Comparative responses to 17 different antidepressants in major depressive disorder: Results from a 2-year long-term nation-wide population-based study emulating a randomized trial.

antidepressants drug treatment longitudinal major depressive disorder response

Journal

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica
ISSN: 1600-0447
Titre abrégé: Acta Psychiatr Scand
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370364

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Feb 2024
Historique:
revised: 17 01 2024
received: 07 12 2023
accepted: 07 02 2024
medline: 21 2 2024
pubmed: 21 2 2024
entrez: 21 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Long-term studies comparing nonresponse to antidepressants for major depressive disorder (MDD) are lacking. To present systematic population-based nation-wide register data on comparative 2-year non-response within six antidepressant drug classes and 17 different antidepressants in patients with MDD. The study included all 106,920 patients in Denmark with a first main index diagnosis of MDD at a psychiatric hospital inpatient or outpatient contact and who subsequently had a purchase of an antidepressant in the period from 1995 to 2018. Non-response to first antidepressant within a 2-year study period was defined as switch to or add-on of another antidepressant, antipsychotic medication, lithium, or hospitalization. Analyses emulated a targeted trial in populations standardized according to age, sex, socioeconomic status, and comorbidity with psychiatric and physical disorders. Compared with sertraline, there was no difference for citalopram (RR: 1.00 [95% CI: 0.98-1.02]) but fluoxetine (1.13 [95% CI: 1.10-1.17]), paroxetine (1.06 [95% CI: 1.01-1.10]) and escitalopram (1.22 [95% CI: 1.18-1.25]) were associated with higher risk ratio of non-responses. Within selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, sertraline outperformed reboxetine; within serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, venlafaxine outperformed duloxetine; within noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants, mirtazapine outperformed mianserin and within the class of other antidepressants, sertraline outperformed agomelatine and vortioxetine. Within tricyclic antidepressants, compared to amitriptyline, nortriptyline, dosulepin, and clomipramine had higher non-response, whereas there was no difference for imipramine. These analyses emulating a randomized trial of "real world" observational register-based data show that 2-year long-term non-responses to some antidepressants within six different drug classes are increased over others.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Long-term studies comparing nonresponse to antidepressants for major depressive disorder (MDD) are lacking.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
To present systematic population-based nation-wide register data on comparative 2-year non-response within six antidepressant drug classes and 17 different antidepressants in patients with MDD.
METHOD METHODS
The study included all 106,920 patients in Denmark with a first main index diagnosis of MDD at a psychiatric hospital inpatient or outpatient contact and who subsequently had a purchase of an antidepressant in the period from 1995 to 2018. Non-response to first antidepressant within a 2-year study period was defined as switch to or add-on of another antidepressant, antipsychotic medication, lithium, or hospitalization. Analyses emulated a targeted trial in populations standardized according to age, sex, socioeconomic status, and comorbidity with psychiatric and physical disorders.
RESULTS RESULTS
Compared with sertraline, there was no difference for citalopram (RR: 1.00 [95% CI: 0.98-1.02]) but fluoxetine (1.13 [95% CI: 1.10-1.17]), paroxetine (1.06 [95% CI: 1.01-1.10]) and escitalopram (1.22 [95% CI: 1.18-1.25]) were associated with higher risk ratio of non-responses. Within selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, sertraline outperformed reboxetine; within serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, venlafaxine outperformed duloxetine; within noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants, mirtazapine outperformed mianserin and within the class of other antidepressants, sertraline outperformed agomelatine and vortioxetine. Within tricyclic antidepressants, compared to amitriptyline, nortriptyline, dosulepin, and clomipramine had higher non-response, whereas there was no difference for imipramine.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
These analyses emulating a randomized trial of "real world" observational register-based data show that 2-year long-term non-responses to some antidepressants within six different drug classes are increased over others.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38379028
doi: 10.1111/acps.13673
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Lundbeck Foundation
ID : R279-2018-1145

Informations de copyright

© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, Salanti G, et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2018;391(10128):1357-1366. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32802-7
Shinohara K, Efthimiou O, Ostinelli EG, et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants in the long-term treatment of major depression: protocol for a systematic review and networkmeta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e027574. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027574
Wells KB. Treatment research at the crossroads: the scientific interface of clinical trials and effectiveness research. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156(1):5-10.
Kessing LV. Treatment options in bipolar disorder: lessons from population-based registers with focus on lithium. Curr Treat Opt Psychiatry. 2015;2:218-228.
Kessing LV, Bauer M, Nolen WA, Severus E, Goodwin GM, Geddes J. Effectiveness of maintenance therapy of lithium vs other mood stabilizers in monotherapy and in combinations: a systematic review of evidence from observational studies. Bipolar Disord. 2018;20:419-431. doi:10.1111/bdi.12623
Reed C, Novick D, Gonzalez-Pinto A, Bertsch J, Haro JM. Observational study designs for bipolar disorder - what can they tell us about treatment in acute mania? Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009;33(4):715-721.
Baldessarini RJ. Treatment research in bipolar disorder: issues and recommendations. CNS Drugs. 2002;16(11):721-729.
Hernán MA, Robins JM. Using big data to emulate a target trial when a randomized trial is not available. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183(8):758-764. doi:10.1093/aje/kwv254
Malig C. The Civil Registration System in Denmark. Technical paper No 66. 1996.
Statistics Denmark. Denmark. 2024.
Munk-Jorgensen P, Mortensen PB. The Danish psychiatric central register. Dan Med Bull. 1997;44(1):82-84.
Juel K, Helweg-Larsen K. The Danish registers of causes of death. Dan Med Bull. 1999;46:354-357.
Sundhedsstyrelsen. Guidelines for Treatment of Unipolar Disorder (Danish: Referenceprogram for Unipolar Depression Hos Voksne). 2007.
National Institute of Clinical Excellence, NICE guidelines, Management of Depression in Primary and Secondary Care. 2004. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG23
Kessing LV, Ziersen SC, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Gerds T. Response to antidepressants among patients with unipolar depression with and without comorbid epilepsy-a nation-wide population-based longitudinal study. J Affect Disord. 2022;299:1-5. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.11.046
Hernán MA, Robins JM. Causal Inference: What If. BocaRaton: Chapman & Hall/CRC. 2020.
European Medicines Agency, Science Medicines Health 2020. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-e9-r1-addendum-estimands-and-sensitivity-analysis-clinical-trials-guideline-statistical-principles-clinical-trials-step-5_en.pdf
Ozenne BMH, Scheike TH, Staerk L, Gerds TA. On the estimation of average treatment effects with right-censored time to event outcome and competing risks. Biom J. 2020;62(3):751-763. doi:10.1002/bimj.201800298
Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, Salanti G, et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;373(9665):746-758. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60046-5
Hernán MA, Wang W, Leaf DE. Target trial emulation: a framework for causal inference from observational data. JAMA. 2022;328(24):2446-2447. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.21383
Funk KA, Bostwick JR. A comparison of the risk of QT prolongation among SSRIs. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47(10):1330-1341. doi:10.1177/1060028013501994
Danish University Antidepressant Group. Citalopram: clinical effect profile in comparison with clomipramine. A controlled multicenter study. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1986;90(1):131-138. doi:10.1007/bf00172884
Danish University Antidepressant Group. Paroxetine: a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor showing better tolerance, but weaker antidepressant effect than clomipramine in a controlled multicenter study. J Affect Disord. 1990;18(4):289-299. doi:10.1016/0165-0327(90)90081-i
Mark J, Van der Laan SR. Targeted Learning: Causal Inference for Observational and Experimental Data. Vol 4. Springer; 2011.
Jakobsen JC, Katakam KK, Schou A, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus placebo in patients with major depressive disorder. A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial sequential analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):58. doi:10.1186/s12888-016-1173-2
Rådet for Anvendelse af Dyr Sygehusmedicin R. Medicinsk behandling af unipolar depression hos voksne; 2016.
Wilson SJ, Nutt DJ, Alford C, et al. British Association for Psychopharmacology consensus statement on evidence-based treatment of insomnia, parasomnias and circadian rhythm disorders. J Psychopharmacol. 2010;24(11):1577-1601. doi:10.1177/0269881110379307
Rauwerda NL, Knoop H, Pot I, et al. TIMELAPSE study-efficacy of low-dose amitriptyline versus cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic insomnia in patients with medical comorbidity: study protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter non-inferiority trial. Trials. 2021;22(1):904. doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05868-4
Guaiana G, Gupta S, Chiodo D, Davies SJ, Haederle K, Koesters M. Agomelatine versus other antidepressive agents for major depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(12):CD008851. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008851.pub2
Solmi M, Cortese S, Vita G, et al. An umbrella review of candidate predictors of response, remission, recovery, and relapse across mental disorders. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28(9):3671-3687. doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02298-3
Gauthier G, Guérin A, Zhdanava M, et al. Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs following first-line antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: a retrospective US claims database analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):222. doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1385-0

Auteurs

Lars Vedel Kessing (LV)

Copenhagen Affective disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Simon Christoffer Ziersen (SC)

Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Frederik Mølkjaer Andersen (FM)

Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Thomas Gerds (T)

Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Esben Budtz-Jørgensen (E)

Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH