon (JJ)

Directorate of Psychology and Sport, University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom.

Jason P Lake (JP)

Strength and Power Research Group, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.
Chichester Institute of Sport, Nursing, and Allied Health, University of Chichester, Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom.

Nicholas J Ripley (NJ)

Directorate of Psychology and Sport, University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom.

N Travis Triplett (NT)

Department of Public Health and Exercise Science, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina, United States of America.

G Gregory Haff (GG)

Directorate of Psychology and Sport, University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom.
Strength and Power Research Group, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.

Classifications MeSH