Early versus delayed amniotomy following transcervical Foley balloon in the induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial.

Active Labor Amniotomy Cervical Ripening Foley Balloon Labor Induction and Postpartum Hemorrhage

Journal

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1097-6868
Titre abrégé: Am J Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370476

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 27 11 2023
revised: 14 01 2024
accepted: 25 01 2024
medline: 18 2 2024
pubmed: 18 2 2024
entrez: 17 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To determine if amniotomy within two hours after Foley balloon removal compared with amniotomy four hours or later reduces the duration of active labor and time taken to achieve vaginal delivery in term pregnant women undergoing labor induction. An open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted at a single academic center from October 2020 to March 2023. Term participants eligible for pre-induction cervical ripening with Foley balloon were randomized into two groups: early amniotomy (rupture of membranes within two hours after Foley balloon removal) and delayed amniotomy (rupture of membranes performed more than four hours after Foley balloon removal). Randomization was stratified by parity. The primary outcome was time from Foley balloon insertion to active phase of labor. Secondary outcomes, including time to delivery, cesarean section rates, and maternal and neonatal complications, were analyzed using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. Of the 150 consented and enrolled participants, 149 were included in the analysis. In the intention-to-treat population, early amniotomy did not significantly shorten the time between Foley balloon insertion and active labor when compared to delayed amniotomy (885 vs. 975 minutes, P=0.08). Early amniotomy was associated with a significantly shorter time from Foley balloon placement to active labor in nulliparous individuals (1211 [584-2340) vs. 1585 (683-2760), P=0.02). When evaluating secondary outcomes, early amniotomy was associated with a significantly shorter time to active labor onset (312.5 vs. 442.5 minutes, P=0.02) and delivery (484 vs. 587 minutes, P=0.03) from Foley balloon removal, with a higher rate of delivery within 36 hours (96% vs. 85%, P=0.03). Individuals in the early amniotomy group reached active labor 1.5 times faster after Foley balloon insertion than those in the delayed group (hazard ratio (HR), 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-.2.2; P=0.02). Those with early amniotomy also reached vaginal delivery 1.5 times faster following Foley balloon removal than those in the delayed group (HR, 1.5; 95% [1-.2.2]; P=0.03). Delayed amniotomy was associated with a higher rate of postpartum hemorrhage (0% vs. 9.5%, P=0.01). No significant differences were observed in cesarean rates, length of hospital stay, maternal infection, or neonatal outcomes. While early amniotomy does not shorten time from Foley balloon insertion to active labor, it shortens time from Foley balloon removal to active labor and delivery without increasing complications. The increased postpartum hemorrhage rate in the delayed amniotomy group suggests increased risks with delayed amniotomy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38367749
pii: S0002-9378(24)00069-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.01.028
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Marissa Berry (M)

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA. Present address: Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

Kelly Lamiman (K)

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA. Present address: Division of Gynecologic Oncology, State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

Megan N Slan (MN)

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA. Present address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Xue Zhang (X)

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.

Daphne D Arena Goncharov (DD)

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.

Yihharn P Hwang (YP)

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA. Present address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist Sugar Land Hospital, Sugar Land, TX, USA.

Jennifer A Rogers (JA)

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.

Luis D Pacheco (LD)

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.

George R Saade (GR)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.

Antonio F Saad (AF)

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA. Present address: Inova Fairfax, VA, USA. Electronic address: Antonio.saad@inova.org.

Classifications MeSH