UFM1 E3 ligase promotes recycling of 60S ribosomal subunits from the ER.


Journal

Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 13 03 2023
accepted: 15 01 2024
medline: 22 2 2024
pubmed: 22 2 2024
entrez: 21 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Reversible modification of target proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins (UBLs) is widely used by eukaryotic cells to control protein fate and cell behaviour

Identifiants

pubmed: 38383785
doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07073-0
pii: 10.1038/s41586-024-07073-0
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Références

Cappadocia, L. & Lima, C. D. Ubiquitin-like protein conjugation: structures, chemistry, and mechanism. Chem. Rev. 118, 889–918 (2018).
pubmed: 28234446 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00737
Walczak, C. P. et al. Ribosomal protein RPL26 is the principal target of UFMylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1299–1308 (2019).
pubmed: 30626644 pmcid: 6347690 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816202116
Wang, L. et al. UFMylation of RPL26 links translocation-associated quality control to endoplasmic reticulum protein homeostasis. Cell Res. 30, 5–20 (2020).
pubmed: 31595041 doi: 10.1038/s41422-019-0236-6
Scavone, F., Gumbin, S. C., DaRosa, P. A. & Kopito, R. R. RPL26/uL24 UFMylation is essential for ribosome-associated quality control at the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2220340120 (2023).
pubmed: 37036982 pmcid: 10120006 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220340120
Millrine, D., Peter, J. J. & Kulathu, Y. A guide to UFMylation, an emerging posttranslational modification. FEBS J. 290, 5040–5056 (2023).
pubmed: 36680403 doi: 10.1111/febs.16730
Peter, J. J. et al. A non-canonical scaffold-type E3 ligase complex mediates protein UFMylation. EMBO J. 41, e111015 (2022).
pubmed: 36121123 pmcid: 9627666 doi: 10.15252/embj.2022111015
Ishimura, R. et al. Mechanistic insights into the roles of the UFM1 E3 ligase complex in ufmylation and ribosome-associated protein quality control. Sci. Adv. 9, eadh3635 (2023).
pubmed: 37595036 pmcid: 10438457 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adh3635
Gerakis, Y., Quintero, M., Li, H. & Hetz, C. The UFMylation system in proteostasis and beyond. Trends Cell Biol. 29, 974–986 (2019).
pubmed: 31703843 pmcid: 6917045 doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2019.09.005
Xie, Z., Fang, Z. & Pan, Z. Ufl1/RCAD, a Ufm1 E3 ligase, has an intricate connection with ER stress. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 135, 760–767 (2019).
pubmed: 31129212 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.170
Branon, T. C. et al. Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms with TurboID. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 880–887 (2018).
pubmed: 30125270 pmcid: 6126969 doi: 10.1038/nbt.4201
Kang, S. H. et al. Two novel ubiquitin-fold modifier 1 (Ufm1)-specific proteases, UfSP1 and UfSP2. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 5256–5262 (2007).
pubmed: 17182609 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610590200
Millrine, D. et al. Human UFSP1 is an active protease that regulates UFM1 maturation and UFMylation. Cell Rep. 40, 111168 (2022).
pubmed: 35926457 pmcid: 9638016 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111168
Russell, D. W. & Spremulli, L. L. Mechanism of action of the wheat germ ribosome dissociation factor: interaction with the 60S subunit. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 201, 518–526 (1980).
pubmed: 6901609 doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(80)90540-8
Gartmann, M. et al. Mechanism of eIF6-mediated inhibition of ribosomal subunit joining. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 14848–14851 (2010).
pubmed: 20356839 pmcid: 2865328 doi: 10.1074/jbc.C109.096057
Lyumkis, D. et al. Structural basis for translational surveillance by the large ribosomal subunit-associated protein quality control complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15981–15986 (2014).
pubmed: 25349383 pmcid: 4234556 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413882111
Shao, S., Brown, A., Santhanam, B. & Hegde, R. S. Structure and assembly pathway of the ribosome quality control complex. Mol. Cell 57, 433–444 (2015).
pubmed: 25578875 pmcid: 4321881 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.015
Shen, P. S. et al. Protein synthesis. Rqc2p and 60S ribosomal subunits mediate mRNA-independent elongation of nascent chains. Science 347, 75–78 (2015).
pubmed: 25554787 pmcid: 4451101 doi: 10.1126/science.1259724
Jumper, J. & Hassabis, D. Protein structure predictions to atomic accuracy with AlphaFold. Nat. Methods 19, 11–12 (2022).
pubmed: 35017726 doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01362-6
Evans, R. et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 (2022).
Halic, M. et al. Signal recognition particle receptor exposes the ribosomal translocon binding site. Science 312, 745–747 (2006).
pubmed: 16675701 doi: 10.1126/science.1124864
Beckmann, R. et al. Alignment of conduits for the nascent polypeptide chain in the ribosome–Sec61 complex. Science 278, 2123–2126 (1997).
pubmed: 9405348 doi: 10.1126/science.278.5346.2123
Habisov, S. et al. Structural and functional analysis of a novel interaction motif within UFM1-activating enzyme 5 (UBA5) required for binding to ubiquitin-like proteins and ufmylation. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 9025–9041 (2016).
pubmed: 26929408 pmcid: 4861472 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.715474
Padala, P. et al. Novel insights into the interaction of UBA5 with UFM1 via a UFM1-interacting sequence. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00610-0 (2017).
Martinez-Sanchez, A. et al. Template-free detection and classification of membrane-bound complexes in cryo-electron tomograms. Nat. Methods 17, 209–216 (2020).
pubmed: 31907446 doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0675-5
Braunger, K. et al. Structural basis for coupling protein transport and N-glycosylation at the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum. Science 360, 215–219 (2018).
pubmed: 29519914 pmcid: 6319373 doi: 10.1126/science.aar7899
McGilvray, P. T. et al. An ER translocon for multi-pass membrane protein biogenesis. eLife 9, e56889 (2020).
pubmed: 32820719 pmcid: 7505659 doi: 10.7554/eLife.56889
Smalinskaitė, L., Kim, M. K., Lewis, A. J. O., Keenan, R. J. & Hegde, R. S. Mechanism of an intramembrane chaperone for multipass membrane proteins. Nature 611, 161–166 (2022).
pubmed: 36261528 pmcid: 7614104 doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05336-2
Sundaram, A. et al. Substrate-driven assembly of a translocon for multipass membrane proteins. Nature 611, 167–172 (2022).
pubmed: 36261522 pmcid: 9630114 doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05330-8
Blobel, G. Extraction from free ribosomes of a factor mediating ribosome detachment from rough microsomes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 68, 1–7 (1976).
pubmed: 1247447 doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(76)90001-2
Borgese, D., Blobel, G. & Sabatini, D. D. In vitro exchange of ribosomal subunits between free and membrane-bound ribosomes. J. Mol. Biol. 74, 415–438 (1973).
pubmed: 4729519 doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90037-5
Grau-Bové, X., Sebé-Pedrós, A. & Ruiz-Trillo, I. The eukaryotic ancestor had a complex ubiquitin signaling system of archaeal origin. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 726–739 (2015).
pubmed: 25525215 doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu334
Picchianti, L. et al. Shuffled ATG8 interacting motifs form an ancestral bridge between UFMylation and autophagy. EMBO J. 42, e112053 (2023).
pubmed: 36762703 pmcid: 10183829 doi: 10.15252/embj.2022112053
Jan, C. H., Williams, C. C. & Weissman, J. S. Principles of ER cotranslational translocation revealed by proximity-specific ribosome profiling. Science 346, 1257521 (2014).
pubmed: 25378630 pmcid: 4285348 doi: 10.1126/science.1257521
Jaako, P. et al. eIF6 rebinding dynamically couples ribosome maturation and translation. Nat. Commun. 13, 1562 (2022).
pubmed: 35322020 pmcid: 8943182 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29214-7
Weis, F. et al. Mechanism of eIF6 release from the nascent 60S ribosomal subunit. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 914–919 (2015).
pubmed: 26479198 pmcid: 4871238 doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3112
Leto, D. E. et al. Genome-wide CRISPR analysis identifies substrate-specific conjugation modules in ER-associated degradation. Mol. Cell 73, 377–389.e11 (2019).
pubmed: 30581143 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.11.015
An, H., Ordureau, A., Körner, M., Paulo, J. A. & Harper, J. W. Systematic quantitative analysis of ribosome inventory during nutrient stress. Nature 583, 303–309 (2020).
pubmed: 32612236 pmcid: 7351614 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2446-y
McAlister, G. C. et al. Increasing the multiplexing capacity of TMTs using reporter ion isotopologues with isobaric masses. Anal. Chem. 84, 7469–7478 (2012).
pubmed: 22880955 pmcid: 3715028 doi: 10.1021/ac301572t
Paulo, J. A., O’Connell, J. D. & Gygi, S. P. A triple knockout (TKO) proteomics standard for diagnosing ion interference in isobaric labeling experiments. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom. 27, 1620–1625 (2016).
pubmed: 27400695 pmcid: 5018445 doi: 10.1007/s13361-016-1434-9
Schweppe, D. K. et al. Characterization and optimization of multiplexed quantitative analyses using high-field asymmetric-waveform ion mobility mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 91, 4010–4016 (2019).
pubmed: 30672687 pmcid: 6993951 doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05399
Erickson, B. K. et al. Active instrument engagement combined with a real-time database search for improved performance of sample multiplexing workflows. J. Proteome Res. 18, 1299–1306 (2019).
pubmed: 30658528 pmcid: 7081948 doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00899
Schweppe, D. K. et al. Full-featured, real-time database searching platform enables fast and accurate multiplexed quantitative proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 19, 2026–2034 (2020).
pubmed: 32126768 pmcid: 7295121 doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00860
Elias, J. E. & Gygi, S. P. Target–decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4, 207–214 (2007).
pubmed: 17327847 doi: 10.1038/nmeth1019
Elias, J. E. & Gygi, S. P. Target–decoy search strategy for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Methods Mol. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-444-9_5 (2010).
Huttlin, E. L. et al. A tissue-specific atlas of mouse protein phosphorylation and expression. Cell 143, 1174–1189 (2010).
pubmed: 21183079 pmcid: 3035969 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.001
Tyanova, S. et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods 13, 731–740 (2016).
pubmed: 27348712 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3901
Itzhak, D. N., Tyanova, S., Cox, J. & Borner, G. H. Global, quantitative and dynamic mapping of protein subcellular localization. eLife 5, e16950 (2016).
pubmed: 27278775 pmcid: 4959882 doi: 10.7554/eLife.16950
Ishihama, Y., Rappsilber, J. & Mann, M. Modular stop and go extraction tips with stacked disks for parallel and multidimensional peptide fractionation in proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 5, 988–994 (2006).
pubmed: 16602707 doi: 10.1021/pr050385q
Ha, B. H. et al. Structural basis for Ufm1 processing by UfSP1. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 14893–14900 (2008).
pubmed: 18321862 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708756200
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
pubmed: 28250466 pmcid: 5494038 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4193
Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).
pubmed: 26278980 pmcid: 6760662 doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008
Zhang, K. Gctf: real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016).
pubmed: 26592709 pmcid: 4711343 doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.11.003
Wagner, T. et al. SPHIRE-crYOLO is a fast and accurate fully automated particle picker for cryo-EM. Commun Biol. 2, 218 (2019).
pubmed: 31240256 pmcid: 6584505 doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0437-z
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
pubmed: 28165473 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4169
Wells, J. N. et al. Structure and function of yeast Lso2 and human CCDC124 bound to hibernating ribosomes. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000780 (2020).
pubmed: 32687489 pmcid: 7392345 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000780
Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).
pubmed: 30412051 pmcid: 6250425 doi: 10.7554/eLife.42166
Kimanius, D., Dong, L., Sharov, G., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. New tools for automated cryo-EM single-particle analysis in RELION-4.0. Biochem. J. 478, 4169–4185 (2021).
pubmed: 34783343 doi: 10.1042/BCJ20210708
Liang, X. et al. Structural snapshots of human pre-60S ribosomal particles before and after nuclear export. Nat. Commun. 11, 3542 (2020).
pubmed: 32669547 pmcid: 7363849 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17237-x
Sanchez-Garcia, R. et al. DeepEMhancer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing. Commun. Biol. 4, 874 (2021).
pubmed: 34267316 pmcid: 8282847 doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02399-1
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
pubmed: 32881101 doi: 10.1002/pro.3943
Holm, M. et al. mRNA decoding in human is kinetically and structurally distinct from bacteria. Nature 617, 200–207 (2023).
pubmed: 37020024 pmcid: 10156603 doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05908-w
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
pubmed: 15572765 doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158
Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 75, 861–877 (2019).
pubmed: 31588918 pmcid: 6778852 doi: 10.1107/S2059798319011471
Yamashita, K., Palmer, C. M., Burnley, T. & Murshudov, G. N. Cryo-EM single-particle structure refinement and map calculation using Servalcat. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 77, 1282–1291 (2021).
pubmed: 34605431 pmcid: 8489229 doi: 10.1107/S2059798321009475
Croll, T. I. ISOLDE: a physically realistic environment for model building into low-resolution electron-density maps. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 74, 519–530 (2018).
pubmed: 29872003 pmcid: 6096486 doi: 10.1107/S2059798318002425
Williams, C. J. et al. MolProbity: more and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 27, 293–315 (2018).
pubmed: 29067766 doi: 10.1002/pro.3330
Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).
pubmed: 28710774 doi: 10.1002/pro.3235
Amici, D. R. et al. FIREWORKS: a bottom-up approach to integrative coessentiality network analysis. Life Sci. Alliance 4, e202000882 (2021).
pubmed: 33328249 doi: 10.26508/lsa.202000882

Auteurs

Paul A DaRosa (PA)

Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Ivan Penchev (I)

Department of Biochemistry, Gene Center, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Samantha C Gumbin (SC)

Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Francesco Scavone (F)

Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Magda Wąchalska (M)

Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Joao A Paulo (JA)

Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Alban Ordureau (A)

Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Cell Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Joshua J Peter (JJ)

Medical Research Council Protein Phosphorylation and Ubiquitylation Unit (MRC-PPU), School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Yogesh Kulathu (Y)

Medical Research Council Protein Phosphorylation and Ubiquitylation Unit (MRC-PPU), School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

J Wade Harper (JW)

Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Thomas Becker (T)

Department of Biochemistry, Gene Center, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Roland Beckmann (R)

Department of Biochemistry, Gene Center, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. beckmann@genzentrum.lmu.de.

Ron R Kopito (RR)

Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. kopito@stanford.edu.

Classifications MeSH