Application and accuracy of the EAPC/IASP diagnostic algorithm for neuropathic cancer pain and quantitative sensory testing profile in patients with pain due to cancer.
Cancer pain
Diagnostic algorithm
NeuPSIG criteria
Neuropathic cancer pain
Quantitative sensory testing
Somatosensory profiling
Journal
Pain reports
ISSN: 2471-2531
Titre abrégé: Pain Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101683899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
28
09
2023
revised:
21
12
2023
accepted:
26
12
2023
medline:
20
2
2024
pubmed:
20
2
2024
entrez:
20
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Better diagnosis and treatment of neuropathic cancer pain (NcP) remains an unmet clinical need. The EAPC/IASP algorithm was specifically designed for NcP diagnosis; yet, to date, there is no information on its application and accuracy. Our aim was to determine the accuracy of the EAPC/IASP algorithm compared with the Neuropathic Special Interest Group grading system (gold standard) and to describe patients' sensory profile with quantitative sensory testing (QST). This is a cross-sectional observational study conducted in a palliative care and pain outpatient clinic. Patients with cancer pain intensity ≥3 (numerical rating scale 0-10) were eligible. The palliative care physician applied the EAPC/IASP algorithm as a grading system to diagnose probable or definite NcP, and an independent investigator applied the gold standard and performed the QST. Sensitivity and specificity of the EAPC/IASP algorithm were measured in comparison with the gold standard results. Kruskal-Wallis and unequal variance independent-samples Ninety-eight patients were enrolled from August 2020 to March 2023. Sensitivity and specificity for the EAPC/IASP algorithm were 85% (95% CI 70.2-94.3) and 98.3% (95% CI 90.8-100), respectively. Patients with NcP in contrast to patients without NcP showed cold hypoesthesia ( The results indicate a good performance of the EAPC/IASP algorithm in diagnosing NcP and the QST discriminated well between patients with and without NcP.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38375093
doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001140
pii: PAINREPORTS-D-23-0135
pmc: PMC10876233
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e1140Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
E.Z. has received honoraria from Amgen. R.R. has received fees as a speaker or for counseling services from the following companies: Aristo Pharma, Cannamedical, Hormosan, Grünenthal, Lilly & Company, Pfizer, Tilray, and Spectrum Therapeutics. S.K. has received honoraria from Nutricia Norge AS and Pfizer Norge AS. A.C. has received honoraria from Molteni, Pfizer/Eli Lilly Italia Spa, and Mundipharma. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.