[Maternal deaths and management by emergency departments in France 2016-2018].

Mortalité maternelle et prise en charge par les services d’urgence en France 2016-2018.
Arrêt cardiaque Cardiac arrest Cardiopulmonary arrest Emergency Medical Assistance System Emergency department Emergency medicine Maternal mortality Mobile Emergency and Resuscitation Services Mortalité maternelle Médecine d’urgence SAMU SMUR Service d’accueil des urgences

Journal

Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie
ISSN: 2468-7189
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101693805

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 13 02 2024
accepted: 13 02 2024
medline: 20 2 2024
pubmed: 20 2 2024
entrez: 19 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In France, 272 maternal deaths occurred during the period 2016-2018, of which 131 were initially treated by healthcare professionals not specialized in obstetric. Fifty-six files were excluded because they did not concern emergency services or because there was insufficient data to allow analysis. Seventy-five cases of maternal deaths initially treated by emergency services (in-hospital emergency department (ED) or emergency medical ambulance (SAMU)) were analyzed. Fifty-six cases were treated by the SAMU and 22 by an ED (both in 3 cases). The causes of death were 20 cardiovascular events, 18 pulmonary embolisms, 9 neurological failures and 8 hemorrhagic shocks. The event occurred during pregnancy in 48 cases (64%) and during per or postpartum period in 27 cases (36%). The motivations for consultation at the ED were mainly pain (n = 9), respiratory distress (n = 6) or faintness (n = 3). The reasons for calling emergency dispatching service (SAMU) were cardiorespiratory arrest in 32 cases (57%) and neurological failure (coma or status epilepticus) in 6 cases (11%). Among the 56 patients treated outside the hospital, 17 died on scene and 39 were transported to a resuscitation room (n = 13), a specialized department (n = 13), an obstetrics department (n = 8) and less often in the ED (n =2). This was considered appropriate in 35 out of 39 cases (90%). Concerning the 75 files analyzed (ED and SAMU), death was considered unavoidable in 37 cases (49%) and potentially avoidable in 29 cases (38%) (maybe = 23, probably = 6). Avoidability could not be established in 9 cases. Among the 29 potentially avoidable deaths (38%), one of the criteria of avoidability concerned emergency services in 14 cases (ED = 9, SAMU/SMUR = 5, 18% of the files studied). ED's cares were considered optimal in 11 cases (50%) and non-optimal in 11 cases (50%). SAMU's cares were considered optimal in 45 cases (80%).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38373488
pii: S2468-7189(24)00047-3
doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2024.02.008
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

English Abstract Journal Article

Langues

fre

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Auteurs

Mathias Rossignol (M)

Département d'anesthésie-réanimation et SMUR, hôpital Lariboisière, AP-HP, 2 rue Ambroise-Paré, 75465 Paris, France. Electronic address: mathias.rossignol@aphp.fr.

Eric Verspyck (E)

Service de Gynécologie et Obstétrique, CHU de Rouen, 1, rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France.

Marie Jonard (M)

Service de Réanimation médicochirurgicale, CH de Lens, 99 route de la Basse, 62307 Lens, France.

Classifications MeSH