Associations between D3Cr muscle mass and MR thigh muscle volume with strength, power, physical performance, fitness, and limitations in older adults in the SOMMA study.
aging
muscle mass
sarcopenia
strength
Journal
The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences
ISSN: 1758-535X
Titre abrégé: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Feb 2024
17 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
01
09
2023
medline:
17
2
2024
pubmed:
17
2
2024
entrez:
17
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
How magnetic resonance (MR) derived thigh muscle volume and d3-creatine dilution derived muscle mass (D3Cr muscle mass) differentially relate to strength, fitness, and other functional in older adults - and whether associations vary by sex - is not known. Men (N=345) and women (N=482) aged ≥70 years from the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging completed leg extension strength (1-repetition max) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing to assess fitness (VO2peak). Correlations and adjusted regression models stratified by sex were used to assess the association between muscle size measures and study outcomes and sex interactions. D3Cr muscle mass and MR thigh muscle volume were correlated (men: r=0.62, women: r=0.51, p<.001). Each standard deviation decrement in D3Cr muscle mass was associated with lower 1-RM strength (-14 kg men, -4 kg women, p<.001 for both; p-interaction=0.003) and lower VO2peak (-79 mL/min men, -30 mL/min women, p<.001 for both, p interaction: 0.016). Each SD decrement in MR thigh muscle volume was also associated with lower strength (-32 kg men, -20 kg women, p<0.001 for both; p-interaction 0.139) and lower VO2peak (-217 mL/min men, -111mL/min women, p<.001 for both, p interaction: 0.010). There were associations, though less consistent, between muscle size or mass with physical performance and function; associations varied by sex. Less muscle -measured by either D3Cr muscle mass or MR thigh muscle volume - was associated with lower strength and fitness. Varied associations by sex and assessment method suggest consideration be given to which measurement to use in future studies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
How magnetic resonance (MR) derived thigh muscle volume and d3-creatine dilution derived muscle mass (D3Cr muscle mass) differentially relate to strength, fitness, and other functional in older adults - and whether associations vary by sex - is not known.
METHODS
METHODS
Men (N=345) and women (N=482) aged ≥70 years from the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging completed leg extension strength (1-repetition max) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing to assess fitness (VO2peak). Correlations and adjusted regression models stratified by sex were used to assess the association between muscle size measures and study outcomes and sex interactions.
RESULTS
RESULTS
D3Cr muscle mass and MR thigh muscle volume were correlated (men: r=0.62, women: r=0.51, p<.001). Each standard deviation decrement in D3Cr muscle mass was associated with lower 1-RM strength (-14 kg men, -4 kg women, p<.001 for both; p-interaction=0.003) and lower VO2peak (-79 mL/min men, -30 mL/min women, p<.001 for both, p interaction: 0.016). Each SD decrement in MR thigh muscle volume was also associated with lower strength (-32 kg men, -20 kg women, p<0.001 for both; p-interaction 0.139) and lower VO2peak (-217 mL/min men, -111mL/min women, p<.001 for both, p interaction: 0.010). There were associations, though less consistent, between muscle size or mass with physical performance and function; associations varied by sex.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Less muscle -measured by either D3Cr muscle mass or MR thigh muscle volume - was associated with lower strength and fitness. Varied associations by sex and assessment method suggest consideration be given to which measurement to use in future studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38367212
pii: 7609955
doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae056
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.