Real world outcomes of distributing Lucira Check-It® COVID self-tests in Ontario, Canada: the GetaKit COVID study.
COVID
GetaKit
Health services
Online testing
Rapid testing
Self-testing
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Feb 2024
15 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
14
06
2023
accepted:
16
01
2024
medline:
16
2
2024
pubmed:
16
2
2024
entrez:
15
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In Ontario, Canada we developed and implemented an online screening algorithm for the distribution of HIV self-tests, known as GetaKit. During the COVID pandemic, we adapted the GetaKit algorithm to screen for COVID based on population and infection data and distributed COVID rt-LAMP self-tests (using the Lucira Check-It®) to eligible participants. GetaKit/COVID was a prospective observational study that occurred over a 7-month period from September 2021 to April 2022. All potential participants completed an online registration and risk assessment, including demographic information, COVID symptoms and risk factors, and vaccination status. Bivariate comparisons were performed for three outcomes: results reporting status, vaccination status, and COVID diagnosis status. Data were analysed using Chi-Square for categorial covariates and Independent Samples T-Test and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous covariates. Bivariate logistic regression models were applied to examine associations between the covariates and outcomes. During the study period, we distributed 6469 COVID self-tests to 4160 eligible participants; 46% identified as Black, Indigenous or a Person of Colour (BIPOC). Nearly 70% of participants reported their COVID self-test results; 304 of which were positive. Overall, 91% also reported being vaccinated against COVID. Statistical analysis found living with five or fewer people, having tested for COVID previously, and being fully vaccinated were positive factors in results reporting. For COVID vaccination, people from large urban centers, who identified their ethnicity as white, and who reported previous COVID testing were more likely to be fully vaccinated. Finally, being identified as a contact of someone who had tested positive for COVID and the presence of COVID-related symptoms were found to be positive factors in diagnosis. While most participants who accessed this service were vaccinated against COVID and the majority of diagnoses were identified in participants who had symptoms of, or an exposure to, COVID, our program was able to appropriately link participants to recommended follow-up based on reported risks and results. These findings highlight the utility of online screening algorithms to provide health services, particularly for persons with historical barriers to healthcare access, such as BIPOC or lower-income groups.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In Ontario, Canada we developed and implemented an online screening algorithm for the distribution of HIV self-tests, known as GetaKit. During the COVID pandemic, we adapted the GetaKit algorithm to screen for COVID based on population and infection data and distributed COVID rt-LAMP self-tests (using the Lucira Check-It®) to eligible participants.
METHODS
METHODS
GetaKit/COVID was a prospective observational study that occurred over a 7-month period from September 2021 to April 2022. All potential participants completed an online registration and risk assessment, including demographic information, COVID symptoms and risk factors, and vaccination status. Bivariate comparisons were performed for three outcomes: results reporting status, vaccination status, and COVID diagnosis status. Data were analysed using Chi-Square for categorial covariates and Independent Samples T-Test and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous covariates. Bivariate logistic regression models were applied to examine associations between the covariates and outcomes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
During the study period, we distributed 6469 COVID self-tests to 4160 eligible participants; 46% identified as Black, Indigenous or a Person of Colour (BIPOC). Nearly 70% of participants reported their COVID self-test results; 304 of which were positive. Overall, 91% also reported being vaccinated against COVID. Statistical analysis found living with five or fewer people, having tested for COVID previously, and being fully vaccinated were positive factors in results reporting. For COVID vaccination, people from large urban centers, who identified their ethnicity as white, and who reported previous COVID testing were more likely to be fully vaccinated. Finally, being identified as a contact of someone who had tested positive for COVID and the presence of COVID-related symptoms were found to be positive factors in diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
While most participants who accessed this service were vaccinated against COVID and the majority of diagnoses were identified in participants who had symptoms of, or an exposure to, COVID, our program was able to appropriately link participants to recommended follow-up based on reported risks and results. These findings highlight the utility of online screening algorithms to provide health services, particularly for persons with historical barriers to healthcare access, such as BIPOC or lower-income groups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38360568
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17783-9
pii: 10.1186/s12889-024-17783-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
485Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Government of Canada. Public health management of cases and contacts associated with COVID-19. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/2019-novel-coronavirus-infection/health-professionals/interim-guidance-cases-contacts.html 2021. Accessed 10 May 2023.
Government of Canada. Testing for COVID-19: Importance of testing and contact tracing. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/2019-novel-coronavirus-infection/symptoms/testing.html 2022. Accessed 10 May 2023.
Jüni P, Baert S, Corbeil A, Johnstone J, Patel SN, Bobos P, et al. Use of rapid antigen tests during the Omicron wave. Sci Briefs Ont COVID-19 Sci Advisory Table. 2022;3(56). https://doi.org/10.47326/ocsat.2022.03.56.1.0
Health Canada. Testing for COVID-19 in vaccinated populations. https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/services/diseases/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/testing-screening-contact-tracing/testing-vaccinated-populations/testing-vaccinated-populations-eng.pdf 2021. Accessed 10 May 2023.
O’Byrne P, Orser L, Musten A, Ho N, Haines M, Lindsay J. Delivering COVID self-tests through GetaKit.ca: creating testing access during a pandemic. Pub Health Nurs. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13168
doi: 10.1111/phn.13168
O’Byrne P, Musten A, Orser L, Inamdar G, Grayson M-O, Jones C, et al. At-home HIV self-testing during COVID: implementing the GetaKit project in Ottawa. Can J Public Health. 2021;112(4):587–94.
doi: 10.17269/s41997-021-00505-8
pubmed: 33999399
pmcid: 8127455
O’Byrne P, Musten A, Orser L, Buckingham S. Automated STI/HIV risk assessments: testing an online clinical algorithm in Ottawa, Canada. Int J STD & AIDS. 2021;32(14):1365–73.
doi: 10.1177/09564624211031322
Ontario Ministry of Health. Management of cases and contacts of COVID-19 in Ontario. https://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/publichealth/coronavirus/docs/contact_mngmt/management_cases_contacts.pdf 2023. Accessed 13 May 2023.
Lucira Health. Lucira Check-It® COVID-19 test kit. https://www-fda-gov.proxy.bib.uottawa.ca/media/147494/download 2019. Accessed 13 May 2023.
Health Canada. Authorized medical devices for uses related to COVID-19: List of authorized testing devices. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/covid19-industry/medical-devices/authorized/list.html 2023. Accessed 13 May 2023.
Obeid JS, Davis M, Turner M, Meystre SM, Heider PM, et al. An artificial intelligence approach to COVID-19 infection risk assessment in virtual visits: a case report. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2020;8:1321–5.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa105
Yusof MK, Hamzah W, Rusli NSM. Efficiency of hybrid algorithm for COVID-19 online screening based on its symptoms. Indo J Electric Eng and Comp Sci. 2022;25(1):440–9.
Baumgart DC. Digital advantage in the COVID-19 response: perspective from Canada’s largest integrated digitalized healthcare system. NPJ Digit Med. 3:114–18.
Statistics Canada. COVID-19 mortality among racialized populations in Canada and its association with income. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/45-28-0001/2022001/article/00010-eng.htm 2022. Accessed 16 May 2023.
Kemei J, Olanlesi-Aliu A, Tunde-Byass M, Salami B. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on black communities in Canada. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):1580.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021580
pubmed: 36674335
pmcid: 9862348
Ezezkia O, Girmay B, Mengistu M, Barrett K. What is the health impact of COVID-19 among black communities in Canada? A systematic review. Can J Public Health. 2022;114:62–71.
doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00725-6
Ontario Ministry of Health. COVID-19 case data, 2021. https://data.ontario.ca/en/dataset/confirmed-positive-cases-of-covid-19-in-ontario/resource/822d637d-3416-4ad8-b09b-a748ae1370e0 2023. Accessed 16 May 2023.
Ontario Ministry of Health. Ethnic origin and visible minorities. https://www.ontario.ca/document/2016-census-highlights/fact-sheet-9-ethnic-origin-and-visible-minorities 2022. Accessed 16 May 2023.
Jones McMaughan D, Oloruntoba O, Smith ML. Socioeconomic status and access to healthcare: interrelated drivers for healthy aging. Front Public Health. 2020;8:231.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00231
Loignon C, Hudon C, Goulet E, Boyer S, De Laat M, Fournier N, et al. Perceived barriers to healthcare for persons living in poverty in Quebec, Canada: the EQUIhealTHY project. Int J Equity Health. 2015;17:24–32.
Gajarawala SN, Pelkowski JN. Telehealth benefits and barriers. J Nurse Pract. 2021;17(2):218–21.
doi: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.09.013
pubmed: 33106751
Hardcastle L, Ogbogu U. Virtual care: enhancing access or harming care? Healthc Manage Forum. 2020;33(6):288–92.
doi: 10.1177/0840470420938818
pubmed: 32686506
pmcid: 7372098
Bombard Y, Baker GR, Orlando E, Fancott C, Bhatia P, Casalino S et al. Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review. 2018;13:91–101.
Williams MT, Roy AK, MacIntyre M-P, Faber S. The traumatizing impact of racism in canadians of colour. Curr Trauma Rep. 2022;8(2):17–34.
doi: 10.1007/s40719-022-00225-5
pubmed: 35345606
pmcid: 8943361
Campbell J, Nathoo A, Chard S, Messenger D, Walker M, Bartels SA. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and or queer patient experiences in Canadian primary care and emergency departments: a literature review. Cult Health Sex. 2023;15:1–18.