Comparative evaluation of assay performance for SARS-CoV-2 detection in animal oral samples, lung homogenates, and phosphate-buffered saline using the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo kit.

One Health RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 matrix effect method evaluation

Journal

Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc
ISSN: 1943-4936
Titre abrégé: J Vet Diagn Invest
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9011490

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Feb 2024
Historique:
medline: 16 2 2024
pubmed: 16 2 2024
entrez: 16 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

A One Health approach has been key to monitoring the COVID-19 pandemic, as human and veterinary medical professionals jointly met the demands for an extraordinary testing effort for SARS-CoV-2. Veterinary diagnostic laboratories continue to monitor SARS-CoV-2 infection in animals, furthering the understanding of zoonotic transmission dynamics between humans and animals. A RT-PCR assay is a primary animal screening tool established within validation and verification guidelines provided by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (AAVLD), World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH), and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, differences in sample matrices, RNA extraction methods, instrument platforms, gene targets, and cutoff values may affect test outcomes. Therefore, targeted validation for a new sample matrix used in any PCR assay is critical. We evaluated a COVID-19 assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in feline and canine lung homogenates and oral swab samples. We used the commercial Applied Biosystems MagMAX Viral/Pathogen II (MVP II) nucleic acid isolation kit and TaqPath COVID-19 Combo kit, which are validated for a variety of human samples, including nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab samples. Our masked test showed a high detection rate and no false-positive or false-negative results, supporting sample extension to include feline oral swab samples. Our study is a prime example of One Health, illustrating how a COVID-19 assay designed for human testing can be adapted and used to detect SARS-CoV-2 in oral swab samples from cats and likely dogs, but not lung homogenates.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38362609
doi: 10.1177/10406387241230315
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

10406387241230315

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Megan R Miller (MR)

Center for Veterinary Medicine, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD, USA.

Andriy Tkachenko (A)

Center for Veterinary Medicine, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD, USA.

Jake Guag (J)

Center for Veterinary Medicine, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD, USA.

Stacey Alexander (S)

Department of Health and Human Services-Laboratory Services, North Dakota, Bismarck, ND, USA.

Brett T Webb (BT)

Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.

Brianna L S Stenger (BLS)

Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.

Classifications MeSH