Development and evaluation of a simple treatment eligibility score (HEPSANET) to decentralise hepatitis B care in Africa: a cross-sectional study.
Journal
The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology
ISSN: 2468-1253
Titre abrégé: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101690683
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Feb 2024
14 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
08
10
2023
revised:
13
12
2023
accepted:
14
12
2023
medline:
18
2
2024
pubmed:
18
2
2024
entrez:
17
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) elimination requires expanding and decentralising HBV care services. However, peripheral health facilities lack access to diagnostic tools to assess eligibility for antiviral therapy. Through the Hepatitis B in Africa Collaborative Network (HEPSANET), we aimed to develop and evaluate a score using tests generally available at lower-level facilities, to simplify the evaluation of antiviral therapy eligibility in people living with HBV. We surveyed the availability of clinical and laboratory parameters across different health-care levels in sub-Saharan Africa. We used data from the HEPSANET dataset, the largest cross-sectional dataset of treatment-naive people living with HBV in sub-Saharan Africa, to derive and validate the score. Participants from this dataset were included in the analysis if they were aged 18 years or older and had liver fibrosis stages determined by a liver stiffness measurement or liver histopathology. Participants with co-infections or metabolic disorders were excluded. We allocated participants to the derivation and validation sets by geographical site. In the derivation set, we used stepwise logistic regression to identify the best performing parameters for identifying participants that met the 2017 European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria. Regression coefficients were converted into integer points to construct simplified algorithms for different health-care levels. In the validation set, we estimated the area under the receiver operating characteristic, sensitivity, and specificity of the simplified algorithm for identifying antiviral therapy eligibility defined by the 2017 EASL criteria. At 11 sites from eight countries that returned surveys, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and platelet count were generally available at district hospital levels, and hepatitis B e antigen and point-of-care HBV DNA tests were available only at regional and provincial hospital levels or above. Among 2895 participants included from the HEPSANET database (1740 [60·1%] male, 1155 [39·9%] female), 409 (14·1%) met EASL antiviral therapy eligibility criteria. In the derivation set, the optimal district-level hospital score was: ALT (IU/L), less than 40 (0 points), 40-79 (+1), 80 or greater (+2); AST (IU/L), less than 40 (0), 40-79 (+1), 80 or greater (+2); and platelet counts (10 Using a score incorporating platelet counts, AST, and ALT, the majority of people living with HBV requiring antiviral therapy can be identified. Our findings suggest that clinical staging can be decentralised down to district hospital level in sub-Saharan Africa. European Association for the Study of the Liver Foundation, John C Martin Foundation. For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) elimination requires expanding and decentralising HBV care services. However, peripheral health facilities lack access to diagnostic tools to assess eligibility for antiviral therapy. Through the Hepatitis B in Africa Collaborative Network (HEPSANET), we aimed to develop and evaluate a score using tests generally available at lower-level facilities, to simplify the evaluation of antiviral therapy eligibility in people living with HBV.
METHODS
METHODS
We surveyed the availability of clinical and laboratory parameters across different health-care levels in sub-Saharan Africa. We used data from the HEPSANET dataset, the largest cross-sectional dataset of treatment-naive people living with HBV in sub-Saharan Africa, to derive and validate the score. Participants from this dataset were included in the analysis if they were aged 18 years or older and had liver fibrosis stages determined by a liver stiffness measurement or liver histopathology. Participants with co-infections or metabolic disorders were excluded. We allocated participants to the derivation and validation sets by geographical site. In the derivation set, we used stepwise logistic regression to identify the best performing parameters for identifying participants that met the 2017 European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria. Regression coefficients were converted into integer points to construct simplified algorithms for different health-care levels. In the validation set, we estimated the area under the receiver operating characteristic, sensitivity, and specificity of the simplified algorithm for identifying antiviral therapy eligibility defined by the 2017 EASL criteria.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
At 11 sites from eight countries that returned surveys, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and platelet count were generally available at district hospital levels, and hepatitis B e antigen and point-of-care HBV DNA tests were available only at regional and provincial hospital levels or above. Among 2895 participants included from the HEPSANET database (1740 [60·1%] male, 1155 [39·9%] female), 409 (14·1%) met EASL antiviral therapy eligibility criteria. In the derivation set, the optimal district-level hospital score was: ALT (IU/L), less than 40 (0 points), 40-79 (+1), 80 or greater (+2); AST (IU/L), less than 40 (0), 40-79 (+1), 80 or greater (+2); and platelet counts (10
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
Using a score incorporating platelet counts, AST, and ALT, the majority of people living with HBV requiring antiviral therapy can be identified. Our findings suggest that clinical staging can be decentralised down to district hospital level in sub-Saharan Africa.
FUNDING
BACKGROUND
European Association for the Study of the Liver Foundation, John C Martin Foundation.
TRANSLATION
UNASSIGNED
For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38367633
pii: S2468-1253(23)00449-1
doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00449-1
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests CWS has received speaker bureau honoraria from Gilead Sciences and Abbott, as well as travel support from Gilead Sciences. ES has received a research grant from Gilead Sciences. GW has received a research grant from Roche Diagnostics, Roche Molecular, and Gilead Sciences, and consulting fees from Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and ViiV. MA has received research grants from Prenetics, Pfizer, and Johnson & Johnson; consulting fees from Prenetics; honoraria from Pfizer; travel support from WHO; reports planned patents for Ramanomics and LAMP GC/CT/HSV/HBV; and is an unpaid board member of the Charity E3 initiative. MSo has received speaker bureau honoraria from Roche and Gilead Sciences, and travel support from Gilead Sciences. MV has received funding from the US National Institutes of Health (R01AI147727), and travel support from Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. PCM has received funding from the Wellcome Trust (110110) and the Francis Crick Institute, and also reports sponsorship from GSK for a doctoral student, outside the scope of the current work. YS has received a research grant and honoraria for lectures from Gilead Sciences and research materials from Abbott Laboratories and Fujirebio. All other authors declare no competing interests.