A new active bone-conduction implant: surgical experiences and audiological outcomes in patients with bilateral congenital microtia.
BCI602
Bone bridge
Congenital microtia
Hearing outcome
Sound source localization
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Feb 2024
16 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
20
10
2023
accepted:
31
01
2024
medline:
17
2
2024
pubmed:
17
2
2024
entrez:
16
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
First-generation bone bridges (BBs) have demonstrated favorable safety and audiological benefits in patients with conductive hearing loss. However, studies on the effects of second-generation BBs are limited, especially among children. In this study, we aimed to explore the surgical and audiological effects of second-generation BBs in patients with bilateral congenital microtia. This single-center prospective study included nine Mandarin-speaking patients with bilateral microtia. All the patients underwent BCI Generation 602 (BCI602; MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) implant surgery between September 2021 and June 2023. Audiological and sound localization tests were performed under unaided and BB-aided conditions. The transmastoid and retrosigmoid sinus approaches were implemented in three and six patients, respectively. No patient underwent preoperative planning, lifts were unnecessary, and no sigmoid sinus or dural compression occurred. The mean function gain at 0.5-4.0 kHz was 28.06 ± 4.55-dB HL. The word recognition scores improved significantly in quiet under the BB aided condition. Signal-to-noise ratio reduction by 10.56 ± 2.30 dB improved the speech reception threshold in noise. Patients fitted with a unilateral BB demonstrated inferior sound source localization after the initial activation. Second-generation BBs are safe and effective for patients with bilateral congenital microtia and may be suitable for children with mastoid hypoplasia without preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38365989
doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08523-1
pii: 10.1007/s00405-024-08523-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81770989
Organisme : Capital Health Research and Development of Special Fund
ID : 2020-2-2057
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Luquetti DV, Heike CL, Hing AV et al (2012) Microtia: epidemiology and genetics. Am J Med Genet 158A:124–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.34352
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34352
pubmed: 22106030
Shonka DC, Livingston WJ, Kesser BW (2008) The Jahrsdoerfer grading scale in surgery to repair congenital aural atresia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:873. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.134.8.873
doi: 10.1001/archotol.134.8.873
pubmed: 18711063
Lo JFW, Tsang WSS, Yu JYK et al (2014) Contemporary hearing rehabilitation options in patients with aural atresia. Biomed Res Int 2014:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/761579
doi: 10.1155/2014/761579
Yang J, Chen P, Zhao C et al (2020) Audiological and subjective outcomes of 100 implanted transcutaneous bone conduction devices and preoperative bone conduction hearing aids in patients with bilateral microtia-atresia. Acta Otolaryngol 140:667–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2020.1762929
doi: 10.1080/00016489.2020.1762929
Irmer C, Volkenstein S, Dazert S, Neumann A (2022) The bone conduction implant BONEBRIDGE increases quality of life and social life satisfaction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279:5555–5563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07384-w
doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07384-w
pubmed: 35524069
pmcid: 9649473
Takano K, Takahashi N, Ogasawara N, Himi T (2016) The association of external and middle ear anomaly and mandibular morphology in congenital microtia. Otol Neurotol 37:889–894. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001048
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001048
pubmed: 27093034
Plontke SK, Götze G, Wenzel C et al (2020) Implantation of a new active bone conduction hearing device with optimized geometry. HNO 68:106–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-020-00877-2
doi: 10.1007/s00106-020-00877-2
pubmed: 32725263
pmcid: 7403170
Yang J, Zhao C, Liu Y et al (2020) The effect of anatomical variables and use of the Lifts system on hearing outcomes after implantation of an active transcutaneous bone conduction device in bilateral congenital conductive hearing loss. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 49:57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-020-00452-3
doi: 10.1186/s40463-020-00452-3
pubmed: 32771065
pmcid: 7414544
Sprinzl GM, Schoerg P, Ploder M et al (2021) Surgical experience and early audiological outcomes with new active transcutaneous bone conduction implant. Otol Neurotol 42:1208–1215. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003230
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003230
pubmed: 34191781
Kim H, Park MK, Park SN et al (2023) Efficacy of the Bonebridge BCI602 for adult patients with single-sided deafness: a prospective multicenter study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.520
doi: 10.1002/ohn.520
pubmed: 38123511
Zhao C, Yang J, Liu Y et al (2020) Horizontal sound localisation and speech perception in Bonebridge-implanted single-sided deafness patients. J Laryngol Otol 134:814–821. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215120001899
doi: 10.1017/S0022215120001899
Rahne T, Schilde S, Seiwerth I et al (2016) Mastoid dimensions in children and young adults: consequences for the geometry of transcutaneous bone-conduction implants. Otol Neurotol 37:57–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000881
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000881
pubmed: 26641261
Zernotti ME, Di Gregorio MF, Zernotti M (2021) Alternative inverted middle fossa approach in Bonebridge surgery. Technique results and complications. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 25:e374–e378. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715152
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715152
pubmed: 34377170
Kong TH, Park YA, Seo YJ (2017) Image-guided implantation of the Bonebridge™ with a surgical navigation: a feasibility study. Int J Surg Case Rep 30:112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.11.057
doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.11.057
pubmed: 28012324
Law EKC, Bhatia KSS, Tsang WSS et al (2016) CT pre-operative planning of a new semi-implantable bone conduction hearing device. Eur Radiol 26:1686–1695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3983-x
doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3983-x
pubmed: 26385806
Lassaletta L, Sanchez-Cuadrado I, Muñoz E, Gavilan J (2014) Retrosigmoid implantation of an active bone conduction stimulator in a patient with chronic otitis media. Auris Nasus Larynx 41:84–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2013.04.004
doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2013.04.004
pubmed: 23722197
Šikolová S, Urík M, Hošnová D et al (2022) Two Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in children. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279:3387–3398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07068-x
doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07068-x
pubmed: 34495351
Huber AM, Sim JH, Xie YZ et al (2013) The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneously-activated bone anchored hearing device. Hear Res 301:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2013.02.003
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.02.003
pubmed: 23467173
Sprinzl G, Toner J, Koitschev A et al (2023) Multicentric study on surgical information and early safety and performance results with the Bonebridge BCI 602: an active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280:1565–1579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07792-y
doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07792-y
pubmed: 36625869
pmcid: 9988757
Yost WA (2016) Sound source localization identification accuracy: level and duration dependencies. J Acoust Soc Am 140:EL4–EL9. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4954870
doi: 10.1121/1.4954870