Diatom-mediated food web functioning under ocean artificial upwelling.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 27 10 2023
accepted: 12 02 2024
medline: 18 2 2024
pubmed: 18 2 2024
entrez: 17 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Enhancing ocean productivity by artificial upwelling is evaluated as a nature-based solution for food security and climate change mitigation. Fish production is intended through diatom-based plankton food webs as these are assumed to be short and efficient. However, our findings from mesocosm experiments on artificial upwelling in the oligotrophic ocean disagree with this classical food web model. Here, diatoms did not reduce trophic length and instead impaired the transfer of primary production to crustacean grazers and small pelagic fish. The diatom-driven decrease in trophic efficiency was likely mediated by changes in nutritional value for the copepod grazers. Whilst diatoms benefitted the availability of essential fatty acids, they also caused unfavorable elemental compositions via high carbon-to-nitrogen ratios (i.e. low protein content) to which the grazers were unable to adapt. This nutritional imbalance for grazers was most pronounced in systems optimized for CO

Identifiants

pubmed: 38368496
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54345-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-54345-w
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3955

Subventions

Organisme : Horizon 2020
ID : 695094
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
ID : 03F0897A

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Prentice, A. M. Starvation in humans: Evolutionary background and contemporary implications. Mech. Ageing Dev. 126, 976–981 (2005).
pubmed: 15907972 doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2005.03.018
Godfray, H. C. J. et al. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812–818 (2010).
pubmed: 20110467 doi: 10.1126/science.1185383
Fuhrman, J. et al. Food-energy-water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5°C future. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 920–927 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41558-020-0876-z
Duarte, C. M. et al. Will the oceans help feed humanity?. Bioscience 59, 967–976 (2009).
doi: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.8
Hicks, C. C. et al. Harnessing global fisheries to tackle micronutrient deficiencies. Nature 574, 95–98 (2019).
pubmed: 31554969 doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1592-6
Pan, Y. W. et al. Research progress in artificial upwelling and its potential environmental effects. Sci. China-Earth Sci. 59, 236–248 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s11430-015-5195-2
Baumann, M. et al. Effect of intensity and mode of artificial upwelling on particle flux and carbon export. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 1579 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.742142
Gattuso, J.-P. et al. The potential for ocean-based climate action: Negative emissions technologies and beyond. Front Clim. 2, 37 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fclim.2020.575716
Gao, G. et al. A review of existing and potential blue carbon contributions to climate change mitigation in the Anthropocene. J. Appl. Ecol. 59, 1686–1699 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.14173
Baumann, M. et al. Counteracting effects of nutrient composition (Si: N) on export flux under artificial upwelling. Front. Mar. Sci. 10, 1084 (2023).
doi: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1181351
Jürchott, M., Oschlies, A. & Koeve, W. Artificial upwelling—A refined narrative. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2022GL101870 (2023).
doi: 10.1029/2022GL101870
Ryther, J. H. Photosynthesis and fish production in the sea. Science 166, 72–76 (1969).
pubmed: 5817762 doi: 10.1126/science.166.3901.72
Uitz, J. et al. Phytoplankton class-specific primary production in the world’s oceans: Seasonal and interannual variability from satellite observations. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycle https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003680 (2010).
doi: 10.1029/2009GB003680
Hansen, B., Bjornsen, P. K. & Hansen, P. J. The size ratio between planktonic predators and their prey. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39, 395–403 (1994).
doi: 10.4319/lo.1994.39.2.0395
Sommer, U. et al. Pelagic food web configurations at different levels of nutrient richness and their implications for the ratio fish production: Primary production. Hydrobiologia 484, 11–20 (2002).
doi: 10.1023/A:1021340601986
Eddy, T. D. et al. Energy flow through marine ecosystems: Confronting transfer efficiency. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 76–86 (2021).
pubmed: 33097289 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.09.006
Cury, P. et al. Small pelagics in upwelling systems: Patterns of interaction and structural changes in “wasp-waist” ecosystems. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57, 603–618 (2000).
doi: 10.1006/jmsc.2000.0712
Chavez, F. P. & Messie, M. A comparison of eastern boundary upwelling ecosystems. Prog. Oceanogr. 83, 80–96 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.032
Goldenberg, S. U. et al. Nutrient composition (Si:N) as driver of plankton communities during artificial upwelling. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, 1015188 (2022).
doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.1015188
Ortiz, J. et al. Artificial upwelling in singular and recurring mode: Consequences for net community production and metabolic balance. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 1976 (2022).
doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.743105
Ban, S. H. et al. The paradox of diatom-copepod interactions. Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser. 157, 287–293 (1997).
doi: 10.3354/meps157287
Saiz, E. & Calbet, A. Copepod feeding in the ocean: Scaling patterns, composition of their diet and the bias of estimates due to microzooplankton grazing during incubations. Hydrobiologia 666, 181–196 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s10750-010-0421-6
Decima, M. & Landry, M. R. Resilience of plankton trophic structure to an eddy-stimulated diatom bloom in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser. 643, 33–48 (2020).
doi: 10.3354/meps13333
Sarthou, G. et al. Growth physiology and fate of diatoms in the ocean: A review. J. Sea Res. 53, 25–42 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2004.01.007
Pancic, M. et al. Silicified cell walls as a defensive trait in diatoms. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 286, 9 (2019).
Ianora, A. & Miralto, A. Toxigenic effects of diatoms on grazers, phytoplankton and other microbes: A review. Ecotoxicology 19, 493–511 (2010).
pubmed: 19924531 doi: 10.1007/s10646-009-0434-y
Lundholm, N. et al. Induction of domoic acid production in diatoms-Types of grazers and diatoms are important. Harmful Algae 79, 64–73 (2018).
pubmed: 30420018 doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2018.06.005
Jonasdottir, S. H. Fatty acid profiles and production in marine phytoplankton. Mar. Drugs 17, 20 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/md17030151
Sauterey, B. & Ward, B. Environmental control of marine phytoplankton stoichiometry in the North Atlantic Ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 119, e2114602118 (2022).
pubmed: 34949718 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2114602118
Thomas, P. K. et al. Elemental and biochemical nutrient limitation of zooplankton: A meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 25, 2776–2792 (2022).
pubmed: 36223425 doi: 10.1111/ele.14125
Mojica, K. D. A. et al. Phytoplankton community structure in relation to vertical stratification along a north-south gradient in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean. Limnol. Oceanogr. 60, 1498–1521 (2015).
doi: 10.1002/lno.10113
Armengol, L. et al. Planktonic food web structure and trophic transfer efficiency along a productivity gradient in the tropical and subtropical Atlantic Ocean. Sci. Rep. 9, 19 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38507-9
Gillooly, J. F. Effect of body size and temperature on generation time in zooplankton. J. Plankton Res. 22, 241–251 (2000).
doi: 10.1093/plankt/22.2.241
Turner, J. T. Zooplankton fecal pellets, marine snow, phytodetritus and the ocean’s biological pump. Prog. Oceanogr. 130, 205–248 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2014.08.005
Treguer, P. et al. Influence of diatom diversity on the ocean biological carbon pump. Nat. Geosci. 11, 27–37 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41561-017-0028-x
Ortiz, J. et al. Oligotrophic phytoplankton community effectively adjusts to artificial upwelling regardless of intensity, but differently among upwelling modes. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.880550 (2022).
doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.880550
Ortiz, J. et al. Phytoplankton physiology and functional traits under artificial upwelling with varying Si:N. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1319875 (2024).
doi: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1319875
Spilling, K. et al. Microzooplankton communities and their grazing of phytoplankton under artificial upwelling in the oligotrophic ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1286899 (2023).
doi: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1286899
Moore, C. M. et al. Processes and patterns of oceanic nutrient limitation. Nat. Geosci. 6, 701–710 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/ngeo1765
Persson, J. et al. To be or not to be what you eat: Regulation of stoichiometric homeostasis among autotrophs and heterotrophs. Oikos 119, 741–751 (2010).
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.18545.x
Hessen, D. O. et al. Ecological stoichiometry: An elementary approach using basic principles. Limnol. Oceanogr. 58, 2219–2236 (2013).
doi: 10.4319/lo.2013.58.6.2219
Sherr, E. B. & Sherr, B. F. Heterotrophic dinoflagellates: A significant component of microzooplankton biomass and major grazers of diatoms in the sea. Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser. 352, 187–197 (2007).
doi: 10.3354/meps07161
Stoecker, D. K. & Capuzzo, J. M. Predation on protozoa—Its importance to zooplankton. J. Plankton Res. 12, 891–908 (1990).
doi: 10.1093/plankt/12.5.891
Kiorboe, T. How zooplankton feed: Mechanisms, traits and trade-offs. Biol. Rev. 86, 311–339 (2011).
pubmed: 20682007 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00148.x
Hessen, D. O. et al. Carbon, sequestration in ecosystems: The role of stoichiometry. Ecology 85, 1179–1192 (2004).
doi: 10.1890/02-0251
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.
Martiny, A. C. et al. Regional variation in the particulate organic carbon to nitrogen ratio in the surface ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycle 27, 723–731 (2013).
doi: 10.1002/gbc.20061
Robinson, C. et al. Mesopelagic zone ecology and biogeochemistry—A synthesis. Deep-Sea Res. II-Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 57, 1504–1518 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.02.018
Anderson, T. R. et al. Metabolic stoichiometry and the fate of excess carbon and nutrients in consumers. Am. Nat. 165, 1–15 (2005).
pubmed: 15729636 doi: 10.1086/426598
Lee, R. F., Hagen, W. & Kattner, G. Lipid storage in marine zooplankton. Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser. 307, 273–306 (2006).
doi: 10.3354/meps307273
Teuber, L. et al. Who is who in the tropical Atlantic? Functional traits, ecophysiological adaptations and life strategies in tropical calanoid copepods. Prog. Oceanogr. 171, 128–135 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2018.12.006
Smith, M. D., Knapp, A. K. & Collins, S. L. A framework for assessing ecosystem dynamics in response to chronic resource alterations induced by global change. Ecology 90, 3279–3289 (2009).
pubmed: 20120798 doi: 10.1890/08-1815.1
Litchman, E., Ohman, M. D. & Kiorboe, T. Trait-based approaches to zooplankton communities. J. Plankton Res. 35, 473–484 (2013).
doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbt019
Griscom, B. W. et al. Natural climate solutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114, 11645–11650 (2017).
pubmed: 29078344 pmcid: 5676916 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710465114
Wu, J. J., Keller, D. P. & Oschlies, A. Carbon dioxide removal via macroalgae open-ocean mariculture and sinking: an Earth system modeling study. Earth Syst. Dyn. 14, 185–221 (2023).
doi: 10.5194/esd-14-185-2023
Taucher, J. et al. Enhanced silica export in a future ocean triggers global diatom decline. Nature 605, 696–700 (2022).
pubmed: 35614245 pmcid: 9132771 doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04687-0
Bach, L. T. et al. Effects of elevated CO
doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00075
Hernandez-Leon, S. Annual cycle of epiplanktonic copepods in Canary Island waters. Fish Oceanogr. 7, 252–257 (1998).
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2419.1998.00071.x
Turner, J. T. The importance of small planktonic copepods and their roles in pelagic marine food webs. Zool. Stud. 43, 255–266 (2004).
Higgins, H. W., Wright, S. W. & Schluter, L. Quantitative interpretation of chemotaxonomic pigment data. In Phytoplankton Pigments: Characterization, Chemotaxonomy and Applications in Oceanography (eds Roy, S. et al.) (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
Krock, B. et al. LC-MS-MS aboard ship: Tandem mass spectrometry in the search for phycotoxins and novel toxigenic plankton from the North Sea. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 392, 797–803 (2008).
pubmed: 18584156 doi: 10.1007/s00216-008-2221-7
Putt, M. & Stoecker, D. K. An experimentally determined carbon—Volume ratio for marine oligotrichous ciliates from estuarine and coastal waters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 34, 1097–1103 (1989).
doi: 10.4319/lo.1989.34.6.1097
Menden-Deuer, S. & Lessard, E. J. Carbon to volume relationships for dinoflagellates, diatoms, and other protist plankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 45, 569–579 (2000).
doi: 10.4319/lo.2000.45.3.0569
McCutchan, J. H. et al. Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope ratios of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur. Oikos 102, 378–390 (2003).
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12098.x
Dorner, I. et al. Ocean acidification impacts on biomass and fatty acid composition of a post-bloom marine plankton community. Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser. 647, 49–64 (2020).
doi: 10.3354/meps13390
R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ .

Auteurs

Silvan Urs Goldenberg (SU)

Biological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany. sgoldenberg@geomar.de.

Carsten Spisla (C)

Biological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Nicolás Sánchez (N)

Biological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Jan Taucher (J)

Biological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Kristian Spilling (K)

Marine and Freshwater Solutions, Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
Centre for Coastal Research, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.

Michael Sswat (M)

Biological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Anna Fiesinger (A)

Biological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Mar Fernández-Méndez (M)

Biological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany.

Bernd Krock (B)

Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany.

Helena Hauss (H)

Biological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Mekjarvik, Norway.

Jacqueline Haussmann (J)

Biological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Ulf Riebesell (U)

Biological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Classifications MeSH