Tinkering with care: Implementing extended-release buprenorphine depot treatment for opioid dependence.

Care Extended-release buprenorphine depot Implementation practices Innovation Opioid pharmacotherapy Tinkering

Journal

The International journal on drug policy
ISSN: 1873-4758
Titre abrégé: Int J Drug Policy
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9014759

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 16 08 2023
revised: 08 02 2024
accepted: 12 02 2024
medline: 22 2 2024
pubmed: 22 2 2024
entrez: 21 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

We examine how extended-release buprenorphine depot (BUP-XR) is put to use and made to work in implementation practices, attending to how care practices are challenged and adapted as a long-acting technology is introduced into service in opioid agonist treatment (OAT) in Australia. Our approach is informed by ideas in science and technology studies (STS) emphasising the irreducible entanglement of care practices and technology, and in particular the concept of 'tinkering' as a practice of adaptation. To make our analysis, we draw on qualitative interview accounts (n = 19) of service providers involved in BUP-XR implementation across five sites. Our analysis considers the disruptive novelty of BUP-XR. Tinkering to make a novel technology work in practice slows down the expectation of implementation in relation to transformative innovation, despite the promise of dramatic or rapid change. Tinkering allowed for more open relations, for new care practices that departed from the routine and familiar, opening potential for how BUP-XR could be put to use and made to work in its new situation, and as its situation evolved along-with its implementation. Flexibility and openness of altering relations was, however, at times, held in tension with inflexibility and closure. This analysis identifies a concern for what is made present and what is made absent in the altered care network affected by BUP-XR, with the multiple effects of supervised daily dosing practices thrown into relief as they become absented. Tinkering to implement BUP-XR locally connects with a broader assemblage of trial and movement in the constitution of treatment. The introduction of long-acting technologies prompts new questions about embedded implementation practices, including supervised dosing, urinalysis, the time and place of psychosocial support, and how other social aspects of care might be recalibrated in drug treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38382354
pii: S0955-3959(24)00044-6
doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104359
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104359

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests This study was supported by an Externally Sponsored Collaborative Research grant from Indivior PLC. Indivior contributed to the study design and analysis plan of the clinical parent study (Farrell et al., 2022) but not this qualitative study; Indivior had no role in collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. LD and MF disclose untied educational grants from Seqirus and Indivior for the study of opioid medications.

Auteurs

K Lancaster (K)

Centre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Goldsmiths, University of London, UK. Electronic address: k.lancaster@unsw.edu.au.

S Gendera (S)

Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

C Treloar (C)

Centre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

T Rhodes (T)

Centre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.

J Shahbazi (J)

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

M Byrne (M)

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

S Nielsen (S)

Monash Addiction Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

L Degenhardt (L)

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

M Farrell (M)

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Classifications MeSH