Building Semipermeable Films One Monomer at a Time: Structural Advantages via Molecular Layer Deposition vs Interfacial Polymerization.


Journal

Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society
ISSN: 0897-4756
Titre abrégé: Chem Mater
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9884133

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 03 10 2023
revised: 29 12 2023
accepted: 02 01 2024
medline: 19 2 2024
pubmed: 19 2 2024
entrez: 19 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Molecular layer deposition (MLD) provides the opportunity to perform condensation polymerization one vaporized monomer at a time for the creation of precise, selective nanofilms for desalination membranes. Here, we compare the structure, chemistry, and morphology of two types of commercial interfacial polymerzation (IP) membranes with lab-made MLD films. M-phenylenediamine (MPD) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC) produced a cross-linked, aromatic polyamide often used in reverse osmosis membranes at MLD growth rates of 2.9 Å/cycle at 115 °C. Likewise, piperazine (PIP) and TMC formed polypiperazine amide, a common selective layer in nanofiltration membranes, with MLD growth rates of 1.5 Å/cycle at 115 °C. Ellipsometry and X-ray reflectivity results suggest that the surface of the MLD films is comprised of polymer segments roughly two monomers in length, which are connected at one end to the cross-linked bulk layer. As a result of this structure as well as the triple-functionality of TMC, MPD-TMC had a temperature window of stable growth rate from 115 to 150 °C, which is unlike any non-cross-linked MLD chemistries reported in the literature. Compared to IP films, corresponding MLD films were denser and morphologically conformal, which suggests a reduction in void volumes; this explains the high degree of salt rejection and reduced flux previously observed for exceptionally thin MPD-TMC MLD membranes. Using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and infrared spectroscopy, MLD PIP-TMC films evidenced a completely cross-linked internal structure, which lacked amine and carboxyl groups, pointing to a hydrophobic bulk structure, ideal for optimized water flux. Grazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering showed broad features in each polyamide with

Identifiants

pubmed: 38370278
doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c02519
pmc: PMC10870709
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1362-1374

Informations de copyright

© 2024 American Chemical Society.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Auteurs

Brian C Welch (BC)

Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel.
University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.

Emma N Antonio (EN)

University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.

Thomas P Chaney (TP)

University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.

Olivia M McIntee (OM)

University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.

Joseph Strzalka (J)

Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States.

Victor M Bright (VM)

University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.

Alan R Greenberg (AR)

University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.

Tamar Segal-Peretz (T)

Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel.

Michael Toney (M)

University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.

Steven M George (SM)

University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.

Classifications MeSH