Oxidation of cellulose fibers using LPMOs with varying allomorphic substrate preferences, oxidative regioselectivities, and domain structures.

AA9 LPMOs Cellulose Enzymatic fiber engineering Fluorescence Functional variation

Journal

Carbohydrate polymers
ISSN: 1879-1344
Titre abrégé: Carbohydr Polym
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8307156

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 26 10 2023
revised: 09 01 2024
accepted: 10 01 2024
medline: 18 2 2024
pubmed: 18 2 2024
entrez: 17 2 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) are excellent candidates for enzymatic functionalization of natural polysaccharides, such as cellulose or chitin, and are gaining relevance in the search for renewable biomaterials. Here, we assessed the cellulose fiber modification potential and catalytic performance of eleven cellulose-active fungal AA9-type LPMOs, including C1-, C4-, and C1/C4-oxidizing LPMOs with and without CBM1 carbohydrate-binding modules, on cellulosic substrates with different degrees of crystallinity and polymer chain arrangement, namely, Cellulose I, Cellulose II, and amorphous cellulose. The potential of LPMOs for cellulose fiber modification varied among the LPMOs and depended primarily on operational stability and substrate binding, and, to some extent, also on regioselectivity and domain structure. While all tested LPMOs were active on natural Cellulose I-type fibers, activity on the Cellulose II allomorph was almost exclusively detected for LPMOs containing a CBM1 and LPMOs with activity on soluble hemicelluloses and cello-oligosaccharides, for example NcAA9C from Neurospora crassa. The single-domain variant of NcAA9C oxidized the cellulose fibers to a higher extent than its CBM-containing natural variant and released less soluble products, indicating a more dispersed oxidation pattern without a CBM. Our findings reveal great functional variation among cellulose-active LPMOs, laying the groundwork for further LPMO-based cellulose engineering.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38368098
pii: S0144-8617(24)00042-0
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.121816
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

121816

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Fredrik G Støpamo (FG)

Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway. Electronic address: fredrik.gjerstad.stopamo@nmbu.no.

Irina Sulaeva (I)

University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: irina.sulaeva@boku.ac.at.

David Budischowsky (D)

University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: david.budischowsky@boku.ac.at.

Jenni Rahikainen (J)

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland. Electronic address: jenni.rahikainen@vtt.fi.

Kaisa Marjamaa (K)

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland. Electronic address: kaisa.marjamaa@vtt.fi.

Antje Potthast (A)

University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: antje.potthast@boku.ac.at.

Kristiina Kruus (K)

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland; Aalto University, Espoo, Finland. Electronic address: kristiina.kruus@aalto.fi.

Vincent G H Eijsink (VGH)

Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway. Electronic address: vincent.eijsink@nmbu.no.

Anikó Várnai (A)

Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway. Electronic address: aniko.varnai@nmbu.no.

Classifications MeSH