The difficulty with measuring the largest melanoma tumour diameter in sentinel lymph nodes.
EDUCATION
MELANOMA
SENTINEL NODE
Journal
Journal of clinical pathology
ISSN: 1472-4146
Titre abrégé: J Clin Pathol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376601
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Feb 2024
20 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
12
12
2023
accepted:
06
02
2024
medline:
21
2
2024
pubmed:
21
2
2024
entrez:
20
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Identification of sentinel node (SN) metastases can set the adjuvant systemic therapy indication for stage III melanoma patients. For stage IIIA patients, a 1.0 mm threshold for the largest SN tumour diameter is used. Therefore, uniform reproducible measurement of its size is crucial. At present, the number of deposits or their microanatomical sites are not part of the inclusion criteria for adjuvant treatment. The goal of the current study was to show examples of the difficulty of measuring SN melanoma tumour diameter and teach how it should be measured. Histopathological slides of SN-positive melanoma patients were retrieved using the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA). Fourteen samples with the largest SN metastasis around 1.0 mm were uploaded via tele-pathology and digitally measured by 12 pathologists to reflect current practice of measurements in challenging cases. Recommendations as educational examples were provided. Microanatomical location of melanoma metastases was 1 subcapsular, 2 parenchymal and 11 combined. The smallest and largest difference in measurements were 0.24 mm and 4.81 mm, respectively. 11/14 cases (78.6%) showed no agreement regarding the 1.0 mm cut-off. The median discrepancy for cases ≤5 deposits was 0.5 mm (range 0.24-0.60, n=3) and 2.51 mm (range 0.71-4.81, n=11) for cases with ≥6 deposits. Disconcordance in measuring SN tumour burden is correlated with the number of deposits. Awareness of this discordance in challenging cases, for example, cases with multiple small deposits, is important for clinical management. Illustrating cases to reduce differences in size measurement are provided.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38378246
pii: jcp-2023-209354
doi: 10.1136/jcp-2023-209354
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: ACJvA declares advisory board and consultancy honoraria from: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck-Pfizer, MSD Merck, Neracare, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Provectus, Sanofi, Sirius Medical and 4SC. ACJvA declares research grants from Amgen and Merck-Pfizer. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.