Harnessing eukaryotic retroelement proteins for transgene insertion into human safe-harbor loci.


Journal

Nature biotechnology
ISSN: 1546-1696
Titre abrégé: Nat Biotechnol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9604648

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 14 12 2022
accepted: 10 01 2024
medline: 21 2 2024
pubmed: 21 2 2024
entrez: 21 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Current approaches for inserting autonomous transgenes into the genome, such as CRISPR-Cas9 or virus-based strategies, have limitations including low efficiency and high risk of untargeted genome mutagenesis. Here, we describe precise RNA-mediated insertion of transgenes (PRINT), an approach for site-specifically primed reverse transcription that directs transgene synthesis directly into the genome at a multicopy safe-harbor locus. PRINT uses delivery of two in vitro transcribed RNAs: messenger RNA encoding avian R2 retroelement-protein and template RNA encoding a transgene of length validated up to 4 kb. The R2 protein coordinately recognizes the target site, nicks one strand at a precise location and primes complementary DNA synthesis for stable transgene insertion. With a cultured human primary cell line, over 50% of cells can gain several 2 kb transgenes, of which more than 50% are full-length. PRINT advantages include no extragenomic DNA, limiting risk of deleterious mutagenesis and innate immune responses, and the relatively low cost, rapid production and scalability of RNA-only delivery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38379101
doi: 10.1038/s41587-024-02137-y
pii: 10.1038/s41587-024-02137-y
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : DP1 HL156819
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Dobner, J., Ramachandran, H. & Rossi, A. Genome editing in translational medicine: an inventory. Front. Biosci. 27, 241 (2022).
doi: 10.31083/j.fbl2708241
Butt, M. H. et al. Appraisal for the potential of viral and nonviral vectors in gene therapy: a review. Genes 13, 1370 (2022).
pubmed: 36011281 pmcid: 9407213 doi: 10.3390/genes13081370
Malik, H. S., Burke, W. D. & Eickbush, T. H. The age and evolution of non-LTR retrotransposable elements. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 793–805 (1999).
pubmed: 10368957 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026164
Fujiwara, H. Site-specific non-LTR retrotransposons. Microbiol. Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0001-2014 (2015).
Burns, K. H. Our conflict with transposable elements and its implications for human disease. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 15, 51–70 (2020).
pubmed: 31977294 doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012419-032633
Ritchie, C., Carozza, J. A. & Li, L. Biochemistry, cell biology, and pathophysiology of the innate immune cGAS-cGAMP-STING pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 91, 599–628 (2022).
pubmed: 35287475 doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-040320-101629
Eickbush, T. H. & Eickbush, D. G. Integration, regulation, and long-term stability of R2 retrotransposons. Microbiol. Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0011-2014 (2015).
Wei, W. et al. Human L1 retrotransposition: cis preference versus trans complementation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 1429–1439 (2001).
pubmed: 11158327 pmcid: 99594 doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.4.1429-1439.2001
Kuroki-Kami, A. et al. Targeted gene knockin in zebrafish using the 28S rDNA-specific non-LTR-retrotransposon R2Ol. Mob. DNA 10, 23 (2019).
pubmed: 31139267 pmcid: 6530143 doi: 10.1186/s13100-019-0167-2
Su, Y., Nichuguti, N., Kuroki-Kami, A. & Fujiwara, H. Sequence-specific retrotransposition of 28S rDNA-specific LINE R2Ol in human cells. RNA 25, 1432–1438 (2019).
pubmed: 31434792 pmcid: 6795142 doi: 10.1261/rna.072512.119
Kulpa, D. A. & Moran, J. V. Cis-preferential LINE-1 reverse transcriptase activity in ribonucleoprotein particles. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 655–660 (2006).
pubmed: 16783376 doi: 10.1038/nsmb1107
Kojima, K. K., Seto, Y. & Fujiwara, H. The wide distribution and change of target specificity of R2 non-LTR retrotransposons in animals. PLoS ONE 11, e0163496 (2016).
pubmed: 27662593 pmcid: 5035012 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163496
Yang, J. & Eickbush, T. H. RNA-induced changes in the activity of the endonuclease encoded by the R2 retrotransposable element. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 3455–3465 (1998).
pubmed: 9584185 pmcid: 108926 doi: 10.1128/MCB.18.6.3455
Shivram, H., Cawley, D. & Christensen, S. M. Targeting novel sites: the N-terminal DNA binding domain of non-LTR retrotransposons is an adaptable module that is implicated in changing site specificities. Mob. Genet. Elements 1, 169–178 (2011).
pubmed: 22479684 pmcid: 3312299 doi: 10.4161/mge.1.3.18453
Thompson, B. K. & Christensen, S. M. Independently derived targeting of 28S rDNA by A- and D-clade R2 retrotransposons: plasticity of integration mechanism. Mob. Genet. Elements 1, 29–37 (2011).
pubmed: 22016843 pmcid: 3190273 doi: 10.4161/mge.1.1.16485
Wilkinson, M. E., Frangieh, C. J., Macrae, R. K. & Zhang, F. Structure of the R2 non-LTR retrotransposon initiating target-primed reverse transcription. Science 380, 301–308 (2023).
pubmed: 37023171 pmcid: 10499050 doi: 10.1126/science.adg7883
Deng, P. et al. Structural RNA components supervise the sequential DNA cleavage in R2 retrotransposon. Cell 186, 2865–2879.e20 (2023).
pubmed: 37301196 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.05.032
Hori, Y., Engel, C. & Kobayashi, T. Regulation of ribosomal RNA gene copy number, transcription and nucleolus organization in eukaryotes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 414–429 (2023).
pubmed: 36732602 doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00573-9
Jakubczak, J. L., Burke, W. D. & Eickbush, T. H. Retrotransposable elements R1 and R2 interrupt the rRNA genes of most insects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 3295–3299 (1991).
pubmed: 1849649 pmcid: 51433 doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3295
Perez-Gonzalez, C. E. & Eickbush, T. H. Dynamics of R1 and R2 elements in the rDNA locus of Drosophila simulans. Genetics 158, 1557–1567 (2001).
pubmed: 11514447 pmcid: 1461747 doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.4.1557
Stults, D. M., Killen, M. W., Pierce, H. H. & Pierce, A. J. Genomic architecture and inheritance of human ribosomal RNA gene clusters. Genome Res. 18, 13–18 (2008).
pubmed: 18025267 pmcid: 2134781 doi: 10.1101/gr.6858507
Killen, M. W., Stults, D. M., Adachi, N., Hanakahi, L. & Pierce, A. J. Loss of Bloom syndrome protein destabilizes human gene cluster architecture. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, 3417–3428 (2009).
pubmed: 19542097 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp282
Smirnov, E., Chmurciakova, N. & Cmarko, D. Human rDNA and cancer. Cells 10, 3452 (2021).
pubmed: 34943960 pmcid: 8700125 doi: 10.3390/cells10123452
Lisowski, L. et al. Ribosomal DNA integrating rAAV-rDNA vectors allow for stable transgene expression. Mol. Ther. 20, 1912–1923 (2012).
pubmed: 22990671 pmcid: 3464642 doi: 10.1038/mt.2012.164
Wang, Z. et al. AAV vectors containing rDNA homology display increased chromosomal integration and transgene persistence. Mol. Ther. 20, 1902–1911 (2012).
pubmed: 22990673 pmcid: 3464636 doi: 10.1038/mt.2012.157
Liu, X. et al. Targeting of the human coagulation factor IX gene at rDNA locus of human embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE 7, e37071 (2012).
pubmed: 22615895 pmcid: 3353886 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037071
Hu, Y. et al. Nonviral gene targeting at rDNA locus of human mesenchymal stem cells. BioMed. Res. Int. 2013, 135189 (2013).
pubmed: 23762822 pmcid: 3666425 doi: 10.1155/2013/135189
Pang, J. et al. Targeting of the human F8 at the multicopy rDNA locus in Hemophilia A patient-derived iPSCs using TALENickases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 472, 144–149 (2016).
pubmed: 26921444 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.02.083
Wang, Y. et al. Paired CRISPR/Cas9 nickases mediate efficient site-specific integration of F9 into rDNA locus of mouse ESCs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 3035 (2018).
pubmed: 30301136 pmcid: 6213315 doi: 10.3390/ijms19103035
Sun, Q. et al. Ectopic expression of factor VIII in MSCs and hepatocytes derived from rDNA targeted hESCs. Clin. Chim. Acta 495, 656–663 (2019).
pubmed: 30096315 doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.08.007
Schenkwein, D., Afzal, S., Nousiainen, A., Schmidt, M. & Yla-Herttuala, S. Efficient nuclease-directed integration of lentivirus vectors into the human ribosomal DNA locus. Mol. Ther. 28, 1858–1875 (2020).
pubmed: 32504545 pmcid: 7403359 doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.05.019
Zeng, B. et al. Targeted addition of mini-dystrophin into rDNA locus of Duchenne muscular dystrophy patient-derived iPSCs. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 545, 40–45 (2021).
pubmed: 33540285 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.01.056
Zhao, J. et al. Ectopic expression of FVIII in HPCs and MSCs derived from hiPSCs with site-specific integration of ITGA2B promoter-driven BDDF8 gene in hemophilia A. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 623 (2022).
pubmed: 35054807 pmcid: 8775870 doi: 10.3390/ijms23020623
Bibillo, A. & Eickbush, T. H. The reverse transcriptase of the R2 non-LTR retrotransposon: continuous synthesis of cDNA on non-continuous RNA templates. J. Mol. Biol. 316, 459–473 (2002).
pubmed: 11866511 doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5369
Luan, D. D. & Eickbush, T. H. Downstream 28S gene sequences on the RNA template affect the choice of primer and the accuracy of initiation by the R2 reverse transcriptase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4726–4734 (1996).
pubmed: 8756630 pmcid: 231473 doi: 10.1128/MCB.16.9.4726
Eickbush, D. G. & Eickbush, T. H. R2 retrotransposons encode a self-cleaving ribozyme for processing from an rRNA cotranscript. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 3142–3150 (2010).
pubmed: 20421411 pmcid: 2897577 doi: 10.1128/MCB.00300-10
Eickbush, D. G., Burke, W. D. & Eickbush, T. H. Evolution of the R2 retrotransposon ribozyme and its self-cleavage site. PLoS ONE 8, e66441 (2013).
pubmed: 24066021 pmcid: 3774820 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066441
Levesque, D., Choufani, S. & Perreault, J. P. Delta ribozyme benefits from a good stability in vitro that becomes outstanding in vivo. RNA 8, 464–477 (2002).
pubmed: 11991641 pmcid: 1370269 doi: 10.1017/S1355838202020289
Jiang, X. R. et al. Telomerase expression in human somatic cells does not induce changes associated with a transformed phenotype. Nat. Genet. 21, 111–114 (1999).
pubmed: 9916802 doi: 10.1038/5056
Meers, C., Keskin, H. & Storici, F. DNA repair by RNA: templated, or not templated, that is the question. DNA Repair 44, 17–21 (2016).
pubmed: 27237587 pmcid: 4958532 doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.05.002
Meers, C. et al. Genetic characterization of three distinct mechanisms supporting RNA-driven DNA repair and modification reveals major role of DNA polymerase zeta. Mol. Cell 79, 1037–1050.e5 (2020).
pubmed: 32882183 pmcid: 7502545 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.08.011
To, K. K. W. & Cho, W. C. S. An overview of rational design of mRNA-based therapeutics and vaccines. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 16, 1307–1317 (2021).
pubmed: 34058918 doi: 10.1080/17460441.2021.1935859
Stults, D. M. et al. Human rRNA gene clusters are recombinational hotspots in cancer. Cancer Res. 69, 9096–9104 (2009).
pubmed: 19920195 doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2680
Shay, J. W. & Wright, W. E. Use of telomerase to create bioengineered tissues. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1057, 479–491 (2005).
pubmed: 16399914 doi: 10.1196/annals.1356.037
Govindaraju, A., Cortez, J. D., Reveal, B. & Christensen, S. M. Endonuclease domain of non-LTR retrotransposons: loss-of-function mutants and modeling of the R2Bm endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 3276–3287 (2016).
pubmed: 26961309 pmcid: 4838377 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw134
Luchetti, A. & Mantovani, B. Non-LTR R2 element evolutionary patterns: phylogenetic incongruences, rapid radiation and the maintenance of multiple lineages. PLoS ONE 8, e57076 (2013).
pubmed: 23451148 pmcid: 3581529 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057076
Ostertag, E. M. & Kazazian, H. H. Jr. Twin priming: a proposed mechanism for the creation of inversions in L1 retrotransposition. Genome Res. 11, 2059–2065 (2001).
pubmed: 11731496 pmcid: 311219 doi: 10.1101/gr.205701
Kent, T., Mateos-Gomez, P. A., Sfeir, A. & Pomerantz, R. T. Polymerase theta is a robust terminal transferase that oscillates between three different mechanisms during end-joining. eLife 5, e13740 (2016).
pubmed: 27311885 pmcid: 4912351 doi: 10.7554/eLife.13740
Moldovan, J. B., Wang, Y., Shuman, S., Mills, R. E. & Moran, J. V. RNA ligation precedes the retrotransposition of U6/LINE-1 chimeric RNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 20612–20622 (2019).
pubmed: 31548405 pmcid: 6789731 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805404116
Potapov, V. et al. Base modifications affecting RNA polymerase and reverse transcriptase fidelity. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 5753–5763 (2018).
pubmed: 29750267 pmcid: 6009661 doi: 10.1093/nar/gky341
Martin-Alonso, S., Frutos-Beltran, E. & Menendez-Arias, L. Reverse transcriptase: from transcriptomics to genome editing. Trends Biotechnol. 39, 194–210 (2021).
pubmed: 32653101 doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.06.008
Wells, J. N. & Feschotte, C. A field guide to eukaryotic transposable elements. Annu. Rev. Genet. 54, 539–561 (2020).
pubmed: 32955944 pmcid: 8293684 doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-040620-022145
Manoj, F., Tai, L. W., Wang, K. S. M. & Kuhlman, T. E. Targeted insertion of large genetic payloads using cas directed LINE-1 reverse transcriptase. Sci. Rep. 11, 23625 (2021).
pubmed: 34880381 pmcid: 8654924 doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03130-0
Chen, P. J. & Liu, D. R. Prime editing for precise and highly versatile genome manipulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 161–177 (2023).
pubmed: 36344749 doi: 10.1038/s41576-022-00541-1
Carroll, D. Genome editing: past, present, and future. Yale J. Biol. Med. 19, 653–659 (2017).
Yamamoto, Y. & Gerbi, S. A. Making ends meet: targeted integration of DNA fragments by genome editing. Chromosoma 127, 405–420 (2018).
pubmed: 30003320 pmcid: 6330168 doi: 10.1007/s00412-018-0677-6
Sandoval-Villegas, N., Nurieva, W., Amberger, M. & Ivics, Z. Contemporary transposon tools: a review and guide through mechanisms and applications of Sleeping Beauty, piggyBac and Tol2 for genome engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 5084 (2021).
pubmed: 34064900 pmcid: 8151067 doi: 10.3390/ijms22105084
Hosur, V., Low, B. E. & Wiles, M. V. Programmable RNA-guided large DNA transgenesis by CRISPR/Cas9 and site-specific integrase Bxb1. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 910151 (2022).
pubmed: 35866031 pmcid: 9294445 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.910151
Lampe, G. D. et al. Targeted DNA integration in human cells without double-strand breaks using CRISPR-associated transposases. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 87–98 (2024).
pubmed: 36991112 doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01748-1
Sabatino, D. E. et al. Evaluating the state of the science for adeno-associated virus integration: an integrated perspective. Mol. Ther. 30, 2646–2663 (2022).
pubmed: 35690906 pmcid: 9372310 doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.06.004
Koonin, E. V., Gootenberg, J. S. & Abudayyeh, O. O. Discovery of diverse CRISPR-Cas systems and expansion of the genome engineering toolbox. Biochemistry 62, 3465–3487 (2023).
pubmed: 37192099 doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.3c00159
Lopez, S. C., Crawford, K. D., Lear, S. K., Bhattarai-Kline, S. & Shipman, S. L. Precise genome editing across kingdoms of life using retron-derived DNA. Nat. Chem. Biol. 18, 199–206 (2022).
pubmed: 34949838 doi: 10.1038/s41589-021-00927-y
Zhao, B., Chen, S. A., Lee, J. & Fraser, H. B. Bacterial retrons enable precise gene editing in human cells. CRISPR J. 5, 31–39 (2022).
pubmed: 35076284 pmcid: 8892976 doi: 10.1089/crispr.2021.0065
Martini, P. G. V. & Guey, L. T. A new era for rare genetic diseases: messenger RNA therapy. Hum. Gene Ther. 30, 1180–1189 (2019).
pubmed: 31179759 doi: 10.1089/hum.2019.090
Kariko, K. In vitro-transcribed mRNA therapeutics: out of the shadows and into the spotlight. Mol. Ther. 27, 691–692 (2019).
pubmed: 30905578 pmcid: 6453554 doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.03.009
Sadelain, M., Papapetrou, E. P. & Bushman, F. D. Safe harbours for the integration of new DNA in the human genome. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 51–58 (2011).
pubmed: 22129804 doi: 10.1038/nrc3179
Papapetrou, E. P. & Schambach, A. Gene insertion into genomic safe harbors for human gene therapy. Mol. Ther. 24, 678–684 (2016).
pubmed: 26867951 pmcid: 4886940 doi: 10.1038/mt.2016.38
van Sluis, M. & McStay, B. Nucleolar DNA double-strand break responses underpinning rDNA genomic stability. Trends Genet. 35, 743–753 (2019).
pubmed: 31353047 doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2019.07.001
Korsholm, L. M. et al. Recent advances in the nucleolar responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 9449–9461 (2020).
pubmed: 32857853 pmcid: 7515731 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa713
Levitt, N., Briggs, D., Gil, A. & Proudfoot, N. J. Definition of an efficient synthetic poly(A) site. Genes Dev. 3, 1019–1025 (1989).
pubmed: 2570734 doi: 10.1101/gad.3.7.1019
Moritz, B., Becker, P. B. & Gopfert, U. CMV promoter mutants with a reduced propensity to productivity loss in CHO cells. Sci. Rep. 5, 16952 (2015).
pubmed: 26581326 pmcid: 4652263 doi: 10.1038/srep16952
Gendra, E., Colgan, D. F., Meany, B. & Konarska, M. M. A sequence motif in the simian virus 40 (SV40) early core promoter affects alternative splicing of transcribed mRNA. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 11648–11657 (2007).
pubmed: 17331949 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611126200
Upton, H. E. et al. Low-bias ncRNA libraries using ordered two-template relay: Serial template jumping by a modified retroelement reverse transcriptase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2107900118 (2021).
pubmed: 34649994 pmcid: 8594491 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2107900118
Henderson, J. M. et al. Cap 1 messenger RNA synthesis with co-transcriptional CleanCap((R)) analog by in vitro transcription. Curr. Protoc. 1, e39 (2021).
pubmed: 33524237 doi: 10.1002/cpz1.39
Messenger RNA encoding the full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. World Health Organization https://web.archive.org/web/20210105162941/https://mednet-communities.net/inn/db/media/docs/11889.doc (2020).
Vogan, J. M. & Collins, K. Dynamics of human telomerase holoenzyme assembly and subunit exchange across the cell cycle. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 21320–21335 (2015).
pubmed: 26170453 pmcid: 4571862 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.659359
Sexton, A. N. et al. Genetic and molecular identification of three human TPP1 functions in telomerase action: recruitment, activation, and homeostasis set point regulation. Genes Dev. 28, 1885–1899 (2014).
pubmed: 25128433 pmcid: 4197946 doi: 10.1101/gad.246819.114
Hindson, B. J. et al. High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number. Anal. Chem. 83, 8604–8610 (2011).
pubmed: 22035192 pmcid: 3216358 doi: 10.1021/ac202028g
Watada, E. et al. Age-dependent ribosomal DNA variations in mice. Mol. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00368-20 (2020).
Oscorbin, I., Kechin, A., Boyarskikh, U. & Filipenko, M. Multiplex ddPCR assay for screening copy number variations in BRCA1 gene. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 178, 545–555 (2019).
pubmed: 31482362 doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05425-3
Ma, J. et al. Reference gene selection for clinical chimeric antigen receptor T-cell product vector copy number assays. Cytotherapy 25, 598–604 (2023).
pubmed: 36935289 pmcid: 10159958 doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2023.02.010
Shoda, K. et al. Monitoring the HER2 copy number status in circulating tumor DNA by droplet digital PCR in patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 20, 126–135 (2017).
pubmed: 26874951 doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0599-z
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
pubmed: 24695404 pmcid: 4103590 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997 (2013).
Nurk, S. et al. The complete sequence of a human genome. Science 376, 44–53 (2022).
pubmed: 35357919 pmcid: 9186530 doi: 10.1126/science.abj6987
Madeira, F. et al. Search and sequence analysis tools services from EMBL-EBI in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, W276–W279 (2022).
pubmed: 35412617 pmcid: 9252731 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac240
Shrikumar, A., Greenside, P. & Kundaje, A. Learning important features through propagating activation difference. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02685 (2019).
Hirt, B. Selective extraction of polyoma DNA from infected mouse cell cultures. J. Mol. Biol. 26, 365–369 (1967).
pubmed: 4291934 doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90307-5
Mul, Y. M. & Rio, D. C. Reprogramming the purine nucleotide cofactor requirement of Drosophila P element transposase in vivo. EMBO J. 16, 4441–4447 (1997).
pubmed: 9250688 pmcid: 1170070 doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.14.4441
Cock, P. J. et al. Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 25, 1422–1423 (2009).
pubmed: 19304878 pmcid: 2682512 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).
pubmed: 29750242 pmcid: 6137996 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191
Li, H. New strategies to improve minimap2 alignment accuracy. Bioinformatics 37, 4572–4574 (2021).
pubmed: 34623391 pmcid: 8652018 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab705
Zhang, X. et al. Harnessing eukaryotic retroelement proteins for transgene insertion into human safe-harbor loci. NCBI Bioproject https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA910950 (2023).
Zhang, X. et al. R2 transgene analysis v1. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10439696 (2023).

Auteurs

Xiaozhu Zhang (X)

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Briana Van Treeck (B)

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Connor A Horton (CA)

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Jeremy J R McIntyre (JJR)

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Sarah M Palm (SM)

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Justin L Shumate (JL)

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Kathleen Collins (K)

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. kcollins@berkeley.edu.

Classifications MeSH