In vitro comparison of two food choice methodologies for necrophagous species of the genus Thanatophilus (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Silphinae).

Silphinae behavior food choice forensic entomology necrophagy

Journal

Journal of medical entomology
ISSN: 1938-2928
Titre abrégé: J Med Entomol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0375400

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 05 09 2023
revised: 11 01 2024
accepted: 29 01 2024
medline: 21 2 2024
pubmed: 21 2 2024
entrez: 21 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To accurately model the food webs, we need to acquire precise data on food ecology of the interacting species. This allows better understanding of the trophic interactions and for the necrophagous species this information could be used in medico-legal investigations. For this reason, we recently proposed standardized laboratory methodology to assess the foraging strategies based on parallel testing of 2 food items (meat, dead larvae) (Jakubec et al. 2021). The original methodology had 2 shortcomings. It was not suited for testing living larvae, which could prove predatory behavior of the species. The methodology was also based on parallel experimental design, where the food items are tested together, which could underestimate the maximum consumption of the tested subject for some items. To test if these concerns are valid, we improved original methodology allowing testing living larvae as well as a new sequential experimental setup, where consumption of each item is tested individually in a random order, thus theoretically giving an unbiased maximum consumption estimate. These methodologies were tested head-to-head on 3 forensically relevant species from the genus Thanatophilus (Thanatophilus micans (Fabricius 1794)(Fabricius 1794), Thanatophilus rugosus (Linnaeus, 1758), and Thanatophilus sinuatus(Fabricius, 1775)). The experiments have confirmed that all 3 species are almost strictly necrophagous, although they were capable of predation, despite the presence of preferred food (meat). The comparison also showed that the sequential design has indeed improved capability to quantify the maximal consumption of the given food item. Thus, we suggest following this methodology in future studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38382055
pii: 7612210
doi: 10.1093/jme/tjae018
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Charles University

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Jakub Kadlec (J)

Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 1594/7, Prague 128 43, Czech Republic.

Pavel Jakubec (P)

Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic.

Petr Šípek (P)

Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 1594/7, Prague 128 43, Czech Republic.

Classifications MeSH