Anti-Müllerian hormone: A novel biomarker for detecting bovine freemartinism.

AMH freemartin heifer heterosexual twins reproduction sex differentiation

Journal

Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene
ISSN: 1439-0531
Titre abrégé: Reprod Domest Anim
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9015668

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2024
Historique:
revised: 23 01 2024
received: 07 12 2023
accepted: 01 02 2024
medline: 17 2 2024
pubmed: 17 2 2024
entrez: 17 2 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) indicates ovarian reserve in cattle, maintaining a consistent trajectory post-puberty. In heterosexual pregnancies, the development of the Müllerian duct in female foetuses is inhibited, resulting in an anticipated minimal or absent ovarian reserve capacity. This investigation aimed to compare AMH levels in healthy Holstein heifers that had reached puberty with those of freemartin animals of the same breed and age. The study incorporated Holstein heifers reaching puberty between 11 and 15 months of age in Group 1 (G1, n = 20) and freemartin animals in Group 2 (G2, n = 19, 16). AMH measurements (AMH-1/AMH-2) were recorded at 12-day intervals for the study participants. Notably, AMH levels in three freemartin animals could not be detected, prompting statistical analysis based on measurements from the remaining 16 freemartin animals in G2. A statistically significant correlation was observed between two separate measurements in G1 and G2 (p < .001). Furthermore, AMH-1 and AMH-2 levels were statistically higher in G1 than in G2 (p < .001). In G1, AMH-1 levels ranged from 227 to 677 pg/mL, with an average of 367.3 ± 25.5 pg/mL, and AMH-2 levels ranged from 234 to 645 pg/mL, with an average of 380.8 ± 24.4 pg/mL. Conversely, in G2, AMH-1 levels ranged from 10 to 72 pg/mL, with an average of 26.8 ± 4.44 pg/mL, and AMH-2 levels ranged from 12 to 68 pg/mL, with an average of 28.75 ± 4.18 pg/mL. The mean AMH levels in G1 were approximately 14 times higher than in G2 (p < .001). Consequently, ROC analysis utilizing AMH-1 and AMH-2 data established cut-off values of ≤72 and ≤ 68 pg/mL respectively for distinguishing freemartin animals. In conclusion, AMH could be used as a reliable biomarker for identifying Holstein freemartin animals.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38366707
doi: 10.1111/rda.14542
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e14542

Subventions

Organisme : Bursa Uludag University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit
ID : TAY-2022-712

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors. Reproduction in Domestic Animals published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Références

Akbarinejad, V., Gharagozlou, F., Vojgani, M., & Amirabadi, M. B. (2018). Nulliparous and primiparous cows produce less fertile female offspring with lesser concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) as compared with multiparous cows. Animal Reproduction Science, 197, 222-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.08.032
Alacam, E. (2015). İnekte infertilite sorunu. In E. Alacam (Ed.), Evcil hayvanlarda doğum ve infertilite (pp. 277-287). Medisan Press.
Alward, K. J., & Bohlen, J. F. (2020). Overview of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and association with fertility in female cattle. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 55(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13583
Anckaert, E., Denk, B., He, Y., Torrance, H. L., Broekmans, F., & Hund, M. (2019). Evaluation of the Elecsys® anti-Müllerian hormone assay for the prediction of hyper-response to controlled ovarian stimulation with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 236, 133-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.02.022
Cabianca, G., Rota, A., Cozzi, B., & Ballarin, C. (2007). Expression of AMH in female fetal intersex gonads in the bovine. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia, 36(1), 24-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0264.2006.00713.x
Cabrera, V. E., & Fricke, P. M. (2021). Economics of twin pregnancies in dairy cattle. Animals, 11(2), 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020552
De Rose, E. P., & Wilton, J. W. (1991). Productivity and profitability of twin births in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 69(8), 3085-3093. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.6983085x
Deeks, E. D. (2015). Elecsys® AMH assay: A review in anti-Müllerian hormone quantification and assessment of ovarian reserve. Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy, 19, 245-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-015-0156-1
Domain, G., Buczkowska, J., Kalak, P., Wydooghe, E., Banchi, P., Pascottini, O. B., Niżański, W., & van Soom, A. (2022). Serum anti-Müllerian hormone: A potential semen quality biomarker in stud dogs? Animals, 12(3), 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030323
El-Sheikh Ali, H., Kitahara, G., Takahashi, T., Mido, S., Sadawy, M., Kobayashi, I., Hemmi, K., & Osawa, T. (2017). Plasma anti-Müllerian hormone profile in heifers from birth through puberty and relationship with puberty onset. Biology of Reproduction, 97(1), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/iox069
Esteves, A., Båge, R., & Payan-Carreira, R. (2012). Freemartinism in cattle. In R. E. Mendes (Ed.), Ruminants: Anatomy, behavior and diseases (pp. 99-120). Nova Science.
Fricke, P. M. (2001). Twinning in dairy cattle. The Professional Animal Scientists, 17, 61-67. https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31599-0
Guerra-Martinez, P., Dickerson, G. E., Anderson, G. B., & Green, R. D. (1990). Embryo-transfer twinning and performance efficiency in beef production. Journal of Animal Science, 68(12), 4039-4050. https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.68124039x
Harikae, K., Tsunekawa, N., Hiramatsu, R., Toda, S., Kurohmaru, M., & Kanai, Y. (2012). Evidence for almost complete sex-reversal in bovine freemartin gonads: Formation of seminiferous tubule-like structures and transdifferentiation into typical testicular cell types. Journal of Reproduction and Development, 58(6), 654-660. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2012-070
Ireland, J. J., Smith, G. W., Scheetz, D., Jimenez-Krassel, F., Folger, J. K., Ireland, J. L. H., Mossa, F., Lonergan, P., & Evans, A. C. (2010). Does size matter in females? An overview of the impact of the high variation in the ovarian reserve on ovarian function and fertility, utility of anti-Müllerian hormone as a diagnostic marker for fertility and causes of variation in the ovarian reserve in cattle. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 23(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD10226
Jacobs, M. H., Reuter, L. M., Baker, V. L., Craig, L. B., Sakkas, D., Surrey, E., Doody, K. J., Jungheim, E. S., Bayrak, A. B., Hund, M., Verhagen-Kamerbeek, W. D. J., Pardue, D., Buck, K., & Timm, B. (2019). A multicentre evaluation of the Elecsys® anti-Müllerian hormone immunoassay for prediction of antral follicle count. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 38(5), 845-852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.041
Jazmín, G. A. A., Gustavo, M. D., Dominguez, A. S., Alejandro, P. H. R., Cedillo, R. S., Diana, Z. Á., & Uziel, C. V. (2023). Anti-Müllerian hormone and its utility in cattle reproduction. Open Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 13(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojvm.2023.131001
Jimenez-Krassel, F., Scheetz, D. M., Neuder, L. M., Ireland, J. L. H., Pursley, J. R., Smith, G. W., Tempelman, R. J., Ferris, T., Roudebush, W. E., Mossa, F., Lonergan, P., Evans, A. C., & Ireland, J. J. (2015). Concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone in dairy heifers is positively associated with productive herd life. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(5), 3036-3045. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8130
Kertz, N. C., Banerjee, P., Dyce, P. W., & Diniz, W. J. (2023). Harnessing genomics and transcriptomics approaches to improve female fertility in beef cattle-A review. Animals, 13(20), 3284. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13203284
Koca, D., Nak, Y., Sendag, S., Nak, D., Avcılar, T., Sahin, M. E., Arslan, T., Ozyigit, M. O., & Wehrend, A. (2023). Evaluation of serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations following treatment with vitamin D in Holstein Friesian heifers. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 58, 1695-1701. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.14486
Komisarek, J., & Dorynek, Z. (2002). Genetic aspects of twinning in cattle. Journal of Applied Genetics, 43, 55-68.
Kozubska-Sobocińska, A., Danielak-Czech, B., & Rejduch, B. (2016). Cytogenetic and molecular diagnostics of XX/XY chimerism in cattle, sheep, and goats-a review. Annals of Animal Science, 16(4), 989-1005.
Long, S. E. (1990). Development and diagnosis of freemartinism in cattle. In Practice, 12(5), 208-210.
López-Gatius, F., & Garcia-Ispierto, I. (2023). Sexing of embryos at the time of twin reduction: A clinical approach. Animals, 13(8), 1326. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081326
Marrella, M. A., & Biase, F. H. (2023). A multi-omics analysis identifies molecular features associated with fertility in heifers (Bos taurus). Scientific Reports, 13(1), 12664. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39858-0
Mossa, F., & Ireland, J. J. (2019). Physiology and endocrinology symposium: Anti-Müllerian hormone: A biomarker for the ovarian reserve, ovarian function, and fertility in dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science, 97(4), 1446-1455. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz022
Mossa, F., Jimenez-Krassel, F., Scheetz, D., Weber-Nielsen, M., Evans, A. C. O., & Ireland, J. J. (2017). Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and fertility management in agricultural species. Reproduction, 154(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-17-0104
National Research Council. (2001). Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle: 2001. National Academies Press.
Padula, A. M. (2005). The freemartin syndrome: An update. Animal Reproduction Science, 87(1-2), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.09.008
Peretti, V., Ciotola, F., Albarella, S., Paciello, O., Dario, C., Barbieri, V., & Iannuzzi, L. (2008). XX/XY chimerism in cattle: Clinical and cytogenetic studies. Sexual Development, 2(1), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1159/000117716
Pfeiffer, K. E., Jury, L. J., & Larson, J. E. (2014). Determination of anti-Müllerian hormone at estrus during a synchronized and a natural bovine estrous cycle. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 46, 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2013.05.004
Remnant, J. G., Lea, R. G., Allen, C. E., Huxley, J. N., Robinson, R. S., & Brower, A. I. (2014). Novel gonadal characteristics in an aged bovine freemartin. Animal Reproduction Science, 146(1-2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.02.011
Rico, C., Fabre, S., Médigue, C., di Clemente, N., Clément, F., Bontoux, M., Touzé, J. L., Dupont, M., Briant, E., Rémy, B., Beckers, J. F., & Monniaux, D. (2009). Anti-Müllerian hormone is an endocrine marker of ovarian gonadotropin-responsive follicles and can help to predict superovulatory responses in the cow. Biology of Reproduction, 80(1), 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.108.072157
Rico, C., Médigue, C., Fabre, S., Jarrier, P., Bontoux, M., Clément, F., & Monniaux, D. (2011). Regulation of anti-Müllerian hormone production in the cow: A multiscale study at endocrine, ovarian, follicular, and granulosa cell levels. Biology of Reproduction, 84(3), 560-571. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.110.088187
Rota, A., Ballarin, C., Vigier, B., Cozzi, B., & Rey, R. (2002). Age dependent changes in plasma anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations in the bovine male, female, and freemartin from birth to puberty: Relationship between testosterone production and influence on sex differentiation. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 129(1), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-6480(02)00514-2
Senünver, A., & Nak, Y. (2015). İnfertilite. In M. Kaymaz (Ed.), Çiftlik hayvanlarında doğum ve jinekoloji (pp. 365-370). Medipres Press.
Short, R. V. (1970). The bovine freemartin: A new look at an old problem. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 259, 141-147.
Souza, A. H., Carvalho, P. D., Rozner, A. E., Vieira, L. M., Hackbart, K. S., Bender, R. W., Dresch, A. R., Verstegen, J. P., Shaver, R. D., & Wiltbank, M. C. (2015). Relationship between circulating anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and superovulatory response of high-producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(1), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8182
Stojsin-Carter, A., Costa, N. N., de Morais, R., de Bem, T. H., Costa, M. P., Carter, T. F., Gillis, D. J., Neal, M. S., Ohashi, O. M., Miranda, M. S., Meirelles, F. V., Favetta, L. A., & King, W. A. (2017). Fetal sex alters maternal anti-Mullerian hormone during pregnancy in cattle. Animal Reproduction Science, 186, 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.09.010
Szczerbal, I., Kociucka, B., Nowacka-Woszuk, J., Lach, Z., Jaskowski, J. M., & Switonski, M. (2014). A high incidence of leukocyte chimerism (60, XX/60, XY) in single born heifers culled due to underdevelopment of internal reproductive tracts. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 59, 445-449.
Umer, S., Zhao, S. J., Sammad, A., Weldegebriall Sahlu, B., Pang, Y., & Zhu, H. (2019). AMH: Could it be used as a biomarker for fertility and superovulation in domestic animals? Genes, 10(12), 1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10121009
Villagómez, D. A. F., Parma, P., Radi, O., Di Meo, G., Pinton, A., Iannuzzi, L., & King, W. A. (2009). Classical and molecular cytogenetics of disorders of sex development in domestic animals. Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 126(1-2), 110-131.

Auteurs

Davut Koca (D)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey.

Yavuz Nak (Y)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.

Sait Sendag (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey.
Veterinary Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Neonatology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.

Deniz Nak (D)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.

Ali Osman Turgut (AO)

Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Siirt University, Siirt, Turkey.

Talha Avcılar (T)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.

Zeynep Merve Ekici (ZM)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.

Nebi Cetin (N)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey.

Kemal Bagci (K)

Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.

Ahmet Aktar (A)

Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.

Hakan Sagirkaya (H)

Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.

Selim Alcay (S)

Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.

Axel Wehrend (A)

Veterinary Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Neonatology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH