Polygenic risk scores for mood and related disorders and environmental factors: Interaction effects on wellbeing in the UK biobank.

Environment Mood disorders Polygenic risk score Stress Trauma

Journal

Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry
ISSN: 1878-4216
Titre abrégé: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8211617

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 30 08 2023
revised: 15 12 2023
accepted: 14 02 2024
medline: 18 2 2024
pubmed: 18 2 2024
entrez: 17 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Mood disorders have a genetic and environmental component and interactions (GxE) on the risk of psychiatric diseases have been investigated. The same GxE interactions may affect wellbeing measures, which go beyond categorical diagnoses and reflect the health-disease continuum. We evaluated GxE effects in the UK Biobank, considering as outcomes subjective wellbeing (feeling good and functioning well) and objective measures (education and income). We estimated the polygenic risk scores (PRSs) of major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Stressful/traumatic events during adulthood or childhood were considered as E variables, as well as social support. The addition of the PRSxE interaction to PRS and E variables was tested in linear or multinomial regression models, adjusting for confounders. We included 33 k-380 k participants, depending on the variables considered. Most PRSs and E factors showed additive effects on outcomes, with effect sizes generally 3-5 times larger for E variables than PRSs. We found some interaction effects, particularly when considering recent stress, history of a long illness/disability/infirmity, and social support. Higher PRSs increased the negative effects of stress on wellbeing, but they also increased the positive effects of social support, with interaction effects particularly for the outcomes health satisfaction, loneliness, and income (p < Bonferroni corrected threshold of 1.92e-4). PRSxE terms usually added ~0.01-0.02% variance explained to the corresponding additive model. PRSxE effects on wellbeing involve both positive and negative E factors. Despite small variance explained at the population level, preventive/therapeutic interventions that modify E factors could be beneficial at the individual level.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38367896
pii: S0278-5846(24)00040-X
doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.110972
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110972

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest Chiara Fabbri was a speaker for Janssen. Cathryn M. Lewis sits on the Scientific Advisory Board for Myriad Neuroscience, and she has been a consultant/speaker for SYNLAB and UCB. Alessandro Serretti is or was a consultant/speaker for Abbott, Abbvie, Angelini, AstraZeneca, Clinical Data, Boehringer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Innovapharma, Italfarmaco, Janssen, Lundbeck, Naurex, Pfizer, Polifarma, Sanofi, Taliaz and Servier.

Auteurs

Chiara Fabbri (C)

Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. Electronic address: chiara.fabbri@yahoo.it.

Cathryn M Lewis (CM)

Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Alessandro Serretti (A)

Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery, Kore University of Enna, Enna, Italy.

Classifications MeSH