Development of a Cancer Rehabilitation Dashboard to Collect Data on Physical Function in Cancer Patients and Survivors.


Journal

American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation
ISSN: 1537-7385
Titre abrégé: Am J Phys Med Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8803677

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 16 2 2024
pubmed: 16 2 2024
entrez: 16 2 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of the study is to describe the development of a cancer rehabilitation dashboard that collects data on physical function for cancer survivors in a cancer institute. This project was conducted at the Miami Cancer Institute. The cancer rehabilitation dashboard was developed by a team of physicians, biostatistician, and medical informatics teams to record, report and track the physical function of cancer survivors. A multimodal approach to the measurement of physical function was used and included the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function short form, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Fatigue short form, Timed Up and Go Test, Sit-to-Stand Test in 30-sec test, four-stage balance test, and grip strength. To develop this system, a Cerner Power Form was developed based on the physical function data. To display the data, a dedicated flowsheet was developed and placed within the Oncology Viewpoint in Cerner Millennium. Thus, from inside any patient record, the flowsheet could easily be accessed by providers without leaving normal clinician workflows. Using native functionality, the data can also be shown in graphical format to facilitate dialog with patients and oncology teams. All patient data from the Cerner Power Form discrete task assays were integrated into an existing Oncology Data Warehouse for all patients. The data elements in the Cerner Power Form were identified in the electronic medical record system, loaded into the Oncology Data Warehouse, and related to the other source systems to develop reports and data visualizations such as the cancer rehabilitation dashboard. The cancer rehabilitation dashboard allows visualization of numerous parameters of physical function in cancer survivors evaluated and treated and their change over time. Rendered in Tableau, the cancer rehabilitation dashboard acts as a centralized, interactive data source to analyze and connect clinicians to near real-time data. The cancer rehabilitation dashboard was successfully developed and implemented into a cancer rehabilitation practice in a cancer institute and used to collect and track physical function data for cancer survivors receiving treatment and cancer survivors. This information has been used to direct the treatment plan and educate individual patients about the impact of the cancer and its treatment on physical function as well as oncology teams in a cancer institute. The cancer rehabilitation dashboard provides an insight into the physical function of cancer survivors receiving treatment and cancer survivors using both self-reported and objective metrics. It can be customized to suit the interests of clinicians and researchers wishing to improve the quality of life of this population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38364028
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002424
pii: 00002060-202403001-00007
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

S36-S40

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Financial disclosure statements have been obtained, and no conflicts of interest have been reported by the authors or by any individuals in control of the content of this article.

Références

Helminski D, Kurlander JE, Renji AD, et al.: Dashboards in health care settings: protocol for a scoping review. JMIR Res Protoc 2022;11:e34894
Dowding D, Randell R, Gardner P, et al.: Dashboards for improving patient care: review of the literature. Int J Med Inform 2015;84:87–100
Stadler JG, Donlon K, Siewert JD, et al.: Improving the efficiency and ease of healthcare analysis through use of data visualization dashboards. Big Data 2016;4:129–35
Evans RS: Electronic health records: then, now, and in the future. Yearb Med Inform 2016;(suppl 1(suppl 1)):S48–61
Twohig PA, Rivington JR, Gunzler D, et al.: Clinician dashboard views and improvement in preventative health outcome measures: a retrospective analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2019;19:475
Gazivoda V, Stolz A, Saunders P, et al.: CovidStats: development and implementation of a daily COVID-19 clinical dashboard in an urban teaching hospital. Qual Manag Health Care 2022;31:259–66
Fareed N, Swoboda CM, Chen S, et al.: U.S. COVID-19 state government public dashboards: an expert review. Appl Clin Inform 2021;12:208–21
Denecke K, Nüssli S: Dashboard visualization of information for emergency medical services. Integr Citiz Centered Digit Health Soc Care Citiz Data Prod Serv Co-Creat 2020;275:27
Hensley NB, Grant MC, Cho BC, et al.: How do we use dashboards to enhance quality in cardiac anesthesia? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021;35:2969–76
Fox LA, Walsh KE, Schainker EG: The creation of a pediatric hospital medicine dashboard: performance assessment for improvement. Hosp Pediatr 2016;6:412–9
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, et al.: Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 2023;73:17–48
Janssen A, Donnelly C, Kay J, et al.: Developing an intranet-based lymphedema dashboard for breast cancer multidisciplinary teams: design research study. J Med Internet Res 2020;22:e13188
Cohen HJ: Functional assessment and the cancer survivor: something old, something new. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:1450–1
Muhandiramge J, Orchard SG, Warner ET, et al.: Functional decline in the cancer patient: a review. Cancer 2022;14:1368
Brown JC, Harhay MO, Harhay MN: Physical function as a prognostic biomarker among cancer survivors. Br J Cancer 2015;112:194–8
Brown JC, Harhay MO, Harhay MN: Patient-reported versus objectively-measured physical function and mortality risk among cancer survivors. J Geriatr Oncol 2016;7:108–15
Di Maio M, Basch E, Denis F, et al.: The role of patient-reported outcome measures in the continuum of cancer clinical care: ESMO clinical practice guideline. Ann Oncol 2022;33:878–92
Lehmann J, Rothmund M, Riedl D, et al.: Clinical outcome assessment in cancer rehabilitation and the central role of patient-reported outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2021;14:84
Smith SR, Vargo M, Zucker D, et al.: Psychometric characteristics and validity of the PROMIS Cancer Function Brief 3D Profile. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2022;103:S146–61
Fried L, Tangen C, Newman A, et al.: Cardiovascular health study collaborative research group: cardiovascular health study collaborative research group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56:146–55
Liu MA, DuMontier C, Murillo A, et al.: Gait speed, grip strength, and clinical outcomes in older patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood 2019;134:374–82
Nakano J, Fukushima T, Tanaka T, et al.: Physical function predicts mortality in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Support Care Cancer 2021;29:5623–34
Herman T, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM: Properties of the ‘timed up and go’ test: more than meets the eye. Gerontology 2011;57:203–10
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S: The timed “up & go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:142–8
Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, et al.: A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 1994;49:M85–94
Paul S, Bodner WR, Garg M, et al.: Cardiac irradiation predicts activity decline in patients receiving concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020;108:597–601
Purswani JM, Ohri N, Champ C: Tracking steps in oncology: the time is now. Cancer Manag Res 2018;Volume 10:2439–47
Low CA: Harnessing consumer smartphone and wearable sensors for clinical cancer research. NPJ Digit Med 2020;3:140

Auteurs

Adrian Cristian (A)

From the Cancer Rehabilitation, Cancer Patient Support Center-Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida (AC); Department of Oncology Research, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida (MR); Cancer Patient Support Center, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida (RO); New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York (KD); Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York (KD); Rehabilitation Medicine Service, Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (GS); Informatics Analyst, Department of Oncology Informatics, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida (MTD, ME, PRIL); Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida (SK, PM); and Department of Oncology Informatics.

Classifications MeSH