Development and Usability of an Inexpensive and Reusable Phantom for Ultrasound-Guided Needle Cannulation.

anesthesiology emergency medicine peripheral vein catheter simulation trainer ultrasound guided ultrasound phantom

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Historique:
accepted: 19 01 2024
medline: 19 2 2024
pubmed: 19 2 2024
entrez: 19 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Introduction Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter placement (UG-PVCP) is a key skill for establishing intravenous access, especially in patients with anatomical challenges. Ultrasound is highly operator-dependent, and it is essential to ensure a sufficient level of competence when educating healthcare professionals. Competence can be acquired through simulation-based training (SBT) using phantoms or simulators. We developed a phantom for SBT, and in this study, we explore the phantom's usability and technical fidelity. Methods Novices with no experience in UG-PVCP and experts who routinely performed the procedure were asked to perform three ultrasound-guided catheter placement attempts on the phantom. Afterward, they were asked to complete a usability questionnaire consisting of 14 questions exploring the usability and fidelity of the phantom. Results Fifty-seven participants were included in the study: 29 novices and 28 experts. When assessing positive questions about the frequency of use, ease of use, integration of functionality, quickness to learn, and confidence level, the study showed a median score of 4 to 5 out of 5 in the two groups. The median was 1 to 2 out of 5 for negative questions assessing cumbersomeness, unnecessary complexity, and model inconsistency. In an additional comment textbox, one participant mentioned that the cannulation did not feel realistic but that it was good for cannulation practice. Conclusions We believe the phantom is suitable for an educational curriculum since it shows a high level of usability, scoring high on positive questions while scoring low on negative questions, and having high functional fidelity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38371073
doi: 10.7759/cureus.52583
pmc: PMC10874636
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e52583

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024, Linnet et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Jacob Linnet (J)

Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, DNK.
Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DNK.

Magnús P Obinah (MP)

Plastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, DNK.

Mikkel H Madsen (MH)

Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, DNK.

Magnus M Møller (MM)

Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, DNK.

Lene Russell (L)

Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, DNK.

Kim Ekelund (K)

Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, DNK.
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet Hospital, Copenhagen, DNK.

Morten B Svendsen (MB)

Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, DNK.
Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DNK.

Ebbe Thinggaard (E)

Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, DNK.
Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DNK.

Classifications MeSH