Ultra-high-resolution CT of the temporal bone: Comparison between deep learning reconstruction and hybrid and model-based iterative reconstruction.

Computed tomography Deep learning Image enhancement Image reconstruction Temporal bone

Journal

Diagnostic and interventional imaging
ISSN: 2211-5684
Titre abrégé: Diagn Interv Imaging
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101568499

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 21 12 2023
revised: 31 01 2024
accepted: 01 02 2024
medline: 18 2 2024
pubmed: 18 2 2024
entrez: 17 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (UHR-CT) to assess stapes and chorda tympani nerve anatomy using a deep learning (DLR), a model-based, and a hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm compared to simulated conventional CT. CT acquisitions were performed with a Mercury 4.0 phantom. Images were acquired with a 1024 × 1024 matrix and a 0.25 mm slice thickness and reconstructed using DLR, model-based, and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithms. To simulate conventional CT, images were also reconstructed with a 512 × 512 matrix and a 0.5 mm slice thickness. Spatial resolution, noise power spectrum, and objective high-contrast detectability were compared. Three radiologists evaluated the clinical acceptability of these algorithms by assessing the thickness and image quality of the stapes footplate and superstructure elements, as well as the image quality of the chorda tympani nerve bony and tympanic segments using a 5-point confidence scale on 13 temporal bone CT examinations reconstructed with the four algorithms. UHR-CT provided higher spatial resolution than simulated conventional CT at the penalty of higher noise. DLR and model-based iterative reconstruction provided better noise reduction than hybrid iterative reconstruction, and DLR had the highest detectability index, regardless of the dose level. All stapedial structure thicknesses were thinner using UHR-CT by comparison with conventional simulated CT (P < 0.009). DLR showed the best visualization scores compared to the other reconstruction algorithms (P < 0.032). UHR-CT with DLR results in less noise than UHR-CT with hybrid iterative reconstruction and significantly improves stapes and tympanic chorda tympani nerve depiction compared to simulated conventional CT and UHR-CT with iterative reconstruction.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38368178
pii: S2211-5684(24)00036-6
doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2024.02.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest Two authors in this work, A.B. and P.A.G.T., are involved in a non-remunerated research contract with Canon Medical Systems. K. H. works as a CT clinical research scientist for Canon Medical Systems Corporation.

Auteurs

Achille Beysang (A)

Guilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France.

Nicolas Villani (N)

Guilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France.

Fatma Boubaker (F)

Guilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France.

Ulysse Puel (U)

Guilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, INSERM, IADI, 54000, Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, CIC, Innovation Technologique, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France.

Michael Eliezer (M)

Department of Radiology, Hôpital Lariboisière, AP-HP, 75010 Paris, France.

Gabriela Hossu (G)

Université de Lorraine, INSERM, IADI, 54000, Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, CIC, Innovation Technologique, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France.

Karim Haioun (K)

Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Kawasaki-shi, 212-0015 Kanagawa, Japan.

Alain Blum (A)

Guilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, INSERM, IADI, 54000, Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, CIC, Innovation Technologique, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France.

Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira (PAG)

Guilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, INSERM, IADI, 54000, Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, CIC, Innovation Technologique, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France.

Cécile Parietti-Winkler (C)

ENT Surgery Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 54000 Nancy, France.

Romain Gillet (R)

Guilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, INSERM, IADI, 54000, Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, CIC, Innovation Technologique, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France. Electronic address: r.gillet@chru-nancy.fr.

Classifications MeSH