Occlusal equilibration and muscle activity in fixed versus removable mandibular implant supported overdenture.
Fixed prostheses
Implant supported prosthesis
Mandibular implant-supported overdenture
Muscle activity
Occlusal Equilibration
Removable overdenture
Journal
Clinical oral investigations
ISSN: 1436-3771
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Investig
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707115
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Feb 2024
21 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
31
10
2023
accepted:
13
02
2024
medline:
22
2
2024
pubmed:
21
2
2024
entrez:
21
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Single denture rehabilitated patients have negative appraisals regarding oral function, mostly associated by stability and retention issues regarding mandibular prosthetics. Therefore, this study assessed patients' occlusal equilibration, muscle activity, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) receiving milled removable or fixed mandibular implant retained prostheses. Twenty-two edentulous mandibular ridges patients were randomly distributed into two groups based on the definitive prosthesis received. Group I: Removable mandibular implant-supported overdenture, Group II: Implant retained fixed prosthesis. Occlusal equilibration was evaluated utilizing Occlusense, muscle activity via Electromyograph (EMG) at delivery, after one, and three months. The OHRQoL was evaluated by Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP-19) before delivery and after follow-ups. Data were collected, tabulated, and analyzed, utilizing independent t-test and One-way ANOVA followed Tukey`s post-hoc test. Significance level set at P ≤ 0.05. Groups I &II showed significant improvement in occlusal equilibration, muscle activity and OHRQoL. Group II demonstrated significantly higher improvement than group I in occlusal equilibration associated with muscle activity after 1 month, and in functional limitations domain in OHRQoL questionnaire after 3 months. Implant retained mandibular prosthesis showed improvement in occlusal equilibration, muscle activity, and OHRQoL regardless of prosthesis type employed. Fixed implant-supported prosthesis revealed better outcomes than removable mandibular implant-supported overdenture concerning occlusal equilibration, muscle activity, and OHRQoL regarding functional limitations. Implant retained mandibular prosthesis is one of best treatment options for single mandibular completely edentulous patients, as dental implants improved occlusal equilibration, muscle activity, and OHRQoL.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38378935
doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05558-w
pii: 10.1007/s00784-024-05558-w
pmc: PMC10879252
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Pagination
160Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
ELsyad MA, El-Asfahani IA, Kortam SA, Mourad SI (2021) Masseter muscle activity of conventional denture, fixed prosthesis, and milled bar overdenture used for all-on-4 implant rehabilitation: a within-subject study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 23(3):408–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12987
doi: 10.1111/cid.12987
pubmed: 33604996
Akácsos SR, Kis M, Székely M, Popşor S, Dörner K (2019) Jaw relationship assessment for removable complete dentures using the t-scan computerised system - a case report. Med Pharm Rep 92(Suppl No 3S85–S90. https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-1522
Osman RB, Payne AG, Duncan W, Ma S (2013) Zirconia implants supporting overdentures: a pilot study with novel prosthodontic designs. Int J Prosthodont 26(3):277–281. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.2903
doi: 10.11607/ijp.2903
pubmed: 23626984
El Homossany MEMB, Abdallah HT (2018) Comparing implant supported mandibular overdenture with conventional complete denture regarding occlusion and disocclusion time using T scan. Egypt Dent J 64(2):1421–1430
doi: 10.21608/edj.2018.77402
Homsi G, Kumar A, Almotairy N, Wester E, Trulsson M, Grigoriadis A (2023) Assessment of masticatory function in older individuals with bimaxillary implant-supported fixed prostheses or with a natural dentition: a case-control study. J Prosthet Dent 129(6):871–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.08.023
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.08.023
pubmed: 34627612
Almotairy N, Kumar A, Grigoriadis A (2021) Effect of food hardness on chewing behavior in children. Clin Oral Invest 25(3):1203–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03425-y
doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03425-y
Sharma AJ, Nagrath R, Lahori M (2017) A comparative evaluation of chewing efficiency, masticatory bite force, and patient satisfaction between conventional denture and implant-supported mandibular overdenture: an in vivo study. J Indian Prosthodontic Soc 17(4):361–372. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_76_17
doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_76_17
Grigoriadis A, Kumar A, Åberg MK, Trulsson M (2019) Effect of sudden deprivation of sensory inputs from Periodontium on Mastication. Front NeuroSci 13:1316. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01316
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01316
pubmed: 31920486
pmcid: 6914695
Alloush NT, El-Mahrouky NA, Kabeel SM, Mostafa RR, Elwan AM, Alloush AT, Hamid E (2022) Impact of Mandibular Implant-supported overdenture on changes of Electromyographic Activity, Brain Activity, and cognitive function: a crossover study. World 13(5):442–448. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-211
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-211
Fayers PM, Machin D (2015) Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. Wiley
Roe P, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada JL (2011) Immediate loading of unsplinted implants in the anterior mandible for overdentures: 3-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26(6):1296–1302
pubmed: 22167436
Shawky A, Osama AM (2021) Comparing the effect of occlusal adjustment using T scan and articulating paper on the vertical bone height changes around dental implants supporting lower single fixed detachable hybrid prosthesis. Egypt Dent J 67(2):1583–1591
doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.64902.1527
Long H, Jian F, Sun J (2013) Mechanism, accuracy and application of T-Scan system in dentistry. J Nepal Dent Association Vol 13:52–56
Dias RAB, Rodrigues MJP, Messias AL, Guerra FADA, Manfredini D (2020) Comparison between conventional and computerised methods in the assessment of an occlusal scheme. J Rehabil 47(2):221–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12905
doi: 10.1111/joor.12905
Karan, Abrol, Sakshi Abrol (2019) T- scan – the dental advisor. Int J Appl Dent Sci 5(2):25–27
Farahat MY (2023) The effect of two different types of attachments in implant-retained complete mandibular thermoplastic overdenture on biting force. Al-Azhar J Dent Sci 26(2):139–145
doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2021.69408.1193
Gomaa AM (2019) Chewing and bite force efficiency of innovative implant assisted overdentures. Egypt Dent J 65(3):2981–2992
doi: 10.21608/edj.2019.72693
Pellizzer EP, Tonella BP, Ferraço R, Falcón-Antenucci RM, de Carvalho PS, Alves-Rezende MC (2010) Photoelastic stress analysis in screwed and cemented implant-supported dentures with external hexagon implants. J Craniofac Surg 21(4):1110–1113. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181e1b46e
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181e1b46e
pubmed: 20613577
ElSyad MA, Ibrahim AE, Nawar NHH, Belal TM (2019) Electromyographic Connectivity of Masseter Muscle with different retentive attachments for Implant overdentures in patients with atrophied Mandibular ridges: a crossover study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(5):1213–1222. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7484
doi: 10.11607/jomi.7484
pubmed: 30892293
Nejatidanesh F, Bonakdarchian H, Savabi G, Bonakdarchian M, Atash R, Savabi O (2022) Clinical performance of implant supported mandibular overdentures with cantilever bar and stud attachments: a retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 24(6):845–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13131
doi: 10.1111/cid.13131
pubmed: 36104009
Elgabry H, Eissa S, Abuheikal M, AND ORAL HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE OF PATIENTS WITH 3D PRINTED COMPLETE DENTURES VERSUS CONVENTIONAL DENTURES (2021) Int J Adv Res 9:210–221. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/13894 . DIGITAL OCCLUSAL ANALYSIS
Güzelce SE (2023) Biomechanical comparison of different framework materials in mandibular overdenture prosthesis supported with implants of different sizes: a finite element analysis. BMC Oral Health 23(1):450. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03080-1
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03080-1
Elgamal M, Askar O (2022) Chewing efficiency and masseter muscle activity of conventional dentures, implant-supported overdentures, and fixed hybrid prostheses in patients with atrophied mandibles. A cross-over study. Egypt Dent J 68(1):707–718
doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.97939.1802
Duong HY, Roccuzzo A, Stähli A, Salvi GE, Lang NP, Sculean A (2022) Oral health-related quality of life of patients rehabilitated with fixed and removable implant-supported dental prostheses. Periodontol 2000 88(1):201–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12419
doi: 10.1111/prd.12419
pubmed: 35103325
pmcid: 9304161
Brennan M, Houston F, O’Sullivan M, O’Connell B (2010) Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life outcomes of implant overdentures and fixed complete dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25(4):791–800
pubmed: 20657876
Elsyad MA, Khairallah AS (2017) Chewing efficiency and maximum bite force with different attachment systems of implant overdentures: a crossover study. Clin Oral Implants Res 28(6):677–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12861
doi: 10.1111/clr.12861
pubmed: 27118683