The effect of positive thyroglobulin antibodies on the prognosis and treatment response in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Almost 15-30% of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) experience some degree of recurrence after treatment. Long-term follow-up and examination after thyroidectomy are very important in dealing with this issue. Serum thyroglobulin (Tg) level and neck ultrasound are the main part of follow-up for this purpose. The presence of thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAbs) leads to unreliable thyroglobulin (Tg) levels. The present study aims to evaluate the relationship between the simultaneous measurement of Tg and TgAb with long-term survival and response to treatment in these patients. This study was conducted by surveying available data from the medical records of 204 out of 600 patients over a 20-year period. In this research, 104 patients with positive TgAb were considered as the case group, and 100 patients with negative TgAb were selected as the control group. The relationship of TgAb titer was investigated with the staging, response to treatment (including the surgery number, number of radiotherapies, and dose of radioactive iodine), and recurrence in these patients. Also, the trend of TgAb changes was examined in the presence of high or low thyroglobulin levels during the follow-up period. Patients with high TgAb levels had more lymph node involvement, higher cumulative dose, a higher number of times received iodine, more surgical number, higher recurrence rate, and less excellent response (ER) to treatment during follow-ups. This effect of TgAb worsened in the presence of high Tg titer and remained up to 36 months. Overall, the baseline level of TgAb and its changes can be a suitable factor for predicting subsequent response to treatment and recurrence in patients with PTC. Accordingly, in cases with high TgAb and Tg levels, close follow-up should be considered up to Tg and TgAb normalization.

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.