Characterizing coma in large vessel occlusion stroke.
Coma
Consciousness
LVO
Neuroethics
Stroke
Thrombectomy
Journal
Journal of neurology
ISSN: 1432-1459
Titre abrégé: J Neurol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0423161
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Feb 2024
16 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
30
11
2023
accepted:
14
01
2024
revised:
07
01
2024
medline:
17
2
2024
pubmed:
17
2
2024
entrez:
17
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Coma is an unresponsive state of disordered consciousness characterized by impaired arousal and awareness. The epidemiology and pathophysiology of coma in ischemic stroke has been underexplored. We sought to characterize the incidence and clinical features of coma as a presentation of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. Individuals who presented with LVO were retrospectively identified from July 2018 to December 2020. Coma was defined as an unresponsive state of impaired arousal and awareness, operationalized as a score of 3 on NIHSS item 1a. 28/637 (4.4%) patients with LVO stroke were identified as presenting with coma. The median NIHSS was 32 (IQR 29-34) for those with coma versus 11 (5-18) for those without (p < 0.0001). In coma, occlusion locations included basilar (13), vertebral (2), internal carotid (5), and middle cerebral (9) arteries. 8/28 were treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), and 20/28 died during the admission. 65% of patients not treated with EVT had delayed presentations or large established infarcts. In models accounting for pre-stroke mRS, basilar occlusion location, intravenous thrombolysis, and EVT, coma independently increased the odds of transitioning to comfort care during admission (aOR 6.75; 95% CI 2.87,15.84; p < 0.001) and decreased the odds of 90-day mRS 0-2 (aOR 0.12; 95% CI 0.03,0.55; p = 0.007). It is not uncommon for patients with LVO to present with coma, and delayed recognition of LVO can lead to poor outcomes, emphasizing the need for maintaining a high index of suspicion. While more commonly thought to result from posterior LVO, coma in our cohort was similarly likely to result from anterior LVO. Efforts to improve early diagnosis and care of patients with LVO presenting with coma are crucial.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Coma is an unresponsive state of disordered consciousness characterized by impaired arousal and awareness. The epidemiology and pathophysiology of coma in ischemic stroke has been underexplored. We sought to characterize the incidence and clinical features of coma as a presentation of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke.
METHODS
METHODS
Individuals who presented with LVO were retrospectively identified from July 2018 to December 2020. Coma was defined as an unresponsive state of impaired arousal and awareness, operationalized as a score of 3 on NIHSS item 1a.
RESULTS
RESULTS
28/637 (4.4%) patients with LVO stroke were identified as presenting with coma. The median NIHSS was 32 (IQR 29-34) for those with coma versus 11 (5-18) for those without (p < 0.0001). In coma, occlusion locations included basilar (13), vertebral (2), internal carotid (5), and middle cerebral (9) arteries. 8/28 were treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), and 20/28 died during the admission. 65% of patients not treated with EVT had delayed presentations or large established infarcts. In models accounting for pre-stroke mRS, basilar occlusion location, intravenous thrombolysis, and EVT, coma independently increased the odds of transitioning to comfort care during admission (aOR 6.75; 95% CI 2.87,15.84; p < 0.001) and decreased the odds of 90-day mRS 0-2 (aOR 0.12; 95% CI 0.03,0.55; p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
It is not uncommon for patients with LVO to present with coma, and delayed recognition of LVO can lead to poor outcomes, emphasizing the need for maintaining a high index of suspicion. While more commonly thought to result from posterior LVO, coma in our cohort was similarly likely to result from anterior LVO. Efforts to improve early diagnosis and care of patients with LVO presenting with coma are crucial.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38366071
doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12199-2
pii: 10.1007/s00415-024-12199-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIH BRAIN Initiative
ID : F32MH123001
Organisme : NIH Director's Office
ID : DP2HD101400
Organisme : American Academy of Neurology
ID : Palatucci Advocacy Award
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.
Références
Olson DM, Hemphill JC, Provencio JJ et al (2022) The curing coma campaign and the future of coma research. Semin Neurol 42:393–402
doi: 10.1055/a-1887-7104
pubmed: 35768013
Lewis A, Claassen J, Illes J et al (2022) Ethics priorities of the curing coma campaign: an empirical survey. Neurocrit Care 37(1):12–21
doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01506-2
pubmed: 35505222
pmcid: 10034145
Provencio JJ, Hemphill JC, Claassen J et al (2020) The curing coma campaign: framing initial scientific challenges—proceedings of the first curing coma campaign scientific advisory council meeting. Neurocrit Care 33:1–12
doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01028-9
pubmed: 32578124
pmcid: 7392933
Young MJ, Edlow BL (2021) The quest for covert consciousness: bringing neuroethics to the bedside. Neurology 96(19):893–896
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011734
pubmed: 33653901
pmcid: 8166443
Edlow BL, Fecchio M, Bodien YG et al (2023) Measuring consciousness in the intensive care unit. Neurocrit Care 38:1–7
doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01706-4
Peterson A, Young MJ, Fins JJ (2022) Ethics and the 2018 practice guideline on disorders of consciousness: a framework for responsible implementation. Neurology 98(17):712–718
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200301
pubmed: 35277446
pmcid: 9071367
Mertens M, King OC, Van Putten MJ, Boenink M (2022) Can we learn from hidden mistakes? Self-fulfilling prophecy and responsible neuroprognostic innovation. J Med Ethics 48(11):922–928
doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106636
pubmed: 34253620
Lazaridis C, Goldenberg FD, Mansour A, Kramer C, Tate A (2022) What does coma mean? implications for shared decision making in acute brain injury. World Neurosurg 158:e377–e385
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.185
pubmed: 34763107
Young MJ, Bodien YG, Giacino JT et al (2021) The neuroethics of disorders of consciousness: a brief history of evolving ideas. Brain 144(11):3291–3310
doi: 10.1093/brain/awab290
pubmed: 34347037
pmcid: 8883802
Young MJ, Kazazian K, Fischer D, Lissak IA, Bodien YG, Edlow BL (2024) Disclosing results of tests for covert consciousness: A framework for ethical translation. Neurocrit Care 19:1–4
Young MJ, Fecchio M, Bodien YG, Edlow BL (2024) Covert cortical processing: a diagnosis in search of a definition. Neurosci Conscious 2024(1):niad026
doi: 10.1093/nc/niad026
pubmed: 38327828
pmcid: 10849751
Lazaridis C (2019) Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in perceived devastating brain injury: the key role of uncertainty. Neurocrit Care 30:33–41
doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0595-8
pubmed: 30143963
Fischer D, Edlow BL, Giacino JT, Greer DM (2022) Neuroprognostication: a conceptual framework. Nat Rev Neurol 18(7):419–427
doi: 10.1038/s41582-022-00644-7
pubmed: 35352033
pmcid: 9326772