Myelofibrosis: Current unmet needs, emerging treatments, and future perspectives.

clinical end points combination therapy disease modification essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis polycythemia vera unmet need

Journal

Cancer
ISSN: 1097-0142
Titre abrégé: Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0374236

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Feb 2024
Historique:
medline: 19 2 2024
pubmed: 19 2 2024
entrez: 19 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The current standard-of-care for treatment of myelofibrosis (MF) comprises inhibitors of the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducers and activators (STAT) pathway; however, despite their ability to alleviate symptoms, they do not appear to modify underlying disease and have not demonstrated substantial survival benefit. Allogeneic-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative option for patients with MF but is limited to a subset of high-risk and fit patients. Early disease modification could positively affect disease trajectory for lower risk patients with MF as well as those with conditions that can precede MF, such as polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Here, the authors discuss critical unmet needs in the MF treatment paradigm, including: the need for safe, impactful therapies for lower risk patients, thus allowing intervention when success is most likely; better development of first-line therapies (likely highly novel or combination strategies) for intermediate-risk/higher risk patients; and approved drugs to manage cytopenia. Finally, a consensus definition of disease modification is needed that informs trial design, allowing the development of clinical end points that enable understanding of therapies and responses and that facilitate the development of therapies that work according to this definition. Through close collaboration between clinicians, patients, and the pharmaceutical industry, better efforts to define benefit and identify patients most likely to benefit from a particular combination or treatment strategy should enable the development of more effective and safe treatments to extend and improve quality of life for patients with MF.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38373144
doi: 10.1002/cncr.35244
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : AbbVie

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.

Références

Harrison CN, Schaap N, Mesa RA. Management of myelofibrosis after ruxolitinib failure. Ann Hematol. 2020;99(6):1177-1191. doi:10.1007/s00277-020-04002-9
de Freitas RM, da Costa Maranduba CM. Myeloproliferative neoplasms and the JAK/STAT signaling pathway: an overview. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2015;37(5):348-353. doi:10.1016/j.bjhh.2014.10.001
Pemmaraju N, Verstovsek S, Mesa R, et al. Defining disease modification in myelofibrosis in the era of targeted therapy. Cancer. 2022;128(13):2420-2432. doi:10.1002/cncr.34205
Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2021;96(1):145-162. doi:10.1002/ajh.26050
Baumeister J, Chatain N, Sofias AM, Lammers T, Koschmieder S. Progression of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN): diagnostic and therapeutic perspectives. Cells. 2021;10(12):3551. doi:10.3390/cells10123551
Passamonti F, Kiladjian JJ, Vannucchi AM, et al. ReTHINK: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 study of ruxolitinib in early myelofibrosis patients [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(15 suppl l):TPS7080. doi:10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.tps7080
Harrison CN, Nangalia J, Boucher R, et al. Ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for polycythemia vera intolerant or resistant to hydroxycarbamide in a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(19);3534-3544. doi:10.1200/JCO.22.01935
Gunawan A, Harrington P, Garcia-Curto N, McLornan D, Radia D, Harrison C. Ruxolitinib for the treatment of essential thrombocythemia. Hemasphere. 2018;2(4):e56. doi:10.1097/hs9.0000000000000056
Mascarenhas J, Kremyanskaya M, Patriarca A, et al. MPN-375 BET inhibitor pelabresib (CPI-0610) combined with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis-JAK inhibitor-naive or with suboptimal response to ruxolitinib-preliminary data from the MANIFEST study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022;22(suppl 2):S335-S336. doi:10.1016/s2152-2650(22)01456-2
Yacoub A, Borate U, Rampal RK, et al. MPN-075 Efficacy and safety of add-on parsaclisib to ruxolitinib therapy in myelofibrosis patients with low versus higher baseline platelet counts: a subgroup analysis of data from a phase 2 study [abstract]. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022;22(suppl):S324. doi:10.1016/S2152-2650(22)01433-1
Harrison CN, Garcia JS, Somervaille TCP, et al. Addition of navitoclax to ongoing ruxolitinib therapy for patients with myelofibrosis with progression or suboptimal response: phase II safety and efficacy. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(15):1671-1680. doi:10.1200/jco.21.02188
Pemmaraju N, Garcia JS, Potluri J, et al. Addition of navitoclax to ongoing ruxolitinib treatment in patients with myelofibrosis (REFINE): a post-hoc analysis of molecular biomarkers in a phase 2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2022;9(6):e434-e444. doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00116-8
Kiladjian JJ, Ianotto JC, Soret J, et al. Final results of Ruxopeg, a phase 1/2 adaptive randomized trial of ruxolitinib (rux) and pegylated interferon alpha (IFNa) 2a in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Blood. 2022;140(suppl 1):577-578. doi:10.1182/blood-2022-156389
Stegelmann F, Jahn E, Koschmieder S, et al. P1055: Clinical and genetic results of the phase Ib/II trial MPNSG-0212: ruxolitinib plus pomalidomide in myelofibrosis with anemia [abstract]. Hemasphere. 2022;6(suppl l):945-946. doi:10.1097/01.hs9.0000847088.09306.08
Gerds AT, Vannucchi AM, Passamonti F, et al. A phase 2 study of luspatercept in patients with myelofibrosis-associated anemia [abstract]. Blood. 2019;134(suppl 1):557. doi:10.1182/blood-2019-122546
Passamonti F, Foran JM, Tandra A, et al. The combination of navitoclax and ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor-naive patients with myelofibrosis mediates responses suggestive of disease modification [abstract]. Blood. 2022;140(Suppl 1):583-585. doi:10.1182/blood-2022-157949
Mascarenhas J, Harrison CN, Kiladjian JJ, et al. Imetelstat in intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis refractory to JAK inhibitor: IMpactMF phase III study design. Future Oncol. 2022;18(22):2393-2402. doi:10.2217/fon-2022-0235
Reis E, Buonpane R, Celik H, et al. Discovery of INCA033989, a monoclonal antibody that selectively antagonizes mutant calreticulin oncogenic function in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) [abstract]. Blood. 2022;140(suppl 1):14-15. doi:10.1182/blood-2022-159435
Ryou H, Sirinukunwattana K, Aberdeen A, et al. Continuous indexing of fibrosis (CIF): improving the assessment and classification of MPN patients. Leukemia. 2023;37(2):348-358. doi:10.1038/s41375-022-01773-0
Masarova L, Bose P, Pemmaraju N, et al. Clinical significance of bone marrow blast percentage in patients with myelofibrosis and the effect of ruxolitinib therapy. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021;21(5):318-327. doi:10.1016/j.clml.2020.12.024
Bose P. Myelofibrosis with cytopenias [abstract]. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017;17(suppl 2):S30-S31. doi:10.1016/j.clml.2017.08.018
Verstovsek S. Therapeutic potential of JAK2 inhibitors. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2009;2009(1):636-642. doi:10.1182/asheducation-2009.1.636
Verstovsek S, Gotlib J, Gupta V, et al. Management of cytopenias in patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib and effect of dose modifications on efficacy outcomes. Onco Targets Ther. 2013;7:13-21. doi:10.2147/ott.s53348
Bělohlávková P, Maisnar V, Voglová J, Buchler T, Žák P. Improvement of anaemia in patients with primary myelofibrosis by low-dose thalidomide and prednisone. Acta Med. 2016;59(2):50-53. doi:10.14712/18059694.2016.89
Bose P, Verstovsek S. Management of myelofibrosis-related cytopenias. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2018;13(3):164-172. doi:10.1007/s11899-018-0447-9
Verstovsek S, Gerds AT, Vannucchi AM, et al. Momelotinib versus danazol in symptomatic patients with anaemia and myelofibrosis (MOMENTUM): results from an international, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2023;401(10373):269-280. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02036-0
Oh ST, Mesa RA, Harrison CN, et al. Pacritinib is a potent ACVR1 inhibitor with significant anemia benefit in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood Adv. 2023;7(19):5835-5842. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010151

Auteurs

Claire N Harrison (CN)

Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Jean-Jacques Kiladjian (JJ)

Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Steffen Koschmieder (S)

Department of Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Center of Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Aachen, Germany.

Francesco Passamonti (F)

Dipartimento di Oncologia ed Ematologia, Università degli Studi di Milano, Policlinico di Milano, Ospedale Maggiore, Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda, Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH