Do pelvic floor muscle function parameters differ in women according to continence status? A systematic review.

Muscle function Pelvic floor muscle Urinary incontinence Women

Journal

The French journal of urology
ISSN: 2950-3930
Titre abrégé: Fr J Urol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9918752079106676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 21 10 2023
revised: 18 01 2024
accepted: 28 01 2024
medline: 20 2 2024
pubmed: 20 2 2024
entrez: 20 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Current literature highlights the difficulty in identifying which pelvic floor muscle (PFM) functions are correlated with urinary incontinence (UI). In this study, we compared parameters of PFM function (strength, endurance, tone, control, reaction, and/or coordination) according to continence status in women (presence or absence, type and/or severity of urinary incontinence). A systematic review was conducted following the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Three databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, and LiSSa) were searched from inception to December 31, 2021. Assessment of risk of bias was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. The initial research yielded 4733 studies. Forty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, including 4015 participants. No statistical association was found between PFM function and the presence or absence of UI, the different type of UI or the different levels of severity of UI. The heterogeneity in methodologies and analyzes of the results only with the P-value are important limitations of this review. It appears that muscle function is not always associated with presence or absence of UI. No association is found between PFM function and type or severity of UI. These results reinforce the need to carry out a bio-psycho-social evaluation of UI that does not only focus on PFM functions. As such, the results reported herein can be considered a resource for more specific research.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Current literature highlights the difficulty in identifying which pelvic floor muscle (PFM) functions are correlated with urinary incontinence (UI).
AIM OBJECTIVE
In this study, we compared parameters of PFM function (strength, endurance, tone, control, reaction, and/or coordination) according to continence status in women (presence or absence, type and/or severity of urinary incontinence).
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION METHODS
A systematic review was conducted following the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Three databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, and LiSSa) were searched from inception to December 31, 2021. Assessment of risk of bias was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS RESULTS
The initial research yielded 4733 studies. Forty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, including 4015 participants. No statistical association was found between PFM function and the presence or absence of UI, the different type of UI or the different levels of severity of UI. The heterogeneity in methodologies and analyzes of the results only with the P-value are important limitations of this review.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
It appears that muscle function is not always associated with presence or absence of UI. No association is found between PFM function and type or severity of UI. These results reinforce the need to carry out a bio-psycho-social evaluation of UI that does not only focus on PFM functions. As such, the results reported herein can be considered a resource for more specific research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38377645
pii: S2950-3930(24)00049-4
doi: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102592
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102592

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Albane Audrain (A)

Rouen Physiotherapy Training Institute, Rouen, France. Electronic address: albane.audrain@orange.fr.

Jean Nicolas Cornu (JN)

Department of Urology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.

Gaëtan Kerdelhue (G)

Department of Biomechanical Informatics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.

Yann Combret (Y)

Physiotherapy Department, Le Havre Hospital, La Havre, France; ERPHAN, Paris-Saclay University, UVSQ, Versailles, France.

Benoit Steenstrup (B)

Department of Urology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.

Classifications MeSH