Misconceptions and do-not-resuscitate preferences of healthcare professionals commonly involved in cardiopulmonary resuscitations: A national survey.
Cardiac arrest
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
End-of-life care
Ethics
Personal preferences
Shared decision-making
Journal
Resuscitation plus
ISSN: 2666-5204
Titre abrégé: Resusc Plus
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101774410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
20
10
2023
revised:
29
01
2024
accepted:
31
01
2024
medline:
20
2
2024
pubmed:
20
2
2024
entrez:
20
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To assess the DNR preferences of critical care-, anesthesia- and emergency medicine practitioners, to identify factors influencing decision-making, and to raise awareness for misconceptions concerning CPR outcomes. A nationwide multicenter survey was conducted in Switzerland confronting healthcare professionals with a case vignette of an adult patient with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The primary outcome was the rate of DNR Code Status vs. CPR Code Status when taking the perspective from a clinical case vignette of a 70-year-old patient. Secondary outcomes were participants' personal preferences for DNR and estimates of survival with good neurological outcome after in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Within 1803 healthcare professionals, DNR code status was preferred in 85% ( The estimation of outcomes following cardiac arrest and personal living conditions are pivotal factors influencing code status preferences in healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals should be aware of cardiac arrest prognosis and potential implications of personal preferences when engaging in code status- and end-of-life discussions with patients and their relatives.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38375442
doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100575
pii: S2666-5204(24)00026-2
pmc: PMC10875294
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100575Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The authors disclose no potential conflict of interest relevant to this study. Simon Amacher has received grants from the Mach-Gaensslen Foundation Switzerland and the Nora van Meeuwen-Haefliger Foundation of the University of Basel, Switzerland outside the present work. Raoul Sutter has received research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (No. 320030_169379), the Research Fund of the University of Basel, the Scientific Society Basel, and the Gottfried Julia Bangerter- Rhyner Foundation. Sabina Hunziker was supported by the Gottfried Julia Bangerter- Rhyner Foundation, the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) and the Swiss Society of General Internal Medicine (SSGIM) during the conduct of the study. Grant References 10001C_192850/1 and 10531C_182422.