Preventing postpartum hemorrhage: A network meta-analysis on routes of administration of uterotonics.

Oxytocin Postpartum hemorrhage Ranking SUCRA Side-effects Third stage of labour

Journal

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
ISSN: 1872-7654
Titre abrégé: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 0375672

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 02 11 2023
revised: 06 02 2024
accepted: 09 02 2024
medline: 18 2 2024
pubmed: 18 2 2024
entrez: 17 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

1. To perform a network meta-analysis to specify the route of administration that maximises the effectiveness of each of the available prophylactic uterotonics without increasing the risk for side effects. 2. Literature searches on 12th September 2022 included: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. The reference lists of the retrieved study records were also searched. 3. Population: Randomized controlled trials involving women in the third stage of labour after a vaginal or caesarean delivery in hospital or community settings. Systemically administered prophylactic uterotonics of any route and dose for primary postpartum hemorrhage prevention. Comparison: Any other prophylactic uterotonic, or a different route or dose of a given uterotonic, or placebo, or no treatment. Outcomes (primary): postpartum hemorrhage ≥ 500 mL and ≥ 1000 mL. 4. Risk of bias and trustworthiness assessments were performed, according to Cochrane's guidance. Direct, indirect and network meta-analyses were conducted, and results were summarized either as risk ratio or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. The certainty of generated evidence was assessed according to the GRADE approach. Cumulative probabilities were calculated and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve was used to create a ranking of the available drugs. 5. One hundred eighty-one studies involving 122,867 randomised women were included. Most studies were conducted in hospital settings in lower-middle income countries and involved women delivering vaginally. When compared with intramuscular oxytocin, carbetocin (RR 0.58, 95 % CI 0.40-0.84) and oxytocin (RR 0.75, 95 % CI 0.59-0.97) by an intravenous bolus, and intramuscular ergometrine plus oxytocin combination (RR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.56-0.91) are probably more effective in preventing primary postpartum hemorrhage. Intramuscularly administered oxytocin and carbetocin by an intravenous bolus have a favourable side effects profile. 6. Generated evidence was generally moderate and global inconsistency was low. Carbetocin and oxytocin by an intravenous bolus, and intramuscular ergometrine plus oxytocin combination are probably the top uterotonics for primary postpartum hemorrhage prevention. Large scale studies exploring different routes of administration for available prophylactic uterotonics, and women's views should be conducted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38367391
pii: S0301-2115(24)00069-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.02.021
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

172-180

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Argyro Papadopoulou (A)

Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Heritage Building, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TH United Kingdom; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 80 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, Athens 11528, Greece. Electronic address: axp1015@student.bham.ac.uk.

Georgios Tournas (G)

Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 80 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, Athens 11528, Greece.

Georgios Georgiopoulos (G)

Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 80 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, Athens 11528, Greece.

Panos Antsaklis (P)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 80 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, Athens 11528, Greece.

Georgios Daskalakis (G)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 80 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, Athens 11528, Greece.

Arri Coomarasamy (A)

Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Heritage Building, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TH United Kingdom.

Adam J Devall (AJ)

Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Heritage Building, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TH United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH